Transformation of Identity in Ukrainian Cultural Space: From the Soviet Model to Ethno-Symbolic Nation-Building
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2026.362271Keywords:
cultural space, identity, primordialism, constructivism, ethnosymbolism, UkraineAbstract
The purpose of the article is to examine the transformation of identity within the Ukrainian cultural space, from the concept of the “Soviet person” identity, which functioned as a superstructure over national identity during the Soviet period, to ethno-symbolism, which is currently emerging on the basis of a synthesis of primordialism and constructivism. The methodological framework of the study is grounded in a comprehensive interdisciplinary approach to the analysis of the evolution of Ukrainian identity in the cultural space. Cultural, theoretical-philosophical, and historical-comparative methods are used to analyse changes in Ukrainian identity from the Soviet supranational model to contemporary forms of national and civic self-identification. Methods of analysis and synthesis are used to generalise the main theoretical concepts of primordialism, constructivism, and ethno-symbolism, while the comparative method is applied to contrast modern and postmodern approaches to understanding identity. The study also takes into account such research approaches to the formation of identity in the Ukrainian cultural space as postcolonial studies, deconstructionism, multiculturalism, and methodologically undefined apologetic discourse, which allows the Ukrainian cultural space to be considered as a dynamic system in which historical heritage, national memory, and cultural practices are continuously reinterpreted. The scientific novelty of the article lies in identifying the features of Ukrainian identity transformation under contemporary war and globalisation challenges, and in substantiating ethno-symbolism as a methodological basis for shaping the modern Ukrainian cultural space, which combines ethno-cultural heritage with civic-political consciousness. Conclusions. Contemporary academic discourse demonstrates a gradual shift from an ethnocentric to a civic-political understanding of Ukrainian identity, which has been significantly intensified after the events of 2014 and the full-scale Russian invasion in 2022. In this regard, an inclusive model of the nation is emerging in Ukrainian scholarship, where civic position, cultural memory, and conscious choice play a decisive role. In the cultural context, identity is understood as a dynamic and multidimensional phenomenon, whose interpretation is based on the combination of relative stability, variability, and dependence on socio-cultural transformations. As a result, the synthesis of primordialism and constructivism serves as a methodological foundation for ethno-symbolism as a contemporary model of Ukrainian identity formation. At the same time, the full-scale war has become a catalyst for societal consolidation, strengthening civic identity, and rethinking cultural and linguistic markers of national unity.
References
Bevz, T. A. (2020). Ukrainian identity and national security in the challenges of today. Ukrainian Studies, 4 (77), 143–158 [in Ukrainian].
Bevz, T. A. (2020). The concept of Ukrainian identity in the context of socio-cultural transformations: threats to national security in the humanitarian sphere (historiography of the problem). Ukrainian Studies, 3(76), 178–200 [in Ukrainian].
Bevza, B., & Hinkul, A. (2024). Construction of national identity: basic concepts and Ukrainian context. Ukrainian Institute of the Future [in Ukrainian].
Bevza, B., & Hinkul, A. (2023). Designing and implementing identity policy in Ukraine in 2022–2030: analysis and predictive model [in Ukrainian].
Wilson, E. (2004). Ukrainians: an unexpected nation. K.I.S. [in Ukrainian].
Hnatiuk, O. (2005). Farewell to the Empire. Ukrainian discussions on identity. Publishing House “Criticism Magazine” [in Ukrainian].
Honcharova, V. I., & Leonova, V. I. (2024). Formation of national identity of education seekers. Innovative pedagogy, 75, 123–126 [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsak, Ya., & Komarov, O. (2021). The path of formation of Ukrainian identity. Platform of joint actions [in Ukrainian].
Hrytsenko, O. A. (2019). Models of cultural space and the problem of identity of its elements. Culturological thought, 15, 66–82 [in Ukrainian].
Hibernau, M. (2012). Identity of nations. Tempora [in Ukrainian].
Zernii, Yu. (2008). The relationship between historical memory and national identity. Political management, 5, 104–115 [in Ukrainian].
Kulyk, V. (2023). Who belongs to the Ukrainian nation?. https://www.istpravda.com.ua/columns/2023/09/29/163184/ [in Ukrainian].
Cultural markers of Ukrainian identity in conditions of forced emigration. (n.d.). https://dspace.znu.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/12345/19087/1/MR_Sushevskuy%20Anatoliy.pdf [in Ukrainian].
Nahorna, L. P. (2008). Regional identity: Ukrainian context. I.F. Kuras Institute of International Relations and International Studies of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
After the war, no one will ask about identity anymore: Mykola Riabchuk on the fact that there is no concept of “two Ukraines”. (n.d.). https://suspilne.media/culture/556851-pisla-vijni-nihto-bilse-ne-pitatime-pro-identicnist-mikola-rabcuk-pro-te-so-nemae-koncepcii-dvoh-ukrain/ [in Ukrainian].
Riabchuk, M. (2019). Overcoming ambivalence. The dichotomy of Ukrainian national identity – Historical causes and political consequences. I. F. Kuras Institute of International Relations of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Plokhiy, S. (2023). Searching for roots: Russian identity and its impact on state formation. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hBXTMsHAPw [in Ukrainian].
Stepyko, M. T. (2011). Ukrainian Identity: Phenomenon and Principles of Formation. NISD [in Ukrainian].
Contradictions of identities in Ukraine and ways of their regulation in the context of the policy of civic consolidation of the Ukrainian nation (2015). I. F. Kuras Institute of Cultural and Historical Research of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine [in Ukrainian].
Vozniak, T. (n.d.). Phenomenon of Galician Identity. http://www.ji.lviv.ua/n36-1texts/vozniak.htm [in Ukrainian].
Vozniak, T. (2021). Taras Vozniak, winner of the 2021 Stus Prize: “In order to go, we need to understand where we are”. https://pen.org.ua/taras-voznyak-laureat-premiyi-imeni-vasylya-stusa-2021-roku-dlya-togo-shhob-ity-potribno-zrozumity-de-my-perebuvayemo [in Ukrainian].
Ukrainian identity: heritage, challenges and modernity. (n.d.). https://chmnu.edu.ua/ukrayinska-identichnist-spadshhina-vikliki-ta-suchasnist/ [in Ukrainian].
Fukuyama, F. (2020). Identity. The Need for Dignity and the Politics of Offense. Nash format [in Ukrainian].
Yaroslav Hrytsak. (2025). Lecture “Ukrainian Identity”. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWDVM5rf_xE [in Ukrainian].
Hall, S. (ed.) (1995). Modernity – An Introduction to Modem Societies. Blackwell, Cambridge, Mass [in English].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).