Symbolism and Formal Characteristics of Ornament in the Artistic Culture of Ukrainian Modernism

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32461/2226-3209.2.2026.362286

Keywords:

Ukrainian Modernism, ornament, symbolism, form-making, visual art, stylisation, composition

Abstract

The purpose of the article is to provide a comprehensive analysis of the formal and symbolic features of ornament in the artistic culture of Ukrainian Modernism, to identify the patterns of its formation and functioning as a sign system, and to clarify the role of ornament as a carrier of cultural meanings within the structure of fine art of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The research methodology is based on a combination of contemporary art-historical approaches to the analysis of ornament as an artistic phenomenon. The study employs formal-stylistic, semiotic, and iconological approaches, which allow the ornament to be examined in the unity of its formal and symbolic characteristics. This ensures a comprehensive understanding of ornament as a form of visual thinking in Ukrainian Modernism. The novelty of the research lies in the comprehensive consideration of ornament in Ukrainian Modernism as a synthetic phenomenon in which form and symbolism exist in inseparable unity, as well as in identifying the specificity of its functioning as a means of representing national cultural distinctiveness. Conclusions. Ornament in the artistic culture of Ukrainian Modernism is a complex synthetic phenomenon in which formal and symbolic elements form an integrated system of visual thinking. It functions not as a secondary decorative element, but as a key structure-forming component of the artistic language of Modernism. Interpreted through formal-stylistic, semiotic, and iconological approaches, ornament can be understood as a multi-layered sign system capable of conveying both aesthetic and worldview meanings. Its stylistics developed through the interaction of three main sources – folk decorative art, the Byzantine and Old Rus’ tradition, and Western European Modernism-whose synthesis ensured both national specificity and stylistic coherence. The formal organisation of ornament is based on line, rhythm, compositional variability, and the interplay of symmetry and asymmetry, creating a dynamic visual structure. Its symbolic dimension is shaped by archetypal and natural motifs that, transformed into stylised images, function as carriers of cultural memory. Thus, ornament serves both as a means of representing cultural tradition and as a tool for shaping a new visual language, which integrates national and European artistic tendencies.

References

Antonovych, D. (1923). Ukrainian Art. Praga [in Ukrainian].

Kara-Vasylieva, T.V. (2021). Art Nouveau in Ukraine. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Lohvin, H. (1977). Ukrainian Art of the 10th–18th Centuries. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Naiden, O. (1998). Ornament of Ukrainian folk painting. Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].

Selivachov, M.R. (2013). Lexicon of Ukrainian Ornamentation: (Iconography, Nomenclature, Stylistics, Typology). Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Ukrainian ornament – what are the types, what do the symbols mean and how to read folk patterns. (n.d.). https://prostir.media/ukrayina/ukrayinskyj-ornament-yaki-buvayut-vydy-shho-oznachayut-symvoly-ta-yak-chytaty-narodni-vizerunky [in Ukrainian].

Fedoruk, O.K. (2006). The Intersection of the Sign. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbakivskyi, V. (1980). Ornamentation of the Ukrainian House. Rym [in English].

Shcherbakivskyi, V. (1995). Ukrainian Art: Selected Unpublished Works. Kyiv [in Ukrainian].

Shcherbakivskyi, D. (1921). Symbolism in Ukrainian Art. I. The Vine. Proceedings of the Art Section of the Ukrainian Scientific Society, I [in Ukrainian].

Panofsky, E. (1939). Studies in Iconology. New York [in English].

Riegl, A. (1893). Stilfragen: Grundlegungen zu einer Geschichte der Ornamentik. Berlin [in German].

Published

2026-05-26

Issue

Section

Visual Arts and Restoration