Research into resistance to the motion of railroad undercarriages related to directing the wheelsets by a rail track

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.109791

Keywords:

railway transport, train traction, resource saving, motion resistance, directing the undercarriages by a rail track

Abstract

Energy saving direction on railway transport is substantiated based on reducing the motion resistance related to directing the undercarriages by a rail track. This motion resistance is defined as the kinematic resistance to motion. We clarified the nature of motion resistance associated with directing the rolling stock by a rail track. This opens up certain prospects in terms of reducing the kinematic motion resistance through design parameters of the trucks and the track. The kinematic resistance to motion could become an additional criterion for the optimal choice of characteristics of mechanical part of the undercarriages. The same applies to the permissible deviations in parameters of the rolling stock and the track.

We model steady motion of a semi-wagon’s truck in a circular curve at constant velocity under the action of contact track forces, tractive force from the locomotive, and the unsuppressed centrifugal or centripetal forces of inertia. The kinematic motion resistance is determined as the longitudinal force applied to the truck’s pivot in order to balance all external forces.

The dependences were obtained of specific kinematic resistance to motion on the motion velocity, base of the truck, radius of the curve, clearances of the wheelset in a rail track, and elevation of the outer rail. In particular, we derived a value of the motion velocity at which the minimum of resistance is observed. As we established, this speed does not match the equilibrium velocity and is 15−20 % lower.

The study showed the possibility to predict resistance related to directing the undercarriages by a rail track. This opens up the prospect for choosing rational parameters of undercarriage gear of the rolling stock from the point of view of motion resistance

Author Biographies

Victor Tkachenko, State University of Infrastructure and Technology Kyrylivska str., 9/3, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04080

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Traction rolling stock of the railway

Svitlana Sapronova, State University of Infrastructure and Technology Kyrylivska str., 9/3, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04080

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of cars and carriage facilities

Ivan Kulbovskiy, State University of Infrastructure and Technology Kyrylivska str., 9/3, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04080

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Building structures and facilities

Oleksij Fomin, State University of Infrastructure and Technology Kyrylivska str., 9/3, Kyiv, Ukraine, 04080

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of cars and carriage facilities

References

  1. Lopushinskiy, V. I. (1880). Soprotivlenie parovoza i vagona dvizheniyu i deystviyu parovoy mashiny parovoza. Sankt-Peterburg, 46.
  2. Liu, R. (Rachel), Golovitcher, I. M. (2003). Energy-efficient operation of rail vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37 (10), 917–932. doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2003.07.001
  3. Mikhailov, E., Semenov, S., Panchenko, T. (2013). The possibility of reducing kinematic slip with two-point contacting with rail wheel railway vehicle. Teka Komisji Motoryzacji i Energetyki Rolnictwa, 13 (3), 139–145.
  4. Wike, P. S. (2014). Pat. No. 9446774 USA. Railway car truck with friction damping. B61F5/12. No. US9446774 B2; declareted: 2.09.2014; published: 20.09.2016, Bul. No. 47, 9.
  5. Simson, S. A., Pearce, M. E. (2006). Wheel wear losses from bogie rotation resistance, effects of cant and speed. Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/ASME Joint Rail Conference. doi: 10.1109/rrcon.2006.215300
  6. Pieringer, A., Baeza, L., Kropp, W. (2015). Modelling of Railway Curve Squeal Including Effects of Wheel Rotation. Noise and Vibration Mitigation for Rail Transportation Systems, 417–424. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-44832-8_50
  7. Dusza, M. (2015). The wheel-rail contact friction influence on high speed vehicle model stability. Transport Problems, 10 (3), 73–86. doi: 10.21307/tp-2015-036
  8. Zeng, J., Wei, L., Wu, P. (2016). Safety evaluation for railway vehicles using an improved indirect measurement method of wheel–rail forces. Journal of Modern Transportation, 24 (2), 114–123. doi: 10.1007/s40534-016-0107-5
  9. Tkachenko, V. P., Sapronova, S. Y., Maliuk, S. V., Kulbovskyi, I. I. (2016). Studying the structure of railway rolling stock resistance. Мetallurgical and Mining Industry, 11, 30–36.
  10. Tkachenko, V., Sapronova, S. (2007). Steerability of railway vehicles. Transport Problems, 2, 9–16.
  11. Heathcote, H. L. (1920). The Ball Bearing: In the Making, under Test and on Service. Proceedings of the Institution of Automobile Engineers, 15 (1), 569–702. doi: 10.1243/piae_proc_1920_015_032_02
  12. Fomin, O. V. (2015). Improvement of upper bundling of side wall of gondola cars of 12-9745 model. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 1, 45–48.
  13. Myamlin, S., L. Neduzha, A. Ten, A. Shvets (2013). Research of friction indices influence on the freight car dynamics. Teka. Commission of motorization and energetics in agriculture, 13 (4), 159–166.
  14. Kelrykh, М., Fomin, О. (2014). Perspective directions of planning carrying systems of gondolas. Metallurgical and Mining Industry, 6, 57–60.
  15. Wolf, G., Chislett, J., Dick, M. (2014). Assessing the Effects of Coupler Force and Train Speed on Freight Car Curving Resistance. Journal of Wheel/Rail Interaction. Available at: http://interfacejournal.com/archives/384
  16. Golubenko, A., Sapronova, S., Tkacenko, V. (2007). Kinematics of point-to-point contact of wheels with a rails. Transport Problems, 2 (3), 57–61.
  17. Shiler, A. (2015). Analysis and Simulation of New Wheel Pair Construction. Procedia Engineering, 100, 1714–1723. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.547
  18. Michálek, T., Zelenka, J. (2011). Reduction of lateral forces between the railway vehicle and the track in small-radius curves by means of active elements. Applied and Computational Mechanics, 5 (2), 187–196.
  19. Spiryagin, M., Yoo, H. H., Lee, K. S., Spiryagin, V., Gorbunov, M. (2013). Investigation of influence of constraints with radius links on locomotive axle load distribution and wheelset steering ability. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 27 (7), 1903–1913. doi: 10.1007/s12206-013-0506-z
  20. Handley, J. H. (1992). General Motors' Three-Axle Radial Steering Bogie for Heavy Haul Locomotives. Tenth International Wheelset Congress: Sharing the Latest Wheelset Technology in Order to Reduce Costs and Improve Railway Productivity; Preprints of Papers. Institution of Engineers, Australia, 97–100.
  21. Pombo, J., Ambrósio, J., Silva, M. (2007). A new wheel-rail contact model for railway dynamics. Vehicle System Dynamics, 45 (2), 165–189. doi: 10.1080/00423110600996017
  22. Liang, B., Iwnicki, S. D. (2007). An Experimental Study of Independently Rotating Wheels for Railway Vehicles. 2007 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. doi: 10.1109/icma.2007.4303908
  23. Zaazaa, K., Whitten, B. (2007). Effect of independently rotating wheels on the dynamic performance of railroad vehicles. Proceedings of the International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 467–477. doi: 10.1115/imece2007-43645
  24. Tkachenko, V. P., Sapronova, S. Yu., Kulbovskiy, I. I., Zub, E. P. (2016). Resistance to the movement and handling of rail crews. Kyiv: DETUT, 160.

Downloads

Published

2017-10-24

How to Cite

Tkachenko, V., Sapronova, S., Kulbovskiy, I., & Fomin, O. (2017). Research into resistance to the motion of railroad undercarriages related to directing the wheelsets by a rail track. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(7 (89), 65–72. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.109791

Issue

Section

Applied mechanics

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>