Substantiation of counter­vortex spillway structures of hydrotechnical facilities

Authors

  • Valeriy Volshanik Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Yaroslavskoye highway, 26, Moscow, Russia, 129337, Russian Federation
  • Genrikh Orekhov Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Yaroslavskoye highway, 26, Moscow, Russia, 129337, Russian Federation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123918

Keywords:

hydraulics, hydraulic spillways, swirling flow, swirler, speed / velocity, flow rate

Abstract

The construction and reconstruction of waterworks sets a number of scientific and engineering tasks that require a new approach to their solution. One of the promising areas for solving these and a number of other problems is the use of swirling water flows in hydrotechnical facilities. The article presents the results of physical simulation of spillway counter-vortex systems. The model had a damping chamber diameter of 0.15 m and was tested at a head up to 8 mH2O and a flow rate up to 0.11 m3/s. As a result of the conducted experiments, the values of the flow coefficient of the entire system were obtained. The water-carrying capacity was determined for several modes of operation of the model by means of a combination of switching valves that brought water to the inlet nozzles of the model. In addition, a change in the mode of operation of the model was carried out by changing the vacuum in the near-vortex zone of the counter-vortex flow in a wide range.

A self-similarity of the flow coefficient by the head and the Reynolds number has been established. The physical modelling has made it possible to formulate a well-grounded approach to the hydraulic calculation of counter-vortex spillway systems. One of the most important issues studied experimentally in the process of the described hydraulic tests was the determination of the energy damping capacity of counter-vortex spillways, reflecting their effectiveness. The energy damping capacity was determined by the energy damping factor, reduced to the general head in the model. The article presents the main schemes of local water flow swirlers for the formation of a counter-vortex flow, which can be used in hydrotechnical practice. Some of their geometric and hydraulic characteristics are considered. A simplified scheme of hydraulic calculation of a counter-vortex spillway structure for various types of swirlers and constructive solutions of a spillway system (an open type or an underground tunnel) is proposed. The authors compared the efficiency of the proposed method for damping the energy of the spillway flow and the hydraulic scheme with a sudden expansion of the flow according to the Borda formula. The counter-vortex method of damping the energy of the transit flow has a much higher efficiency in comparison with sudden expansion. The study suggests directions for further research on complex counter-vortex flows.

Author Biographies

Valeriy Volshanik, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Yaroslavskoye highway, 26, Moscow, Russia, 129337

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Hydraulics and Hydrotechnical engineering

Genrikh Orekhov, Moscow State University of Civil Engineering Yaroslavskoye highway, 26, Moscow, Russia, 129337

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate professor

Department of Hydraulics and Hydrotechnical engineering

References

  1. Huang, G., Hu, H., Wang, C., Du, L. (2017). Shock waves and water wing in slit-type energy dissipaters. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 29 (3), 504–509. doi: 10.1016/s1001-6058(16)60762-x
  2. Chen, H., Xu, W., Deng, J., Niu, Z., Liu, S., Wang, W. (2010). Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Hydraulic Characteristics of Discharge Tunnel with Vortex Drop. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 22 (4), 582–589. doi: 10.1016/s1001-6058(09)60091-3
  3. Gur'ev, A. P., Hanov, N. V., Volgin, N. A. (2015). Vliyanie konstruktivnyh parametrov vodoboynogo kolodca na gashenie energii potoka. Prirodoobustroystvo, 4, 48–51.
  4. Sudol'skiy, G. A. (2016). Gidravlicheskie issledovaniya dlya obosnovaniya konstrukcii stupenchatogo vodosbrosa Boguchanskoy GES. Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo, 8, 21–30.
  5. Wu, J., Yao, L., Ma, F., Wu, W. (2014). Hydraulics of a multiple slit-type energy dissipater. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 26 (1), 86–93. doi: 10.1016/s1001-6058(14)60010-x
  6. Ma, F., Xu, Z., Wu, J. (2015). Flow choking over weir flow slit-type flip buckets. Journal of Hydrodynamics, Ser. B, 27 (6), 907–912. doi: 10.1016/s1001-6058(15)60553-4
  7. Nan' Fen, Kozlov, D. V., Rumyancev, I. S. (2015). Gidravlicheskie issledovaniya stupenchatyh vodosbrosov razlichnyh konstrukciy. Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo, 8, 29–37.
  8. Bayon, A., Toro, J. P., Bombardelli, F. A., Matos, J., López-Jiménez, P. A. (2017). Influence of VOF technique, turbulence model and discretization scheme on the numerical simulation of the non-aerated, skimming flow in stepped spillways. Journal of Hydro-Environment Research. doi: 10.1016/j.jher.2017.10.002
  9. Messa, G. V., De Lima Branco, R., Filho, J. G. D., Malavasi, S. (2018). A combined CFD-experimental method for abrasive erosion testing of concrete. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 66 (1), 121–128. doi: 10.1515/johh-2017-0042
  10. Zamankhan, P. (2015). Simulation of Cavitation Water Flows. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015, 1–16. doi: 10.1155/2015/872573
  11. Sliva, I. V., Lapin, G. G. (2017). Avariya na vodosbrosnyh sooruzheniyah gidrouzla Orovill. Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo, 11, 44–51.
  12. Lempérière, F. (2017). Dams and Floods. Engineering, 3 (1), 144–149. doi: 10.1016/j.eng.2017.01.018
  13. Dehdar-behbahani, S., Parsaie, A. (2016). Numerical modeling of flow pattern in dam spillway’s guide wall. Case study: Balaroud dam, Iran. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55 (1), 467–473. doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2016.01.006
  14. Zuykov, A. L. (2010). Gidrodinamika cirkulyacionnyh techeniy. Moscow: Izd-vo ASV, 216.
  15. Volshanik, V. V., Zuykov, A. L., Orekhov, G. V., Churin, P. S. (2013). Propusk holostyh raskhodov cherez turbinnyy blok sredne- ili vysokonapornoy GES (Chast' 1). Gidrotekhnicheskoe stroitel'stvo, 4, 51–56.
  16. GOST 8.009-84. Gosudarstvennaya sistema obespecheniya edinstva izmereniy. Normiruemye metrologicheskie harakteristiki sredstv izmereniy (2006). Moscow.
  17. Volshanik, V. V., Zuykov, A. L., Mordasov, A. P., Krivchenko, G. I. (1990). Zakruchennye potoki v gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzheniyah. Sankt-Peterburg: Energoatomizdat, 280.
  18. Shchukin, V. K., Halatov, A. A. (1982). Teploobmen, massoobmen i gidrodinamika zakruchennyh potokov v osesimmetrichnyh kanalah. Moscow: Mashinostroenie, 200.
  19. Gidravlicheskie raschety vodosbrosnyh gidrotekhnicheskih sooruzheniy (1988). Moscow: Energoatomizdat, 233–248.
  20. Orekhov, G. V. (2008). Vodnye ob'ekty na urbanizirovannyh territoriyah i inzhenernye sistemy aeracii i zamknutogo vodooborota. Ekologiya urbanizirovannyh territoriy, 2, 88–93.
  21. Zuykov, A. L., Orekhov, G. V.‚ Volshanik, V. V. (2013). Raspredelenie azimutal'nyh skorostey v laminarnom kontrvihrevom techenii. Vestnik MGSU, 5, 150–161.
  22. Pilipenko, O. V. (1982). Dinamicheskie harakteristiki truboprovodov pri vrashchatel'no-postupatel'nom dvizhenii zhidkosti s obrazovaniem kavitacionnoy polosti. Gidrodinamika energeticheskih ustanovok. Kyiv: Naukova dumka, 94–100.

Downloads

Published

2018-02-20

How to Cite

Volshanik, V., & Orekhov, G. (2018). Substantiation of counter­vortex spillway structures of hydrotechnical facilities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(8 (91), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123918

Issue

Section

Energy-saving technologies and equipment