Defining the measures to rationally manage the sustainable development of agricultural land use
Keywords:management of development, dynamics of agricultural production indicators, land market, land plots, land use, land reform
The issue of socio-economic development of rural areas was explored. It was substantiated that the state policy should be aimed at mobilizing labor, financial, material and organizational resources, strengthening the social security of rural population, rehabilitation of social infrastructure, development of entrepreneurship, and maintaining ecological stability. It was proved that within the integrated management of the development of rural areas, the development of the system of local self-government in rural territory communities requires special attention.
The factors that led to an unprecedented socio-economic and ecological crisis in agricultural land use were explored. Based on the solution of the optimization problem, the negative trends in the dynamics of key indicators of agricultural production, determined especially clearly on the basis of the results of the correlation data analysis. The obtained mathematical model of the dynamics makes it possible to foresee the consequences of unsustainable management of the development and even to predict the sad ending, unless certain priority factors of management are accepted. The prediction based on such a mathematical model of dynamics can be made by any indicators of agricultural production.
It was noted that the modern period of development of land relations in rural areas will be able to satisfy the interests of the peasants only on condition of harmonious combination of economy of different spheres of activity in rural areas, which are reinforced one after another. The innovative approach to ensuring deficit-free balance of humus in soil as a condition for the sustainable development of agricultural land use was substantiated. It was determined that the policy, aimed at the environmental land use stabilization is based on the development of organizational-legal forms of economy of a cooperative type, based on the common share ownership of land plots of land share owners.
Kouz, R. (1993). Firma, rynok i pravo. SShA. Ekonomika, politika, ideologi, 8, 35–38.
Coass, R. (1960). The problem of Social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1).
Enemark, S. (2005). Understanding the Land Management Paradigm. Innovative Technology for Land Administration. Proceeding of a Symposium held by FIG Commision 7 on 24 and 25 June, 2005 at the University of Wisconsim. State Historical Society in Madison, Wisconcim. State Historical Society in Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 17–27.
Williamson, I., Enemark, S. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. ESPiPress, 487.
Molen, P., Lemmen, C. F. (2004). Unconvential approaches to land administration. UТ. FIG, Nairoby Kenya.
Molen, P. V. D., Silayo, E. H., Tuladhar, A. M. (2008). Land Administration Policies and Systems. Comparative Study to Land Policy in 9 Countries in Africa and Asia. FIG Working Week, Stockholm, 6.
Budget Summary fnd Annual Performance Plan, Financial Year 2010 (2010). USDA, 12.
Tyson, A. (2013). European Structural and Investment Funds 2014–2020: Support to higher education. DG HE, Dublin. Available at: http://eu2013.ie/media/eupresidency/content/documents/highereducationdgmeeting/Tyson-(Day-1).pdf
Rainert, E. (2015). Yak bahati krainy zabahatily i chomu bidni krainy lyshaiutsia bidnymy. Kyiv: Tempora, 444.
Monke, J. (2016). Agricultural Research: Background and Issues. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40819.pdf
Dobriak, D. S., Babmindra, D. I. (2006). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady reformuvannia zemlekorystuvannia v rynkovykh umovakh. Kyiv: Urozhai, 336.
Tretiak, A. M. (2011). Napriamy i zakhody po zavershenniu zemelnoi reformy. Zemelne pravo: teoriya i praktyka, 10, 10–17.
Bystriakov, I. K., Novotorov, O. S., Nikolaienko, T. S. et. al. (2002). Deiaki instytutsionalni aspekty zemelnykh vidnosyn v Ukraini: stan ta napriamy vdoskonalennia. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, RVPS Ukrainy, 134.
Martyn, A. H. (2011). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia rynku zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia v Ukraini. Zemelne pravo, 10, 18–20.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2018 Valery Gorlachuk, Olena Lazarieva, Svitlana Belinska, Yuri Potapsky, Olha Petryshche
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Our journal abides by the Creative Commons CC BY copyright rights and permissions for open access journals.
Authors, who are published in this journal, agree to the following conditions:
1. The authors reserve the right to authorship of the work and pass the first publication right of this work to the journal under the terms of a Creative Commons CC BY , which allows others to freely distribute the published research with the obligatory reference to the authors of the original work and the first publication of the work in this journal.
2. The authors have the right to conclude separate supplement agreements that relate to non-exclusive work distribution in the form in which it has been published by the journal (for example, to upload the work to the online storage of the journal or publish it as part of a monograph), provided that the reference to the first publication of the work in this journal is included.