Defining the measures to rationally manage the sustainable development of agricultural land use

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.140763

Keywords:

management of development, dynamics of agricultural production indicators, land market, land plots, land use, land reform

Abstract

The issue of socio-economic development of rural areas was explored. It was substantiated that the state policy should be aimed at mobilizing labor, financial, material and organizational resources, strengthening the social security of rural population, rehabilitation of social infrastructure, development of entrepreneurship, and maintaining ecological stability. It was proved that within the integrated management of the development of rural areas, the development of the system of local self-government in rural territory communities requires special attention.

The factors that led to an unprecedented socio-economic and ecological crisis in agricultural land use were explored. Based on the solution of the optimization problem, the negative trends in the dynamics of key indicators of agricultural production, determined especially clearly on the basis of the results of the correlation data analysis. The obtained mathematical model of the dynamics makes it possible to foresee the consequences of unsustainable management of the development and even to predict the sad ending, unless certain priority factors of management are accepted. The prediction based on such a mathematical model of dynamics can be made by any indicators of agricultural production.

It was noted that the modern period of development of land relations in rural areas will be able to satisfy the interests of the peasants only on condition of harmonious combination of economy of different spheres of activity in rural areas, which are reinforced one after another. The innovative approach to ensuring deficit-free balance of humus in soil as a condition for the sustainable development of agricultural land use was substantiated. It was determined that the policy, aimed at the environmental land use stabilization is based on the development of organizational-legal forms of economy of a cooperative type, based on the common share ownership of land plots of land share owners.

Author Biographies

Valery Gorlachuk, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University 68 Desantnykiv str., 10, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 54003

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of Department, Honored Worker of Science and Technology of Ukraine

Department of Land Management

Olena Lazarieva, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University 68 Desantnykiv str., 10, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 54003

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Land Management

Svitlana Belinska, Petro Mohyla Black Sea National University 68 Desantnykiv str., 10, Mykolaiv, Ukraine, 54003

PhD, Assosiate Professor

Department of Accounting and Audit

Yuri Potapsky, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya Shevchenka str., 13, Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine, 32300

PhD

Department of Geodesy and Land Management

Olha Petryshche, State Agrarian and Engineering University in Podilya Shevchenka str., 13, Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine, 32300

PhD

Department of Geodesy and Land Management

References

Kouz, R. (1993). Firma, rynok i pravo. SShA. Ekonomika, politika, ideologi, 8, 35–38.

Coass, R. (1960). The problem of Social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3 (1).

Enemark, S. (2005). Understanding the Land Management Paradigm. Innovative Technology for Land Administration. Proceeding of a Symposium held by FIG Commision 7 on 24 and 25 June, 2005 at the University of Wisconsim. State Historical Society in Madison, Wisconcim. State Historical Society in Madison, Wisconsin, USA, 17–27.

Williamson, I., Enemark, S. (2010). Land Administration for Sustainable Development. ESPiPress, 487.

Molen, P., Lemmen, C. F. (2004). Unconvential approaches to land administration. UТ. FIG, Nairoby Kenya.

Molen, P. V. D., Silayo, E. H., Tuladhar, A. M. (2008). Land Administration Policies and Systems. Comparative Study to Land Policy in 9 Countries in Africa and Asia. FIG Working Week, Stockholm, 6.

Budget Summary fnd Annual Performance Plan, Financial Year 2010 (2010). USDA, 12.

Tyson, A. (2013). European Structural and Investment Funds 2014–2020: Support to higher education. DG HE, Dublin. Available at: http://eu2013.ie/media/eupresidency/content/documents/highereducationdgmeeting/Tyson-(Day-1).pdf

Rainert, E. (2015). Yak bahati krainy zabahatily i chomu bidni krainy lyshaiutsia bidnymy. Kyiv: Tempora, 444.

Monke, J. (2016). Agricultural Research: Background and Issues. Congressional Research Service. Available at: https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40819.pdf

Dobriak, D. S., Babmindra, D. I. (2006). Ekoloho-ekonomichni zasady reformuvannia zemlekorystuvannia v rynkovykh umovakh. Kyiv: Urozhai, 336.

Tretiak, A. M. (2011). Napriamy i zakhody po zavershenniu zemelnoi reformy. Zemelne pravo: teoriya i praktyka, 10, 10–17.

Bystriakov, I. K., Novotorov, O. S., Nikolaienko, T. S. et. al. (2002). Deiaki instytutsionalni aspekty zemelnykh vidnosyn v Ukraini: stan ta napriamy vdoskonalennia. Kyiv: NAN Ukrainy, RVPS Ukrainy, 134.

Martyn, A. H. (2011). Mekhanizmy derzhavnoho rehuliuvannia rynku zemel silskohospodarskoho pryznachennia v Ukraini. Zemelne pravo, 10, 18–20.

Downloads

Published

2018-08-21

How to Cite

Gorlachuk, V., Lazarieva, O., Belinska, S., Potapsky, Y., & Petryshche, O. (2018). Defining the measures to rationally manage the sustainable development of agricultural land use. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (94), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.140763

Issue

Section

Control processes