Assessing the impact of parameters for the last mile logistics system on creation of the added value of goods

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142523

Keywords:

last mile logistics, transportation route, transportation cost, added value, variability

Abstract

stock load along the same transportation system. The criterion evaluates the level of gain in the added value of goods as a result of the delivery of goods within a retail network under condition of minimizing the cost of transporting one ton. We have designed an extreme plan for the full­factor experiment with three levels of parameter variation. It was determined that demand for transportation within a retail chain in a big city is discrete in character. A statistical analysis of the volumes of a transportation order has allowed us to draw a conclusion on the possibility to describe a given magnitude using a binomial distribution law. An experiment was conducted using a service polygon of the retail chain’s customers in a large city. Based on 9 constructed alternative last mile logistics systems, we investigated the influence of transportation demand variability on forming the levels of vehicles’ load along routes. The statistical data received provided the basis for calculating the cost of transporting one ton of cargo and estimating the size of the excessive added value to goods. We have assessed the level of variability in the size of the total and the mean added value of goods. It was determined that the transportation process within a retail chain can generate a gain in the total added value across the entire chain amounting to 444.5 percent (12 routes within a transportation system) with the mean value for one multi­stop route of 37.03 percent. We present assessment of the effective area of the last mile logistics, which is guaranteed under condition for a slight fluctuation in the level of vehicles’ load. This corresponds to the value for a variation coefficient of the rolling stock load in the range from 0 to 10 percent. Along with this, it has been established that the most sensitive to fluctuations in the volume of order is the rolling stock of small and medium cargo capacity.

Author Biographies

Alexander Rossolov, О. М. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Marshala Bazhanova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport Systems and Logistics

Nadezhda Popova, Kharkiv Institute of Trade and Economics of Kyiv National University of Trade and Economics Otakara Yarosha lane, 8, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61045

Doctor of Economics Science, Associate Professor

Department of Marketing

Denis Kopytkov, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University Yaroslava Mudroho str., 25, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport Technologies

Halyna Rossolova, PJSC “Kharkiv Tile Plant” Moskovskyi ave., 297, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61106

Head of Department

Department of Planning and Control

Helen Zaporozhtseva, Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University Yaroslava Mudroho str., 25, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Road Traffic Organization and Safety

References

  1. Oliveira, F. L., Oliveira Junior, A. da R., Bessa Rebelo, L. M. (2017). Adapting transport modes to supply chains classified by the uncertainty supply chain model: A case study at Manaus Industrial Pole. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering, 5 (1), 39–43. doi: https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2017.5775
  2. Rossolov, A., Kopytkov, D., Kush, Y., Zadorozhna, V. (2017). Research of effectiveness of unimodal and multimodal transportation involving land kinds of transport. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (89)), 60–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.112356
  3. Jourquin, B., Limbourg, S. (2007). Une procédure d'affectation multi-flux et multimodale appliquée aux réseaux transeuropéens de fret. les Cahiers Scientifiques du Transport, 52, 9–25.
  4. Limbourg, S., Jourquin, B. (2009). Optimal rail-road container terminal locations on the European network. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 45 (4), 551–563. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.12.003
  5. Naumov, V. (2015). Development of a model for international cargo delivery process. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 4 (3 (24)), 33–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2015.47954
  6. Nuzzolo, A., Coppola, P., Comi, A. (2013). Freight transport modeling: Review and future challenges. International Journal of Transport Economics, XL (2), 151–181.
  7. Nuzzolo, A., Crisalli, U., Comi, A. (2008). A demand model for international freight transport by road. European Transport Research Review, 1 (1), 23–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12544-008-0003-0
  8. Oliveira, F. L. (2014). Uncertainty supply chain model and transport in its deployments. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 5 (2), 480–492. doi: https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v5i2.167
  9. Crainic, T. G., Montreuil, B. (2016). Physical Internet Enabled Hyperconnected City Logistics. Transportation Research Procedia, 12, 383–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2016.02.074
  10. United Nations Report. World Urbanization Prospects: The 2014 Revision. Available at: https://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/publications/files/wup2014-highlights.pdf
  11. Kin, B., Ambra, T., Verlinde, S., Macharis, C. (2018). Tackling Fragmented Last Mile Deliveries to Nanostores by Utilizing Spare Transportation Capacity – A Simulation Study. Sustainability, 10 (3), 653. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030653
  12. Gevaers, R. (2013). Evaluation of innovations in B2C last mile. B2C Reverse & Waste Logistics; University of Antwerp: Antwerp, Belgium, 280.
  13. Arvidsson, N. (2013). The milk run revisited: A load factor paradox with economic and environmental implications for urban freight transport. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 51, 56–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.04.001
  14. Gonzalez-Feliu, J. (2008). Models and methods for the City Logistics: The Two-Echelon Capacitated Vehicle Routing Problem. Politecnico di Torino, 148.
  15. Ranieri, L., Digiesi, S., Silvestri, B., Roccotelli, M. (2018). A Review of Last Mile Logistics Innovations in an Externalities Cost Reduction Vision. Sustainability, 10 (3), 782. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030782
  16. Aized, T., Srai, J. S. (2013). Hierarchical modelling of Last Mile logistic distribution system. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 70 (5-8), 1053–1061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5349-3
  17. Bates, O., Wise, S., Davies, N., Friday, A., Allen, J., Cherrett, T. et. al. (2018). Transforming Last-mile Logistics. Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems – CHI ’18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174100
  18. Lim, S. F. W. T., Rabinovich, E., Rogers, D. S., Lasester, T. M. (2016). Last-mile Supply Network Distribution in Omnichannel Retailing: A Configuration-Based Typology. Foundations and Trends® in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 10 (1), 1–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/0200000045
  19. Nefiodov, N. (2017). Modification of Сlark and Wright vehicle routing problem algorithm. Automobile transport, 40, 7–11.
  20. Cao, B. (2012). Solving Vehicle Routing Problems Using an Enhanced Clarke-Wright Algorithm: A Case Study. Computational Logistics, 190–205. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33587-7_14
  21. Srivastava, S. K., Jain, D. (2010). An Industrial application of modified Clarke & Wright algorithm. Udyog Pragati, 34 (1), 8–15.
  22. Doyuran, T., Çatay, B. (2008). Two enhanced savings functions for the Clark-Wright algorithm. Management in Logistics Networks and Nodes: Concepts, Technology and Applications, Series on Operations and Technology Management (8). Erich Schmidt Verlag, Berlin, 245–258.
  23. Cheikh, M., Ratli, M., Mkaouar, O., Jarboui, B. (2015). A variable neighborhood search algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with multiple trips. Electronic Notes in Discrete Mathematics, 47, 277–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.endm.2014.11.036
  24. Battarra, M., Golden, B., Vigo, D. (2008). Tuning a parametric Clarke–Wright heuristic via a genetic algorithm. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59 (11), 1568–1572. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602488
  25. Paessens, H. (1988). The savings algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 34 (3), 336–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90154-3
  26. Dhake, R. J., Rajhans, N. R., Bhole, N. P. (2017). K-Means + Clarke & Wright algorithm for optimization of vehicle mounted drinking water purification units – A Case Study. Industrial Engineering Journal, 10 (1), 42–46.
  27. Comi, A., Rosati, L. (2013). CLASS: A City Logistics Analysis and Simulation Support System. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 87, 321–337. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.613
  28. Palacios-Argüello, L., Gonzalez-Feliu, J., Gondran, N., Badeig, F. (2018). Assessing the economic and environmental impacts of urban food systems for public school canteens: case study of Great Lyon region. European Transport Research Review, 10 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-018-0306-8

Downloads

Published

2018-09-18

How to Cite

Rossolov, A., Popova, N., Kopytkov, D., Rossolova, H., & Zaporozhtseva, H. (2018). Assessing the impact of parameters for the last mile logistics system on creation of the added value of goods. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (95), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142523

Issue

Section

Control processes