Determination of mathematical model of transport mobility of population

Віктор Костянтинович Доля, Ігор Євгенович Іванов

Abstract


A series of recent studies shows that changes in social, economic and environmental indicators and urban passenger transportation parameters lead to a distribution of passenger flows, both between urban public transports and separate routes.

Previously, it was believed that the transport mobility depends mainly on the number of urban population and the level of car ownership, but today there are more factors. Therefore, specialists focused their attention on studying the effect of urban population age and sex, trip purpose, income levels, the city or suburb, trip time etc. on the transport mobility.

The paper considers the impact of transport, city planning, social and economic factors on the transport mobility. It allows confirming that the overall population mobility is the proportion of the urban population number, car ownership level, of transport and route network density.

As a result of the research, it was found that the effect of such factors as the number of urban population, level of car ownership, transport network density on the urban population mobility is directly proportional and the effect of route network density is inversely proportional. In particular, an increase of car ownership leads to an increase of driving the individual transport, which reduces passenger flows, number of routes and route network density respectively


Keywords


transport; population; mobility; factor; car ownership; density; network

References


Доля, В. К. Пасажирські перевезення [Текст] / В. К. Доля. – Х.: Вид-во „Форт”, 2011. – 507 с.

Ефремов, И. С. Теория городских пассажирских перевозок [Текст] / Ефремов И. С., Кобозев В. М., Юдин В. А. – М. : Высшая школа, 1980. – 535 с.

Mattson, J. Travel Behavior and Mobility of Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations: Evidence from the National Household Travel Survey [Текст] / J. Mattson. – Fargo, 2012. – 49 p.

J.Simpson, B. Urban public transport today [Текст] / B. J.Simpson. – E&FN Spon, 2003. – 222 p.

Iles, R. Public Transport in Developing Countries [Текст] / R. Iles. – Еlsevier, 2005. – 478 p.

Doi, K. Looking at sustainable urban mobility through a cross-assessment model within the framework of land-use and transport integration [Текст] / K. Doi, M. Kii. – IATSS Research, 2012. – Vol. 35. – P. 62-70.

Frändberg, L. More or less travel: personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort [Текст] / L. Frändberg, B.Vilhelmson. – Journal of Transport Geography, 2011. – Vol. 19, Iss. 6. – P. 1235–1244.

Bocarejo S., J. P. Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments [Текст] / J. P. Bocarejo S., D. R. Oviedo H. – Journal of Transport Geography, 2012. – Vol. 24. – P. 142-154.

Kim, S. Assessing mobility in an aging society: Personal and built environment factors associated with older people’s subjective transportation deficiency in the US [Текст] / S. Kim. – Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2011. – Vol. 14, Iss. 5. – P. 422–429.

Дрейпер, Н. Прикладной регрессионный анализ. Множественная регрессия / Н Дрейпер, Г Смит. – М. : Диалектика, 2007. -912 с.

Системологія на транспорті. Технологія наукових досліджень і

технічної творчості [Текст] / [ Гаврилов Е. В., Дмитриченко М. Ф., Доля В. К. та ін.]; за ред. М. Ф. Дмитриченка. – К. : Знання України, 2007. – 318 с.

Dolya, V. (2011). Passenger traffic. Kharkiv: Publisher “Fort”, 507.

Efremov, I., Kobozev V., Yudin, V. (1980). The theory of urban passenger transport. Moscow: Higher School, 535.

Mattson, J. (2012). Travel Behavior and Mobility of Transportation-Disadvantaged Populations: Evidence from the National Household Travel Survey. Fargo, 49.

J.Simpson, B. (2003). Urban public transport today. E&FN Spon, 222.

Iles, R. (2005). Public Transport in Developing Countries. Еlsevier, 478.

Doi, K., Kii, M. (2012). Looking at sustainable urban mobility through a cross-assessment model within the framework of land-use and transport integration. IATSS Research, 35, 62-70.

Frändberg, L., Vilhelmson. B. (2011). More or less travel: personal mobility trends in the Swedish population focusing gender and cohort. Journal of Transport Geography, 19, 6, 1235-1244.

Bocarejo S., J. P., Oviedo H., D. R. (2012). Transport accessibility and social inequities: a tool for identification of mobility needs and evaluation of transport investments. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 142-154.

Kim, S. (2011). Assessing mobility in an aging society: Personal and built environment factors associated with older people’s subjective transportation deficiency in the US. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 14,5, 422-429.

Draper, N., Smit, G. (2007). Applied Regression Analysis. Multiple Regression. Moscow: Dialectics, 912.

Dmytrychenko, M. and other (2007). Systemology transport. Technology research and technical work. Kyiv: Knowledge of Ukraine, 318.


GOST Style Citations








Copyright (c) 2014 Віктор Костянтинович Доля, Ігор Євгенович Іванов

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

ISSN (print) 1729-3774, ISSN (on-line) 1729-4061