Constructing and exploring the model to form the road map of enterprise development

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.179185

Keywords:

optimal parameters, mathematical model, step-by-step development, investment, road map, strategic network

Abstract

The study addresses the task on determining the optimal road map for the enterprise development – the choice of the sequence of projects and their parameters, which would ensure the achievement of the goal taking into consideration the basic requirements and constraints. The optimization of the structure and parameters of the development road map is carried out based on the "strategic network" that makes it possible to form alternative variants of the road map of development. This network is based on the principle of the formation of transport networks, and the space "time – indicators of the enterprise state" is accepted as the analogue of the topological space.

The elements of the strategic network – "nodes" – are the enterprise states and the projects that correspond to network transitions from one state to another. The network parameters include: duration of transition from state to state, determined by the intensity of project activities; duration of the project funding process; beginning of the project implementation (transition to a new stage). These parameters determine the following characteristics of the projects that form the characteristics of the road map: project costs; root mean square deviation of project costs; financial result after the project implementation; root mean square deviation of the financial result after the project implementation.

The model for establishing the optimal structure and parameters of the road map of the enterprise development was developed. This model makes it possible to determine the optimal road map of the enterprise development, taking into consideration the possibility of varying the time parameters: time of beginning of each stage, duration of transition from stage to stage, duration of funding phases. The model takes into consideration the probabilistic nature of investment costs and inflows of the funds of an enterprise after the implementation of development activities.

Experimental studies on the formation of a road map based on the developed model were carried out, which proved its operation capacity and reliability. The model can find a wide practical application in solving the issues on the construction of road maps of a step-by-step increase in production, or a phased replacement of equipment (technical development)

Author Biographies

Svitlana Onyshсhenko, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Director

Educational and Scientific Institute of Marine Business

 

Alla Bondar, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Logistic Systems and Projects Management

Vera Andrievska, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Logistic Systems and Projects Management

Nadiia Sudnyk, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Fleet Operation and Shipping Technology

Oleh Lohinov, Odessa National Maritime University Mechnikova str., 34, Odessa, Ukraine, 65029

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Transport Law

References

  1. Onyshсhenko, S., Leontieva, A. (2018). Modeling of the optimal composition of the enterprise technical development program. Technology Audit and Production Reserves, 5 (2 (43)), 36–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/2312-8372.2018.146463
  2. Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., Probert, D. R. (2013). Technology Management and Roadmapping at the Firm Level. Technology Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation, 13–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3_2
  3. Kerr, C., Phaal, R. (2015). Visualizing Roadmaps: A Design-Driven Approach. Research-Technology Management, 58 (4), 45–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308x5804253
  4. Zhang, Y., Robinson, D. K. R., Porter, A. L., Zhu, D., Zhang, G., Lu, J. (2016). Technology roadmapping for competitive technical intelligence. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 110, 175–186. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.029
  5. Ahlqvist, T., Valovirta, V., Loikkanen, T. (2012). Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument for forward-looking policy design. Science and Public Policy, 39 (2), 178–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs016
  6. Moehrle, M. G., Isenmann, R., Phaal, R. (Eds.) (2013). Technology Roadmapping for Strategy and Innovation. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33923-3
  7. Vinayavekhin, S., Phaal, R. (2019). Synchronization in Strategic Planning: A Roadmapping Framework. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 1950044. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219877019500445
  8. Flatscher, M., Riel, A., Kösler, T. (2014). The Need for a Structured Approach towards Production Technology Roadmaps in Innovation-Driven Industries. Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement, 251–261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43896-1_22
  9. Zhang, Y., Guo, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, D., Porter, A. L. (2013). A hybrid visualisation model for technology roadmapping: bibliometrics, qualitative methodology and empirical study. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25 (6), 707–724. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.803064
  10. Amer, M., Daim, T. U. (2010). Application of technology roadmaps for renewable energy sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77 (8), 1355–1370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.05.002
  11. Wells, R., Phaal, R., Farrukh, C., Probert, D. (2004). Technology Roadmapping for A Service Organization. Research-Technology Management, 47 (2), 46–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2004.11671619
  12. Lu, H., You, H. (2018). Roadmap Modeling and Assessment Approach for Defense Technology System of Systems. Applied Sciences, 8 (6), 908. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/app8060908
  13. Blackwell, A. F., Phaal, R., Eppler, M., Crilly, N. (2008). Strategy Roadmaps: New Forms, New Practices. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 127–140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87730-1_14
  14. Gerdsri, N., Kocaoglu, D. F. (2007). Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to build a strategic framework for technology roadmapping. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46 (7-8), 1071–1080. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.015
  15. Onishchenko, S. P., Lysenko, YU. G. (2009). Modelirovanie optimal'noy traektorii razvitiya predpriyatiya s uchetom veroyatnostnoy prirody vneshnih usloviy i upushchennyh vygod. Modeli upravleniya v rynochnoy ekonomike, 12, 140–152.
  16. Lai, C., Xu, L., Shang, J. (2019). Optimal planning of technology roadmap under uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1581406
  17. Oliveira, M. G., Phaal, R., Probert, D., Cunha, V. P., Rozenfeld, H. (2011). A starting point for addressing product innovativeness in the Fuzzy Front-End. International Journal of Technology Intelligence and Planning, 7 (4), 309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijtip.2011.045092
  18. Onishchenko, S. P. (2009). Optimizatsiya obektnyh i vremennyh parametrov ekspluatatsionnoy fazy proektov razvitiya predpriyatiy na primere sudohodnyh kompaniy. Metody ta zasoby rozvytku transportnykh system, 15, 70–84.
  19. Gol'dshteyn, E. G., Yudin, D. B. (1969). Zadachi lineynogo programmirovaniya transportnogo tipa. Moscow: «Nauka», 382.
  20. Levit, B. Yu., Livshits, V. N. (1972). Nelineynye setevye transportnye zadachi. Moscow: «Transport», 144.
  21. Onyshchenko, S. P., Korniets, T. Ye. (2015). Evaluation of market risk of projects of vessel acquisition. Innovatsiyna ekonomika, 4, 198–205.

Downloads

Published

2019-09-26

How to Cite

Onyshсhenko S., Bondar, A., Andrievska, V., Sudnyk, N., & Lohinov, O. (2019). Constructing and exploring the model to form the road map of enterprise development. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (101), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.179185

Issue

Section

Control processes