Competence development organizations in project management on the basis of genomic model methodologies

Authors

  • Сергей Дмитриевич Бушуев Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Виктория Борисовна Рогозина Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine, Ukraine
  • Юрий Федерович Ярошенко Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2013.18442

Keywords:

matrix model, scan organizational disease model of organizational competence in project management, the genome project management methodologies

Abstract

The matrix technology for identification of organisational competencies in project management is presented in the article. Matrix elements are the components of organizational competence in the field of project management and project management methodology represented in the structure of the genome. The matrix model of competence in the framework of the adopted methodologies and scanning method for identifying organizational competences formalised. Proposed methods for building effective project management methodologies development organizations assess the competence of organizations in the field of project management, the formation of rational strategies for the development of project management methodologies based on genomic model. Developed a matrix model and scanning technology competency - based organizations methodologies used to ensure the dynamic development organizations through application of the competency approach. The proposed model is a further development of systems for evaluating competence of project managers, project teams and organizations, developed by the International Project Management Association IPMA.

Author Biographies

Сергей Дмитриевич Бушуев, Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine

Dr. Sc., professor

Head of Project management department

Виктория Борисовна Рогозина, Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine

Postgraduate student

Project management department

Юрий Федерович Ярошенко, Kiev National University of Construction and Architecture, Povitroflotskyj pr, 31, Kiev, 03680, Ukraine

PhD (economy)

Docent of Project management department

References

  1. Азаров, Н. Я. Инновационные механизмы управления программами развития [Текст] / Н. Я. Азаров, Ф. А. Ярошенко, С. Д. Бушуев. – К.: Саммит Книга, 2011. – 564 с.
  2. Бушуев, С. Д. Креативные технологии в управлении проектами и программами [Текст] / С. Д. Бушуев, Н. С. Бушуева, И. А Бабаев и др. – К.: Саммит книга, 2010. – 768 с.
  3. Бушуев, С. Д. Геном методологий управления проектами как универсальная модель знаний [Текст] / С. Д. Бушуев, С. И. Неизвесный // Управління розвитком складних систем. – К.: КНУБА, 2013. – № 14. – С. 15-18.
  4. A Framework for Performance Based Competency Standards for Global Level 1 and 2 Project Managers Sydney [Текст]: Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards. – GAPPS, 2007. – 55 с.
  5. ICB 3.0. IPMA Competence Baseline [Текст]. – IPMA, 2007. – 286 с.
  6. Kaplan, R. S. The Balanced Scorecard: Translating stratagem into Action [Текст] / R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton – Boston: Harvard Business School Press. – 1996. – 364 с.
  7. Kerzner, H. Strategic Planning for Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model [Текст] / H. Kerzner // John Wiley & Sons Inc. – 2007. – 212 с.
  8. Kerzner, H. In search of excellence in Project Management [Текст] / H. Kerzner // VNB. – 1998. – 274 с.
  9. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. Reference Manual [Текст]. Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 6GD. 2002. – 186 с.
  10. Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model SM [Текст], Version 1.1 /CMU/SEI-93-TR-025 ESC-TR-93-178. – 1993. – 172 с.
  11. CMM-I. Capability Maturity Model Integration – version 1.1 – for System Engineering and Software Engineering – CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1 continuous representation CMU/SEI-2002-TR-011 ESCTR – 2002. – 165 с.
  12. Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) Knowledge Foundation [Текст]. – PMI. – 2003. – 150 с.
  13. Azarov, N. Ya., Yaroshenko, F. A., & Bushuev, S. D. (2011). Innovative mechanisms for management development programmes. Kyiv: Summit Book, 564.
  14. Bushuev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., & Babayev, I. А. (2010). Creative technologies in managing projects and programs. Kyiv: Summit book, 768.
  15. Bushuev, S. D., Neizvesnuy, S. I. (2013). The genome project management methodologies as a universal model of knowledge. Management of Development of Complex Systems, 14, 15-18.
  16. A Framework for Performance Based Competency Standards for Global Level 1 and 2 Project Managers Sydney: Global Alliance for Project Performance Standards (2007). GAPPS, 55.
  17. ICB 3.0. IPMA Competence Baseline (2007). IPMA, 286.
  18. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating stratagem into Action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 364.
  19. Kerzner, H. (2007). Strategic Planning for Project Management Using a Project Management Maturity Model. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 212.
  20. Kerzner, H. (1998) In search of excellence in Project Management. VNB, 274.
  21. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. Reference Manual. (2002). Nantwich, Cheshire CW5 6GD, 186.
  22. Key Practices of the Capability Maturity Model SM, Version 1.1 /CMU/SEI-93-TR-025 ESC-TR-93-178. 1993, 172.
  23. CMM-I. Capability Maturity Model Integration – version 1.1 – for System Engineering and Software Engineering – CMMI-SE/SW/IPPD/SS, V1.1 continuous representation CMU/SEI-2002-TR-011 ESCTR. 2002, 165.
  24. Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3®) Knowledge Foundation (2003). PMI,150.

Published

2013-10-30

How to Cite

Бушуев, С. Д., Рогозина, В. Б., & Ярошенко, Ю. Ф. (2013). Competence development organizations in project management on the basis of genomic model methodologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(2(65), 49–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2013.18442