The effect of storing temperature and variety features on the culinary properties of potato

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.214930

Keywords:

storage temperature, weight loss, marketable product yield, culinary properties, potato tubers

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the effect of storage temperature on the preservation and culinary properties of different varieties of potatoes. It was established that at a storage temperature of 2…4 °С the yield of marketable products for early ripening varieties is 88.22±1.53 % on average, for medium ripening ones is 96.87±1.09 %. Natural weight loss by tubers of all varieties during the storage period averaged 4.2 %, of which 72.9 % accounted for moisture evaporation, 27.1 % due to weight loss. Storage temperatures 0…2 °С lead to an increase in the natural weight loss to 5.53±0.2 % in early ripening varieties, to 5.21±0.53 % in medium ripening ones. The yield of marketable products for early varieties is, respectively, 87.46±1.37 and 89.92±1.09 %.

In terms of dry matter, starch, and vitamin C, raw protein, the early group of varieties outperform the medium ripening one. The difference in dry matter content between the varieties reached 8.2 %, starch ‒ 7.0 %, sugar ‒ 0.05 %, vitamin C ‒ 5.6 mg/100 g, raw protein ‒ 1.4 %. When stored, the loss of dry matter was in the range of 2.8–5.2 %, starch ‒ 7.1 % of its initial content, while sugars increased to 12.6 %. The losses of vitamin C by the ripening groups were in the range of 14.8–34.5 %.

It was established that the varieties Savannah and Tornado are distinguished by the set of indicators for the content of basic nutrients after harvesting and after storage. The total quality ratio at the end of storage is 0.88 and 0.86, respectively. According to the set of indicators that characterize the culinary properties of potato, the varieties Banba and Christina should rank first both at laying and at the end of storage; among the medium ripening varieties ‒ the variety Setanta.

The overall estimate of potato tuber quality largely depends on the organoleptic characteristics (mealiness, taste, and tuber cooking property). The correlation coefficient is 0.918, 0.845, and 0.733, respectively. The mealiness of potato tubers has a strong direct link to taste (r=0.894) and an inverse strong link to sugar content (r=−0.725). The mealiness of tubers depends on the content of sugars and starch (r=−0.679 and r=0.571). The potato tuber crumb resistance to darkening depends on the content of vitamin C (r=0.872)

Author Biographies

Ludmila Pusik, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Department of Optimization of Technological Systems named after T. Yevsiukov

Vlаdimir Pusik, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Agricultural Sciences, Professor

Department of Agrotechnology and Ecology

Gennadii Postnov, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Professor

Department of Technologies for Processing and Food Industries

Iryna Safronska, Luhansk National Agrarian University Slobozhanska str., 68, Starobilsk, Ukraine, 92703

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management, Statistics and Economic Analysis

Nataliia Ilina, Kharkiv Petro Vasylenko National Technical University of Agriculture Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Assistant

Department of Equipment and Engineering of Processing and Food Industries

Nina Lyubymova, Kharkiv national agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev p/o “Dokuchaevske-2”, Kharkiv dist., Kharkiv reg., Ukraine, 62483

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Forest Management and Life Safety

Galyna Sukhova, Kharkiv national agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev p/o “Dokuchaevske-2”, Kharkiv dist., Kharkiv reg., Ukraine, 62483

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Crop Production

Yana Hrynova, Kharkiv National Agrarian University named after V. V. Dokuchaev p/o “Dokuchaevske-2”, Kharkiv dist., Kharkiv reg., Ukraine, 62483

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Pedagogy, Psychology and Law

References

  1. Dinamika proizvodstva kartofelya v mire v 1961-2019 gg. Top-15 stran-proizvoditeley. Available at: https://potatosystem.ru/dinamika-proizvodstva-kartofelya
  2. Navarre, D. A., Goyer, A., Shakya, R. (2009). Nutritional Value of Potatoes. Advances in Potato Chemistry and Technology, 395–424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-374349-7.00014-3
  3. McNulty, H., Pentieva, K. (2004). Folate bioavailability. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63 (4), 529–536. doi: https://doi.org/10.1079/pns2004383
  4. Diretto, G., Al-Babili, S., Tavazza, R., Papacchioli, V., Beyer, P., Giuliano, G. (2007). Metabolic Engineering of Potato Carotenoid Content through Tuber-Specific Overexpression of a Bacterial Mini-Pathway. PLoS ONE, 2 (4), e350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000350
  5. Ezekiel, R., Singh, N., Sharma, S., Kaur, A. (2013). Beneficial phytochemicals in potato – a review. Food Research International, 50 (2), 487–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2011.04.025
  6. Bovell‐Benjamin, A. C. (2007). Sweet Potato: A Review of its Past, Present, and Future Role in Human Nutrition. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research, 1–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s1043-4526(06)52001-7
  7. Van Jaarsveld, P. J., Marais, D. W., Harmse, E., Nestel, P., Rodriguez-Amaya, D. B. (2006). Retention of β-carotene in boiled, mashed orange-fleshed sweet potato. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19 (4), 321–329. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2004.10.007
  8. Kartoplia: pidsumky y prohnozy. Available at: https://agrotimes.ua/article/kartoplya-pidsumky-j-prognozy/
  9. Yakist chypsiv ta kartopli fri zakladaietsia shche u poli. Available at: https://propozitsiya.com/ua/yakist-chipsiv-ta-kartopli-fri-zakladaietsya-shche-u-poli
  10. oshibok pri hranenii kartofelya. Available at: https://7dach.ru/Exspert/5-oshibok-pri-hranenii-kartofelya-3860.html
  11. Koltunov, V. A., Voitseshyna, N. I., Furdyha, M. M. (2014). Resursnyi potentsial sortymentu kartopli. Kyiv, 323.
  12. Shpaar, D., Bykin, A., Dreger, D. (2004). Kartofel'. Vyrashchivanie, uborka, hranenie. Torzhok: OOO “Variant”, 466.
  13. Podpriatov, H. I., Davydenko, A. Yu. (2016). Kulinarni vlastyvosti bulb riznykh sortiv kartopli. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats NNTs “Instytut zemlerobstva NAAN”, 2, 126–135.
  14. Spear, R. R., Holden, Z. J., Ross, C. F., Weddell, B. J., Pavek, M. J. (2017). Sensory Evaluation of Eleven Baked Russet-type Potato Varieties and Clones. American Journal of Potato Research, 95 (1), 92–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12230-017-9607-z
  15. Taylor, M. A., McDougall, G. J., Stewart, D. (2007). Potato Flavour and Texture. Potato Biology and Biotechnology, 525–540. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-044451018-1/50066-x
  16. Furdyga, M., Vermenko, Y., Sonets, T. (2017). Consumptive qualities of different potato varieties. Plant varieties studying and protection, 13 (1), 100–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.21498/2518-1017.13.1.2017.97382
  17. Kozhushko, N. S., Honcharov, M. D. (2012). Selektsiya sortiv kartopli na yakist. Visnyk Sumskoho natsionalnoho ahrarnoho universytetu. Seriya: Ahronomiya i biolohiya, 9, 140–145.
  18. Kozhushko, N. S., Honcharov, M. D. (2000). Tekhnolohichna otsinka kartopli na prydatnist do promyslovoi pererobky. Kartoplianstvo, 30, 51–60.
  19. Haase, T., Schüler, C., Haase, N. U., Heß, J. (2007). Suitability of Organic Potatoes for Industrial Processing: Effect of Agronomical Measures on Selected Quality Parameters at Harvest and after Storage. Potato Research, 50 (2), 115–141. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-007-9033-6
  20. Puzik, L. M., Bondariev, A. V. (2015). Tekhnolohiнa zberihannia i pererobky kartopli, ovochiv i plodiv. Laboratornyi praktykum. Kharkiv, 141.
  21. Blenkinsop, R. W., Copp, L. J., Yada, R. Y., Marangoni, A. G. (2002). Changes in Compositional Parameters of Tubers of Potato (Solanum tuberosum) during Low-Temperature Storage and Their Relationship to Chip Processing Quality. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50 (16), 4545–4553. doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0255984
  22. Sawicka, B., Kuś, J., Barbaś, P. (2006). Darkening of the pulp of potato tubers in an organic farm and integrated tillage systems. Polish Agricultural Journal, 142, 445–457.
  23. Chemeda, A., Bultosa, G., Dechassa, N. (2014). Effect of Variety and Storage on the Tuber Quality of Potatoes Cultivated in the Eastern Highlands of Ethiopia. Science, Technology and Arts Research Journal, 3 (1), 84. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/star.v3i1.14
  24. Ekspertyza sortiv kartopli. Metodyka provedennia ekspertyzy sortiv roslyn kartopli ta hrup ovochevykh, bashtannykh, priano-smakovykh na prydatnist do poshyrennia v Ukraini (2016). Ministerstvo ahrarnoi polityky ta prodovolstva Ukrainy, 5–10. Available at: https://www.sops.gov.ua/uploads/page/5a5f415f5df23.pdf
  25. Metodychni rekomendatsiyi shchodo provedennia doslidzhen z kartopleiu (2002). Nemishaieva: UAAN, Instytut kartopliarstva, 182.
  26. Puzik, L. M., Koltunov, V. A., Hordienko, I. M., Rozhkov, A. O. (2015). Prohnozuvannia zberezhenosti yakosti plodoovochevoi produktsiyi. Kharkiv, 196.
  27. Horodniy, M. M., Melnychuk, S. D., Honchar, O. M. (2006). Prykladna biokhimiya ta upravlinnia yakistiu produktsiyi roslynnytstva. Kyiv: Aristei. 484.
  28. Kaur, L., Singh, N., Singh Sodhi, N., Singh Gujral, H. (2002). Some properties of potatoes and their starches I. Cooking, textural and rheological properties of potatoes. Food Chemistry, 79 (2), 177–181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0308-8146(02)00129-2
  29. Krochmal-Marczak, B., Sawicka, B., Kiełtyka-Dadasiewicz, A. (2017). Culinary properties of selected potato cultivars in relation to storage. Towaroznawcze Problemy Jakości, 4 (53), 72–81. Available at: http://yadda.icm.edu.pl/yadda/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171499460
  30. Flis, B., Zimnoch-Guzowska, E., Mankowski, D. (2012). Correlations among Yield, Taste, Tuber Characteristics and Mineral Contents of Potato Cultivars Grown at Different Growing Conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, 4 (7). doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v4n7p197
  31. Davydenko, A. Y. (2017). Improving elements of technology preparation of potato tubers for selling. SWorld. URL: https://www.sworld.com.ua/konferbel1/11.pdf
  32. Safronovskaya, G. M. (2020). Kartofel' iz probirki – kachestvo i produktivnost'. Available at: https://glavagronom.ru/articles/Kartofel-iz-probirki--kachestvo-i-produktivnost
  33. Pshechenkov, K. A., Zayruk, V. N., Elanskiy, S. N., Mal'tsev, S. V. (2016). Hranenie kartofelya. Moscow, 128.

Downloads

Published

2020-10-31

How to Cite

Pusik, L., Pusik, V., Postnov, G., Safronska, I., Ilina, N., Lyubymova, N., Sukhova, G., & Hrynova, Y. (2020). The effect of storing temperature and variety features on the culinary properties of potato. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(11 (107), 43–53. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.214930

Issue

Section

Technology and Equipment of Food Production