Development of scientific and methodological approach to quantitative and qualitative assessment of intellectual property management in industrial enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.230262

Keywords:

intellectual property, intangible assets, intellectual potential, quantitative and qualitative assessment of management

Abstract

The competitiveness, market value and income of an enterprise depend on the level of intellectual property management. Therefore, the aim of research is to develop, substantiate and test a scientific and methodological approach to a quantitative and qualitative assessment of the management of intellectual property of industrial enterprises.

 The originality of the proposed approach is that on the basis of the concept of "management of intellectual property" a procedure for current management has been developed, the main stage of which is a quantitative and qualitative assessment. The assessment is based on the structural and logical model, which is built according to two criteria. The criteria make it possible to determine the current state of the use of intellectual property (intangible assets) – a quantitative assessment, and the prospect of further use (intellectual potential) – a qualitative assessment.

A quantitative assessment involves the calculation of indicators characterizing the state of assets, the dynamics of the impact on the market value of the enterprise, the profitability of production, which is proposed to be determined through the net cash flow from operating activities. A qualitative assessment is carried out in terms of components (information and investment, organizational and legal, economic, personnel and motivation), tools and relative indicators that characterize the intellectual potential of an industrial enterprise. The assessment is carried out using a general integral indicator, which is of practical importance, since it shows the existing level of intellectual property management and directions for improvement in the future.

The approbation of the scientific and methodological approach was carried out on the example of three Ukrainian coke-chemical enterprises (CJSC Avdeevka Coke Plant, CJSC Zaporozhkoks, CJSC Yuzhkoks) of the American association SUNCOKE ENERGY, INC and the Polish association J.S.W. S.A. Group. Empirical studies for the period from 2015 to 2019 made it possible to build a scale for assessing the level of intellectual property management according to the Harrington function

Author Biographies

Diana Raiko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

Viktoriia Cherepanova, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

PhD, Professor

Department of Innovative Entrepreneurship Management and International Economic Relations

Ihor Sylka, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

Postgraduate Student

Department of Innovative Entrepreneurship Management and International Economic Relations

Olha Podrez, National Aerospace University "Kharkiv Aviation Institute"

Doctor of Philosophy in Economics, Leading Engineer

Department of Public Administration and Entrepreneurship

Irina Fedorenko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Marketing

References

  1. Holgersson, M., van Santen, S. (2018). The Business of Intellectual Property: A Literature Review of IP Management Research. Stockholm Intellectual Property Law Review, 1 (1), 44–63. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3202847
  2. Adner, R., Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (3), 306–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.821
  3. Teixeira, A. A. C., Ferreira, C. (2019). Intellectual property rights and the competitiveness of academic spin-offs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4 (3), 154–161. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2018.12.002
  4. De Rassenfosse, G., Palangkaraya, A., Webster, E. (2016). Why do patents facilitate trade in technology? Testing the disclosure and appropriation effects. Research Policy, 45 (7), 1326–1336. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.017
  5. Soranzo, B., Nosella, A., Filippini, R. (2017). Redesigning patent management process: an Action Research study. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1100–1121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2016-0226
  6. Holgersson, M., Wallin, M. W. (2017). The patent management trichotomy: patenting, publishing, and secrecy. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1087–1099. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2016-0172
  7. Modic, D., Hafner, A., Damij, N., Cehovin Zajc, L. (2019). Innovations in intellectual property rights management. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 28 (2), 189–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ejmbe-12-2018-0139
  8. Belingheri, P., Leone, M. I. (2017). Walking into the room with IP: exploring start-ups’ IP licensing strategy. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1209–1225. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2016-0227
  9. Aloini, D., Lazzarotti, V., Manzini, R., Pellegrini, L. (2017). IP, openness, and innovation performance: an empirical study. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1307–1327. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2016-0230
  10. De Vries, G., Pennings, E., Block, J. H., Fisch, C. (2016). Trademark or patent? The effects of market concentration, customer type and venture capital financing on start-ups’ initial IP applications. Industry and Innovation, 24 (4), 325–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1231607
  11. Brem, A., Nylund, P. A., Hitchen, E. L. (2017). Open innovation and intellectual property rights. Management Decision, 55 (6), 1285–1306. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/md-04-2016-0223
  12. Lima, F. V. R., Santos, J. A. B. dos. (2018). Intellectual Property Management in Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 6 (9), 109–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol6.iss9.1161
  13. Valdez-Juárez, L. E., García-Pérez-de-Lema, D., Maldonado-Guzmán, G. (2018). ICT and KM, Drivers of Innovation and Profitability in SMEs. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 17 (01), 1850007. doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219649218500077
  14. Maldonado-Guzmán, G., Lopez-Torres, G. C., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Kumar, V., Martinez-Covarrubias, J. L. (2016). Knowledge management as intellectual property. Management Research Review, 39 (7), 830–850. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-02-2015-0024
  15. Miyashita, S., Katoh, S., Anzai, T., Sengoku, S. (2020). Intellectual Property Management in Publicly Funded R&D Program and Projects: Optimizing Principal–Agent Relationship through Transdisciplinary Approach. Sustainability, 12 (23), 9923. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239923
  16. Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H., Miles, I. (2016). Innovation collaboration and appropriability by knowledge-intensive business services firms. Research Policy, 45 (7), 1337–1351. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.03.018
  17. Córdova, F. M., Durán, C. A., Galindo, R. (2016). Evaluation of Intangible Assets and Best Practices in a Medium-sized Port Community. Procedia Computer Science, 91, 75–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.043
  18. Varenyk, V. M., Yevtushenko, Ya. S. (2018). Diagnostic analysis of company assets management efficiency. Skhidna yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia, 1 (12), 117–122. Available at: http://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/12_2018/22.pdf
  19. Semenova, V. G. (2015). Analysis of efficiency of intellectual property companies. Economics: time realities, 2 (18), 263–268. Available at: http://economics.opu.ua/files/archive/2015/n2.html
  20. Semenova, V. (2015). Mathematical model of efficiency evaluation components of enterprise intellectual property management. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 8, 58–62. Available at: http://www.economy.in.ua/?op=1&z=3268&i=12
  21. Semenova, V. G. (2015). Components of the system of intellectual property management enterprises. Economics: time realities, 3 (19), 159–165. Available at: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=26342638
  22. Pavlenko, T. V. (2012). Process of intellectual property management. Ekonomichnyi visnyk NTUU «KPI», 9, 266–270. Available at: https://ela.kpi.ua/handle/123456789/2983
  23. Kuchumova I. Y. (2013). Intellectual Capital in the System of Enterprise Management. Business Inform, 12, 357–364. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2013_12_65
  24. Karnaukh, K. V. (2010). Suchasnyi stan upravlinnia obiektamy promyslovoi vlasnosti v innovatsiyniy diyalnosti sudnobudivnykh pidpryiemstv. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva ta upravlinnia vyrobnytstvom, 2 (54), 64–65. Available at: http://www.ed.ksue.edu.ua/ER/knt/e102_54/e102karn.pdf
  25. Husakovska, T. O. (2009). Upravlinnia intelektualnoiu vlasnistiu pidpryiemstva. Kharkiv, 20. Available at: http://dspace.puet.edu.ua/handle/123456789/9158
  26. Semenova, V. H. (2016) Upravlinnia intelektualnoiu vlasnistiu pidpryiemstva: protsesnyi pidkhid. Odessa: Odeskyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi universytet, 417. Available at: http://dspace.oneu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/5044
  27. Sylka, I. V. (2019). The Theoretical Foundations of Management of Intellectual Property of Industrial Enterprises. Business Inform, 7, 144–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-7-144-153
  28. PrAT "Avdiyivskyi koksokhimichnyi zavod". Available at: https://akhz.metinvestholding.com/ua/about/info
  29. PrAT "Zaporizhkoks". Available at: https://zaporozhcoke.com/informacija-dlja-akcionerov/ustav-obshhestva/?lang=ru
  30. PrAT «Yuzhkoks». Available at: https://bkoks.dp.ua/information_shareholders/
  31. Jastrzębska Spółka Węglowa S.A.'s Investor Relations website. Available at: https://www.jsw.pl/en/investors-relations
  32. SunCoke Energy, Inc. Available at: http://www.suncoke.com/English/investors/sxc/overview/default.aspx
  33. Pro zatverdzhennia Natsionalnoho polozhennia (standartu) bukhhalterskoho obliku. Dokument z0750-99. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0750-99#Text
  34. UNPA Ukrkoks. Available at: http://ukrkoks.com/
  35. Shatskova, L. P. (2014). Pokazateli sostoyaniya i effektivnosti ispol'zovaniya nematerial'nyh aktivov. Mezhdunarodniy ekonomicheskiy forum 2014. Available at: https://be5.biz/ekonomika1/r2014/4097.htm
  36. Raiko, D., Podrez, O., Cherepanova, V., Fedorenko, I., Shypulina, Y. (2019). Evaluation of quality level in managing the development of industrial enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (101)), 17–32. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.177919
  37. Volkov, K., Volkov, S., Kazakova, N. (2017). Improving Quality Score function desirability Harrington. Modern Information Security, 1, 103–108. Available at: http://journals.dut.edu.ua/index.php/dataprotect/article/view/1419

Downloads

Published

2021-04-30

How to Cite

Raiko, D., Cherepanova, V., Sylka, I., Podrez, O., & Fedorenko, I. (2021). Development of scientific and methodological approach to quantitative and qualitative assessment of intellectual property management in industrial enterprises . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (110), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.230262

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 13 (110) (2021): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Диана Валерьевна Райко, Виктория Александровна Черепанова, Игорь Васильевич Силка, Ольга Ивановна Подрез, Ирина Анатолиевна Федоренко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.