Implementation of the concept of corporate social responsibility management for quasi-public sector companies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.256147

Keywords:

financial performance, society, economic situation, macroeconomics, management principles, quasi-public companies

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility affects the financial efficiency of the company, but this influence is most significant under certain environmental conditions, demonstrating a tendency to improve the situation in macroeconomics. However, the very mechanism of such influence remains unexplored. For the practical application of corporate social responsibility for the company’s benefit, it is important to connect corporate social responsibility indicators, environmental parameters with financial metrics. The research purpose is to justify the concept of adaptive management of corporate social responsibility for quasi-public sector companies in the context of macroeconomics changing factors. Research methodology: general scientific methods of cognition: comparison, analysis and synthesis, as well as system-situational, dialectical, abstract-theoretical, structural-functional, and systemic. The study hypothesized that by introducing the impact of the quality of CSR management on the financial performance of a quasi-public sector company, it is possible to provide a high gross domestic product growth rate. The concept of corporate social responsibility management for companies in the quasi-public sector has been developed. It was stated that the largest numerical values of the coefficients for 2018 and 2019 are more than 0.7 units. It was during those years, in accordance with the research results, that low (less than 6 %) inflation and a high GDP growth rate (more than 5 %) took place. Using the concept will make it possible to implement a systematic approach in the management of corporate social responsibility and ensure the conditions for achieving goals in the company of the quasi-public sector

Author Biographies

Nurdaulet Bekenov, Satbayev University

Doctoral Student

Institute of Project Management

Senymgul Dossova, Satbayev University

PhD, Professor

Institute of Project Management

References

  1. Budget Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Available at: https://adilet.zan.kz/eng/docs/K080000095_
  2. Kernebaev, A. S. (2017). Strategic management in the quasi-public sector: Evidence from Kazakhstan. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11 (2), 5–8. Available at: https://www.proquest.com/openview/86a33b7221281a2563773ff268c57d22/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=51667
  3. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16 (4), 691–718. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279616
  4. Chowdhury, H., Hodgson, A., Hasan, M. M. (2022). Does a competitive external labour market affect corporate social responsibility? Evidence from industry tournament incentives. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 33, 100617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2021.100617
  5. Liu, W., Wei, W., Choi, T.-M., Yan, X. (2022). Impacts of leadership on corporate social responsibility management in multi-tier supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 299 (2), 483–496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2021.06.042
  6. Pfajfar, G., Shoham, A., Małecka, A., Zalaznik, M. (2022). Value of corporate social responsibility for multiple stakeholders and social impact – Relationship marketing perspective. Journal of Business Research, 143, 46–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.051
  7. Final rule: Conditions for use of Non-GAAP financial measures. Available at: https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/33-8176.htm
  8. Khan, M., Lockhart, J. (2019). Embedding Corporate Social Responsibility into Business Practice: Lessons Learned from New Zealand. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, 87–105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-21436-4_6
  9. Latapí Agudelo, M. A., Jóhannsdóttir, L., Davídsdóttir, B. (2019). A literature review of the history and evolution of corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 4 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40991-018-0039-y
  10. Zorinova, A. K., Sorokina, E. V. (2017). Implementation of corporate social responsibility within the concept of sustainable development of organization. Economics, 11 (32), 11–14. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/realizatsiya-korporativnoy-sotsialnoy-otvetstvennosti-v-ramkah-ustoychivogo-razvitiya-organizatsii
  11. Chandler, D. (2016). Strategic corporate social responsibility: sustainable value creation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Available at: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/strategic-corporate-social-responsibility/book258527
  12. Chandler, D., Werther, W. B. (2019). Strategic corporate social responsibility: stakeholders, globalization, and sustainable value creation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Strategic-Corporate-Social-Responsibility-Globalization/dp/1452217793
  13. Griffin, A. (2009). New Strategies for Reputation Management: Gaining Control of Issues, Crises & Corporate Social Responsibility. London: Kogan Page. Available at: https://www.abebooks.com/9780749456337/New-Strategies-Reputation-Management-Gaining-0749456337/plp
  14. Kalinskiy, O. I. (2019). Formation of a mechanism for managing an industrial enterprise based on an assessment of its business reputation. Moscow: National University of Science and Technology (MISiS). Available at: https://misis.ru/science/dissertations/2019/3455/
  15. Mack, A. (2009). Working smarter: The need for a new CSR in our changing economy. Available at: https://cutt.ly/qOJ34jf
  16. Agency for Strategic planning and reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan Bureau of National statistics. Available at: https://stat.gov.kz/
  17. Inflation index from 2015 to 2022. Available at: https://cutt.ly/QOKu6ny
  18. Gullo, A. A., Filimonova, N. G. (2018). Analysis of methods for evaluating the efficiency of corporate social responsibility of enterprises. Socio-economic and Humanitarian Journal of Krasnoyarsk State University, 1, 92–106. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/analiz-metodik-otsenki-effektivnosti-korporativnoy-sotsialnoy-otvetstvennosti-predpriyatiy
  19. ISO 26000:2010. Guidance on social responsibility. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/42546.html
  20. Frederick, W. C. (2018). Corporate social responsibility: From founders to millennials. Corporate social responsibility. Business and Society, 2, 3–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/S2514-175920180000002001
  21. Abed, I. A., Hussin, N., Haddad, H., Al-Ramahi, N. M., Ali, M. A. (2022). The Moderating Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on the Relationship between Creative Accounting Determinants and Financial Reporting Quality. Sustainability, 14 (3), 1195. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031195
  22. Lu, H., Liu, X., Falkenberg, L. (2020). Investigating the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) on Risk Management Practices. Business & Society, 61 (2), 496–534. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650320928981
  23. Bekenov, N., Dossova, S. (2021). Corporate social responsibility of the quasi-public sector: principles and processes. Central Asian Economic Review, 2, 92–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.52821/2224-5561-2021-2-92-106

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Bekenov, N., & Dossova, S. . (2022). Implementation of the concept of corporate social responsibility management for quasi-public sector companies . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13 (117), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.256147

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology