Development of bus body technologies in terms of corrosion and durability

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.259927

Keywords:

bus, body, corrosion, corrosion protection, new technologies, adhesion, adhesive mixtures, alucobond, glued side panels

Abstract

The object of this study is the technology of bus bodies and the formation of recommendations for design bodywork subject to the regulated durability of the body introduced into production. Advancing the technology of manufacturing bus bodies implies improving anti-corrosion protection, using new polymeric materials, and reducing the length of welds.

The issue of corrosion resistance of bus bodies has been considered. It is established that the use of new polymeric materials will increase the corrosion resistance of bus bodies while existing technologies weakly protect against corrosion (resource up to 5 years). The peculiarity of this study is that the adhesion of new materials has been tested, with artificial aging, which confirms the durability of glued joints.

According to the old technology, the body was exposed to anticorrosive treatment after welding the cladding with uncovered places left between the frame and body cladding, which provoked corrosion. The main idea is that in the new technology, the cladding is welded or glued after the body frame is fully coated with primer.

New technologies and materials not used in the automotive industry have been proposed. Three variants of technologies were put into production. First: the welding of steel zinc sheets. In welding sites, the frame is covered with conductive primer. It was implemented for school buses (after 7 years, without damage). Second: gluing steel zinc sheets. It was implemented for city buses (after 6 years, without damage). Third: gluing sheets from composite materials not used in the automotive industry. The transition to new adhesive cladding technologies from composite corrosion-resistant materials instead of steel sheet, reduces by 2.5–3 times the length of welds (up to 20 years without damage).

The studies have confirmed the strength of glued joints (cohesion rupture exceeds 95 %). The reliability of glued joints and high corrosion resistance of the body have been confirmed in the operation of buses.

The scope of practical use of the results: bus-building plants.

The reported results are suitable for production of all types while cataphoretic coatings are only for mass production

Author Biographies

Dmytro Ruban, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Automotive Engineering

Lubomir Kraynyk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Automotive Engineering

Hanna Ruban, Cherkasy State Business-College

Lecturer

Department of Fundamental Disciplines

Maria Zakharova, Cherkasy State Business-College

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology

Sergiy Burmistrov, Cherkasy State Business-College

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology

Vladyslav Khotunov, Cherkasy State Business-College

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Engineering and Information Technology

Volodymyr Metelap, Cherkasy State Technological University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Programming Engineering of Automation Systems

References

  1. Regulation No 66 of the Economic Commission for Europe of the United Nations (UN/ECE) – Uniform provisions concerning the approval of large passenger vehicles with regard to the strength of their superstructure. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/6d1479db-1195-41eb-837b-8e0de970dcaf/language-en/format-PDF/source-search
  2. Corrosion Cost and Preventive Strategies in the United States. FHWA-RD-01-156. Available at: https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/39217
  3. Kowarska, I., Korta, J., Kuczek, K., Uhl, T. (2014). Fully Equipped Dynamic Model of a Bus. Shock and Vibration, 2014, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/201952
  4. Ruban, D., Kraynyk, L., Ruban, H., Sosyk, A., Shcherbyna, A., Dudarenko, O., Artyukh, A. (2021). Forecasting the durability of public transport bus bodies depending on operating conditions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (1 (112)), 26–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.238171
  5. Nandhakumar, S., Seenivasan, S., Mohammed Saalih, A., Saifudheen, M. (2021). Weight optimization and structural analysis of an electric bus chassis frame. Materials Today: Proceedings, 37, 1824–1827. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.404
  6. Corrosion Protection ‒ Proof That It Matters (2018). Daimler Trucks North America LLC. Available at: https://thomasbuiltbuses.com/resources/articles/corrosion-protection-proof-that-it-matters/
  7. Saarimaa, V., Kaleva, A., Ismailov, A., Laihinen, T., Virtanen, M., Levänen, E., Väisänen, P. (2022). Corrosion product formation on zinc-coated steel in wet supercritical carbon dioxide. Arabian Journal of Chemistry, 15 (3), 103636. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2021.103636
  8. Calovi, M., Rossi, S., Deflorian, F., Dirè, S., Ceccato, R., Guo, X., Frankel, G. S. (2020). Effects of Graphene-Based Fillers on Cathodic Delamination and Abrasion Resistance of Cataphoretic Organic Coatings. Coatings, 10 (6), 602. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10060602
  9. Ruban, D. P., Kraynyk, L. V., Gryshchuk, A. K. (2021). Demand that go in on the following vehicle body of the bodies of the human transport pid ped hour exploatation. The National Transport University Bulletin, 1 (48), 293–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.33744/2308-6645-2021-1-48-293-301
  10. Ruban, D., Kraynyk, L., Kraynyk, Y., Dzoba, V. (2021). Technological principles for providing the durability of bus bodies in the production process. Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Transport, 12 (2), 106–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.31649/2413-4503-2020-12-2-106-111
  11. Rosales, B. M., Vera, R., de Rincon, O. T., Di Sarli, A., Rocha Valenzuela, J. A., Tidblad, J. (2012). Atmospheric Corrosion. International Journal of Corrosion, 2012, 1–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/174240
  12. Riddle, C. L., Marlow, M. J., Bazydlo, M. J. (2000). Pat. No. US6095594A. Exterior body side cladding attachment for a motor vehicle and related method. No. 09/119,802; declareted: 21.07.1998; published: 01.08.2000. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US6095594A/en
  13. Nelson, W. A. (1999). Pat. No. US5925425A. Plastic cladding and body molding parts. declareted: 10.06.1992; published: 20.07.1999. Available at: https://patents.google.com/patent/US5925425A/en
  14. CQP – 034. Available at: https://www.organoids.com/uploads/tx_bh/organoid_adhesion_test_sika_1407.pdf?mod=153184213

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Ruban, D., Kraynyk, L., Ruban, H., Zakharova, M., Burmistrov, S., Khotunov, V., & Metelap, V. (2022). Development of bus body technologies in terms of corrosion and durability. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(1 (117), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.259927

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems