Analysis of the models of communication barriers of complex projects based on value approach

Authors

  • Тетяна Віталіївна Романів University of Economics and Law "KROK", Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26277

Keywords:

communication, communication barrier, project noise, value, complex project, project communications, communication noise

Abstract

The kinds, types, tools, technologies of communications and communication barriers were analyzed in the paper. Based on the analysis of the studied authors and their works, kinds of communications and communication barriers in projects were newly formed and grouped. The model and the method of the scheme of selection of redistribution of complex projects for the studied enterprises were developed. For an organization that aims to become project-oriented since the complexity of survival in conditions of high competition among similar organizations increases, forming portfolio approach based on value-oriented approach provides reducing communication barriers and noise, thus ultimately ensures sustainable development and implementation of complex projects.

Also, model and method of studying system representation of values by PLC phases were developed and analyzed. This model is represented both mathematically and graphically. It explains the relationship of the project development by the project life cycle phases, the level of human values that are shown in his personal characteristics, through which communication barriers may occur.

When analyzing the communication flow, interested parties reveal themselves in different ways. To date, it is necessary to pay more attention to the problems of overcoming communication barriers and noise in projects since their overcoming (neutralizing) will lead to getting the planned product of the project with the corresponding value laid.

During the study, a pattern of the effect of systemic representation of human values throughout the life cycle on the project results that shows the level of values from the first to the eighth was found.

As a result of the studies, it was found that communication barriers that arise between the interested parties are characterized by gaps between the levels of values of project participants and will be overcome provided understanding of the underlying values of each of the parties.

Author Biography

Тетяна Віталіївна Романів, University of Economics and Law "KROK"

An applicant for a PhD

of Department business administration and project management

References

  1. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (2012). (PMBOK guide) – Project Management Institute – (American National Standard), 489.
  2. ISO/TR 21500:2012. Quality Management – Guidelines to quality in project management (2012). International Organization for Standardization.
  3. Pounds, V. N. (2008). Basics of project management. SPB.: Peter, 336.
  4. Frolov, S. S. (2001). Sociology of organizations. Moscow: Gardariki, 384.
  5. Mishin, S. A. (2006). Project BIZNES: adapted model for Russia. Moscow: AST, 428.
  6. Sharuhyn, A. P. (2005). Psychology of Management: Textbook. St. Petersburg.: Speech, 352.
  7. Verderber, R. (2003). Psihologіya spіlkuvannya. SPB.: PRAYM_EVROZNAK, 320.
  8. Bushuyev, S. D., Bushueva, N. S., Yaroshenko, R. F. (2012). Model harmonization values development programs in organizations turbulence environment. Upravlіnnya rozvitku folding systems. SC. Sciences. Prace. Kiev: KNUBA, 10, 9–13.
  9. Medvedev, A. (2011). Introformatsiyni model calculation manifestation of stakeholders in the project environment: a fuzzy setting. Project management and development of production: Sat. sciences. works. Lugansk: Shidnoukr. nat. Univ them. Dal,. 1 (37), 5–13.
  10. Beck, D., Kovan, K. (2010). Spiral Dynamics driving values, leadership and change: Saint – Petersburg, 415.
  11. Neizvestnij, S. I. (2007). Brain project RSP, 400.
  12. Iacocca, Lee (2007). AN Autobiography with William Novak. N. Y. "Bantam Books", 544.
  13. Boddy, D., Peyton, R. (Ed.) (1999). Fundamentals of Management. St. Petersburg: Izd "Peter", 816.
  14. Verba, V. U., Zagorodnikh, O. G. (2000). Project analysis: Lubid, 360.
  15. Bushueva, S. D. (2009). P2M. Rukovodstvo po upravleniju innovacionnymi proektami i programmami: t. 1, versija 1.2. Kiev: Naukovij Svіt, 173.
  16. Rampersad, H. K. (2005). Individual scorecard. Moscow: ZAO "Olympus-Business", 176.
  17. Archibald, P. (2004). Management of high-tech programs and projects: Company IT DMK Press, 472.

Published

2014-07-24

How to Cite

Романів, Т. В. (2014). Analysis of the models of communication barriers of complex projects based on value approach. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3(70), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.26277

Issue

Section

Control processes