Determining the impact of global-local transformations of property on the formation of nanoeconomics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.277391

Keywords:

market transformations, information economy, instability, property relations, nanoeconomics, institutional architectonics

Abstract

The object of research is the relationship between the processes of formation of the information-network society and the global-local transformation of property relations at the turn of the XX–XXI centuries. The problem has been identified that the limitations of theoretical approaches to explain the content and interrelation of property relations and the social meaning of high-tech development have led to an increase in general socio-economic instability. To solve the problem, the definition of the institution of property as an economic good is provided. A three-level traditional model of public management has been highlighted. It is shown that the existing triple structure of the public sector of economy should acquire a different value content. The new model in the dynamic unity of markets of pure public benefits, public goods, private goods harmonizes public interests, strengthens relations of trust. This model forms the foundations for the formation of nanoeconomics in a broad sense as the forerunner of harmonious institutional architectonics of the economy. Nanoeconomics, as part of baby economics, human economics, and economics of nanotechnology, is based on the principles of rational behavior in making economic decisions within the limits of power. In the depths of baby economics, skills and competencies are formed in handling property. The human economy ensures the proper implementation of property functions. Within the experimental part of the study, a mathematical model of multifactor regression is constructed. The model confirmed the presence of dense dependence (0.9076) of the growth of GDP per capita on the state of distribution of property rights in the national economy. The area of practical use of the results is the post-war reconstruction of Ukraine's economy through the activation of its domestic business potential.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Artomova, State Organization “Institute of the Economy and Forecasting of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine”

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Theory

Tetiana Ostapenko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

Igor Britchenko, State Higher Vocational School Memorial of Prof. Stanislaw Tarnowski in Tarnobrzeg

Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor

Department of Economic Science

References

  1. Coase, R. H. (1992). The Institutional Structure of Production. Chicago: University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Law School Publications, 19. Available at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1033&context=occasional_papers
  2. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press. A Division of Macmillan, Inc. N.Y. Collier Macmillan Publishers London, 450.
  3. Ostrom, E., Walker, J., Gardner, R. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. University of Michigan Press, 382. doi: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9739
  4. Deaton, A. (2013). The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 376.
  5. Donaldson, G. (1984). Managing Corporate Wealth: The Operation of a Comprehensive Financial Goals System. Praeger special studies, 198.
  6. Blasi, J. R., Kruse, D. L. (1992). The New Owners: The Mass Emergence of Employee Ownership in Public Companies and What it Means to American Business. HarperCollins, 368.
  7. Stiglitz, J. E. (2019). People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent. W. W. Norton & Company, 366.
  8. Fan, D., Xiao, C. (2022). Firm-specific political risk: a systematic investigation of its antecedents and implications for vertical integration and diversification strategies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-02-2022-0094
  9. Saha, S., Chowdhury, P. R., Roy, J., Wiejak-Roy, G. (2021). Institutional Imperfections and Buyer-Induced Holdout in Land Acquisition. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 177 (3), 261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2021-0012
  10. Ding, R., Ko, C. Y., Shen, B. (2020). Choosing a Production Joint Venture Partner. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 176 (4), 665. doi: https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2020-0039
  11. Hirose, K., Lee, S.-H., Matsumura, T. (2020). Noncooperative and Cooperative Environmental Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 176 (3), 549. doi: https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2020-0035
  12. Mitra, M., Pal, R., Paul, A., Sharada, P. M. (2020). Equilibrium Coexistence of Public and Private Firms and the Plausibility of Price Competition. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 176 (2), 217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1628/jite-2019-0041
  13. Helpman, E. (Ed.) (1998). General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 315.
  14. Schulte, J. (Ed.) (2005). Nanotechnology: Global Strategies, Industry Trends and Applications. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/0470021071
  15. Sargent, J. F. (2008). Nanotechnology and U.S. Competitiveness: Issues and Options. Available at: https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/RL34493.pdf
  16. Brzezinski, Z. (2012). Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. Basic Books, 224.
  17. Stoett, P. (2019). Global Ecopolitics: Crisis, Governance, and Justice. University of Toronto Press, Higher Education Division, 272.
  18. Paul, T. V. (2023). The Specter of Deglobalization. Current History, 122 (840), 3–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2023.122.840.3
  19. Sagadevan, S., Shahid, M. M., Yiqiang, Z., Oh, W.-C., Soga, T., Anita Lett, J. et al. (2021). Functionalized graphene-based nanocomposites for smart optoelectronic applications. Nanotechnology Reviews, 10 (1), 605–635. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2021-0043
  20. Ikram, R., Mohamed Jan, B., Nagy, P. B., Szabo, T. (2023). Recycling waste sources into nanocomposites of graphene materials: Overview from an energy-focused perspective. Nanotechnology Reviews, 12 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0512
  21. Khatib, M. M. E., Ahmed*, G. (2019). Management of Artificial Intelligence Enabled Smart Wearable Devices for Early Diagnosis and Continuous Monitoring of CVDS. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9 (1), 1211–1215. doi: https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.l3108.119119
  22. Glegg, B. (2011). Armageddon Science: The Science of Mass Destruction. St. Martin’s Press, 304.
  23. Singer, P. W. (2011). Robots at War: The New Battlefield. The Changing Character of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 576.
  24. Domanenko, M. V., Rubanyk, V. Ye. (2002). Vlasnist i pravo vlasnosti: narysy z istoriyi, filosofiyi, teoriyi i praktyky rehuliuvannia vidnosyn vlasnosti v Ukraini. Kharkiv: Fakt, 64.
  25. Ziuz’, D. (2017). The genesis of the property institution and the roleof the state in transformation of property relations. Efektyvnist derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 2 (51), 102–110. Available at: https://epa.nltu.edu.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/310/305
  26. Tarasevych, V. (2018). The power-property and state at the epoch of the first civilizations. Economic Theory, 1, 21–44. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2018.01.021
  27. Magdenko, S. O. (2015). The relationship property as a main component of the formation of a modern market economy of Ukraine. Ekonomika kharchovoi promyslovosti, 7 (4), 3–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.15673/2312-847x.4/2015.56709
  28. Khokhlov, M. P. (2013). The economic content of property in the aspect of socio-economic transformations. Economic Theory, 3, 5–15.
  29. Mandybura, V. O. (2013). Systemic-informational transformation of the institution of property. Economic Theory, 2, 57–73.
  30. Radchenko, Yu. A. (2011). Tangible, Converging and Intellectual Property: an Introduction to the Problem and an Attempt of Categorization. Economic Theory, 1, 21–36.
  31. Maslak, M., Pererva, P. (2023). Formation of economic and legal measures for the development of the market of intellectual property objects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (13 (121)), 113–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.273850
  32. Shlykov, V., Vovianko, S. (2023). Influence of low magnetic fields on human cells, tissues and organs. Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 9, 30–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-8974.2023.9.276841
  33. Popov, S. V., Lebedev, A. V. (2022). Electrodes for lung welding instrument. Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 8, 15–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.20535/2617-8974.2022.8.268826
  34. Hrytsenko, A. (2003). Sumisne-rozdileni vidnosyny: pratsia, vlasnist y vlada. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 3, 50–58.
  35. Grytsenko, A. A. (2022). Economic contradictions of globalization and localization and their modern manifestations. Economic Theory, 4, 5–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2022.04.005
  36. Artemova, T. I. (2006). Stoimost' i tsena: logiko-istoricheskiy protsess formoobrazovaniya. Kyiv: Osnova, 444.
  37. Gegel', G. V. (1990). Filosofiya prava. Moscow: Mysl', 103–106.
  38. Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Cambridge, 256–257.
  39. Artomova, T. (2022). Zminy vidnosyn vlasnosti pid vplyvom hlobalno-lokalnykh vyklykiv: poshuk novykh metodolohichnykh pidkhodiv. Innovatsiyni idei v ekonomichniy nautsi: poshuky vyrishennia suchasnykh problem: Materialy naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsiyi. Kyiv, 4–8. Available at: http://ekmair.ukma.edu.ua/handle/123456789/24515
  40. Vsemirnyy bank. Gosudarstvo v menyayuschemsya mire. Otchet o mirovom razvitii (1997). Moscow: Praym TASS.
  41. Artomova, T. (2016). Relations of social reproduction in Ukraine in the context of transformation of the models of state management. Economic Theory, 3, 5–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/etet2016.03.005
  42. Artomova, T. I. (2021). Value principles of the equilibrium economic development in the new global challenges. Ukrainian Society, 3 (78), 88–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.15407/socium2021.03.088
  43. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29 (3), 155. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/2295952
  44. Kuznetsova, A. F. (2011). Noosfera. Noosferna (evoliutsiyna) osvita: zavdannia i pryntsypy yikh realizatsiyi. Dukhovnist osobystosti: metodolohiya, teoriya i praktyka, 5, 139–151. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/domtp_2012_5_17
  45. Pechchei, A. (1985). Chelovecheskie kachestva. Moscow: Progress, 313.
  46. Slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv (2000). Kyiv: Nauk. dumka, 680.
  47. Alonso-Villar, O., Del Río, C. (2013). Concentration of Economic Activity: An Analytical Framework. Regional Studies, 47 (5), 756–772. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2011.587796
  48. Beck, U., Beck-Gernshiem, E. (1996). Individualization and “precarious freedoms”: perspectives and controversies of a subject-oriented sociology. Detraditionalization. Oxford: Blackwell, 23–48.
Determining the impact of global-local transformations of property on the formation of nanoeconomics

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

How to Cite

Artomova, T., Ostapenko, T., & Britchenko, I. (2023). Determining the impact of global-local transformations of property on the formation of nanoeconomics . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (122), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.277391

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 13 (122) (2023): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Tetiana Artomova, Tetiana Ostapenko, Igor Britchenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.