Object configuration management process

Authors

  • Сергей Иванович Рудницкий University of Economics and Law “KROK” st. Lagerna, 30-32, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03113, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.39788

Keywords:

configuration, configuration management, configuration unit, baseline, project, process, optimization

Abstract

Most of the studies in the area of configuration management (CM) are aimed at processes that control the consistency of tangible objects in a particular subject area. However, in the project management practice, there are problems that require consistency support of intangible objects, such as management processes, risks, work, team, procurement, etc., as well as the whole project. To solve this problem, it is necessary to have a single consistent, conceptual framework, based on which, it is possible to develop and describe the CM process of any object, regardless of the subject area. An attempt to develop a conceptual framework, based on the aggregation of the CM processes of tangible objects of  various subject areas and the CM process of the project was made in the paper. In particular, it was found that the justification for the existence of a generalized CM process is the need to avoid damage (of any nature) from the inconsistency of the controlled object. This inconsistency may occur only if there is the possibility of uncontrolled changes in the external or internal environment of the object. It was determined that all actions to support the object consistency are aimed at creating conditions for the cause-effect relation between the requirements (of any nature) to the object and the object itself. Also, the goal, objectives and structure of the generalized CM process were identified, and its optimization problem based on performance indicators such as the expected value and the expected damage was formulated. 

Author Biography

Сергей Иванович Рудницкий, University of Economics and Law “KROK” st. Lagerna, 30-32, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03113

Postgraduate student

Department of business administration and project management

References

  1. Morozov, V. V., Rudnitskiy, S. I. (2014). Formalizatsiya protsessa identifikatsii konfiguratsii proekta. Visnik NTU "KhPI", 2, 58–70.
  2. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (pmbok Guide) (2004). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
  3. Practice Standard for Project Configuration Management (2007). Newtown Square, Pa: Project Management Institute.
  4. Morozov, V. V., Rudnitskiy, S. I. (2013). Conceptual model of the configuration management process in projects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies. 1/10(61), Part 3, 187–193. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/6766/6016
  5. MIL-HDBK-61. Military Handbook. Configuration Management Guidance (1997). USA. Department of Defense.
  6. ANSI/EIA 649-B. Configuration Management Standard (2011). TechAmerica.
  7. Iso 10007: 1995: Quality Management – Guidelines for Configuration Management (1995). Geneva, Switzerland: ISO.
  8. Ratushnij, R. T. (2005). Metodi ta modelі upravlіnnja konfіguracієju proektu vdoskonalennja sistemi pozhezhogasіnnja v sіl's'komu admіnіstrativnomu rajonі (na prikladі L'vіvs'koї oblastі). Upravlinnya proektami ta programami. Lviv, 19.
  9. Mihaljuk, M. A. (2008). Obgruntuvannja metodіv і modelej іdentifіkacії ta kontrolju konfіguracії proektіv sistem centralіzovanoї zagotіvlі moloka. Upravlinnya proektami ta programami. Lviv, 20.
  10. Sidorchuk, L. L. (2008). Identifikatsiya konfiguratsiyi parku kombayniv u proektah sistem tsentralizovanogo zbirannya rannih zernovih kultur. Upravlinnya proektami ta programami. Lviv, 18.
  11. Naljutin, N. U. (2008). Metody i programmnye sredstva upravlenija konfiguracijami proektov razrabotki vstroennyh sistem. Matematicheskoe i programmnoe obespechenie vychislitel'nyh mashin, kompleksov i komp'juternyh setej. Moscow, 226.
  12. Morozov, V. V., Cherednichenko, A. M., Shpilova, T. I. (2009). Formuvannya, upravlinnya ta rozvitok komandi proektu (povedinkovoyi kompetentsiyi). Univ. ekon. ta prava "KROK". Kiev: Takson, 312.
  13. Bushuev, S. D. (2010). Kreativnyie tehnologii upravleniya proektami i programmami. Kiev: Sammit-Kniga, 768.
  14. Morozov, V. V., Rudnitskiy, S. I. (2012). Vlijanie processov upravlenija konfiguraciej v proektah na strukturu ih terminologicheskoj sistemy. Upravlіnnja proektami ta rozvitok virobnictva, 3(43), 28–38.
  15. IEEE Std 828-1998: IEEE Standard for Software Configuration Management Plans (1998). IEEE.
  16. Lipaev, V. V. (2006). Soprovozhdenie i upravlenie konfiguraciej slozhnyh programmnyh sredstv. Moscow.: SINTEG, 372.
  17. Morozov, V. V., Rudnitskiy, S. I. (2012). Doslіdzhennja skladovih upravlіnnja konfіguracієju proektіv – kljuchovogo faktora uspіshnostі vikonannja proektіv. Rozdіl 3 u kolektivnіj monografії «Upravlіnnja proektami, programami to proektno-orіentovannim bіznesom» Kiev: Univ. ekon. ta prava "KROK", 36–58.
  18. Fowler, M. (1999). UML Distilled: A Brief Guide to the Standard Object Modeling Language. 3rd ed. Addison-Wesley.
  19. Whitman, L., Huff, В. et al. (1997). Structured Models and Dynamic Systems Analysis: The Integration of the IDEF0/IDEF3 Modeling Methods and Discrete Event Simulation. Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation – WSC '97, 518–524. doi: 10.1145/268437.268559
  20. Peregudov, F. I., Tarasenko, F. P. (1989). Vvedenie v sistemnyj analiz. Moscow: Vyssh. shkola, 367.

Published

2015-04-20

How to Cite

Рудницкий, С. И. (2015). Object configuration management process. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(3(74), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.39788

Issue

Section

Control processes