Substatiation of truck selection in terms of minimizing psychophysiological stress on a driver

Authors

  • Олег Валентинович Дерюгін State Higher Educational Institution «National Mining University» 19, Karl Marks ave., Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49005, Ukraine
  • Сергій Іванович Чеберячко State Higher Educational Institution «National Mining University» 19, Karl Marks avenue, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49005, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.42127

Keywords:

truck, technical-operational characteristics, physiological stress, ergonomic characteristics, profile method

Abstract

The method of selecting efficient truck for solving the pressing problems of cargo transportation and the required number of goods in corresponding road conditions and when updating the rolling stock was proposed. It is based on selecting the most important indicators of trucks, with their hierarchical classification and determining the integral quality criterion of trucks using the profile method and the analytic hierarchy process («AHP»). This allows more efficient use of the truck for transporting cargo in the required amount in the specified location without losses and with minimal material and labor costs in compliance with current legislation. Technical-operational, ergonomic, dynamic, environmental and power characteristics of vehicles have been analyzed, based on which it was revealed that the truck MERCEDES-BENZACTROS with ecological EURO 4 level (integral quality index considering weight coefficients – 0.95) engine occupies the leading position. The theoretical research allowed to substantiate the method of selecting vehicles taking into account ergonomic characteristics. An adequate method for solving such multicriteria problems, which lies in combining the set of indicators into the integral quality factor, which characterizes the vehicle quality was determined. The method for making management decisions on updating the rolling stock of the car enterprise allows to reduce the impact of transport-technological process indicators on the psychophysiological state of drivers. 

Author Biographies

Олег Валентинович Дерюгін, State Higher Educational Institution «National Mining University» 19, Karl Marks ave., Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49005

PhD, Associate Professor

The Department of Transport Control

Сергій Іванович Чеберячко, State Higher Educational Institution «National Mining University» 19, Karl Marks avenue, Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49005

Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

The Department of Aerology and Labour Protection 

References

  1. Han, S., Hong, S. (2003). A systematic approach for coupling user satisfaction with product design. Ergonomics, 46 (13-14), 1441–1461. doi: 10.1080/00140130310001610928
  2. Fatkhutdinov, R. А. (2000). Konkurentnosposobnost: ekonomika, strategiya, upravleniye. Мoscow: INFRA-М, 312.
  3. Bayley, M., Curtis, B., Lupton, K., Wright, C. (2004). Vehicle aesthetics and their impact on the pedestrian environment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 9 (6), 437–450. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2004.08.002
  4. Grujicic, M., Pandurangan, B., Xie, X., Gramopadhye, A. K., Wagner, D., Ozen, M. (2010). Musculoskeletal computational analysis of the influence of car-seat design/adjustments on long-distance driving fatigue. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 40 (3), 345–355. doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2010.01.002
  5. Funakoshi, M., Taoda, K., Tsujimura, H., Nishiyama, K. (2004). Measurement of wholebody vibration in taxi divers. Applied Ergonomics, 46 (2), 119–124.
  6. Kolich, M., Taboun, S. (2004). Ergonomics modelling and evaluation of automobile seat comfort. Ergonomics, 47 (8), 841–863. doi: 10.1080/0014013042000193273
  7. Arens, E., Xu, T., Miura, K., Hui, Z., Fountain, M., Bauman, F. (1998). A study of occupant cooling by personally controlled air movement. Energy and Buildings, 27 (1), 45–59. doi: 10.1016/s0378-7788(97)00025-x
  8. Goryev, А. E. (2008). Gruzovye avtomobilnye perevozki. 5th edition. Мoscow: Izdatelskiy tsentr «Akademiya», 288.
  9. Faskhiev, Kh. A., Krakhmalyova, А. V. (2004). Otsenka urovnya konkurentosposobnosti gruzovykh avtomobiley I ikh dvigateley. Marketing v Rossii I za rubezhom, 5, 3–16.
  10. Faskhiev, Kh. A., Kostin, I. М. (2002). Tekhniko-ekonomicheskaya otsenka gruzovykh avtomobiley pri razrabotke. Naberezhnyye Chelny: Izd-vo KamPI, 480.
  11. Faskhiev, Kh. A. (2001). Analiz metodov otsenki kachestva i konkurentosposobnosti gruzovykh avtomobiley. Metody menedzhmenta kachestva, 3, 24–28; 4, 21–26.
  12. Saati, T., Kerns, К. (1991). Analiticheskoe planirovanie. Organizatsiya sistem. Мoscow: Radio i svyuaz, 224.

Published

2015-06-29

How to Cite

Дерюгін, О. В., & Чеберячко, С. І. (2015). Substatiation of truck selection in terms of minimizing psychophysiological stress on a driver. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3(75), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.42127

Issue

Section

Control processes