Solving a task of the project management methodology selection based on the project scope optimization

Authors

  • Игорь Владимирович Кононенко National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" str. Frunze 21, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-2791
  • Анна Владимировна Харазий National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" str. Frunze 21, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002, Ukraine https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7631-5805

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.47406

Keywords:

project management, methodology selection, scope optimization, Scrum, SrystalSlear, resistance

Abstract

The paper deals with the task of the project management methodology selection. Using a particular management methodology may influence the basic project characteristics, namely, implementation time and cost, quality of the project products or stages, risks associated with the project implementation, towards both decrease and increase of these characteristics. For the project management methodology selection, the method based on the project scope optimization was applied, for the management of which the considered methodologies are used. The problem of multi-criteria project scope optimization to create a computer program «ForPlan» using two alternative management methodologies is solved. The calculation is performed using «ScopePro» software, designed for solving the task. The optimization results, which allow to determine the way the application of the Scrum or SrystalSlear methodologies affects the above characteristics for the same project were given. Further, an analysis of the resistance of the results to changes in the original data based on the Monte Carlo method is carried out.

Author Biographies

Игорь Владимирович Кононенко, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" str. Frunze 21, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Strategic Management 

Анна Владимировна Харазий, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute" str. Frunze 21, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Postgraduate

Department of Strategic Management 

References

  1. Okwumabua, G. (2013, April 17). Selecting the Right Project Management Methodology. Mythics Blog. Available: http://www.mythics.com/about/blog/selecting-the-right-project-management-methodology
  2. Hanif, T., Limbachiya, M. (2010). Selecting the right project management approach using 6P. 24th World Conference IPMA (International Project Management Association). Istanbul, Turkey, 183–189.
  3. Whitaker, S. (2014, February 27). How to Build Your Own Project Management Methodology. Copyright Sean Whitaker. Available: http://seanwhitaker.com/how-to-build-your-own-project-management-methodology/
  4. PM GUIDE 01 Selecting a project management methodology. (2014). Enterprise Solutions. Victorian Government Cio Council. Available: http://www.enterprisesolutions.vic.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/PM-GUIDE-01-Project-management-methodology-selection-guideline.pdf
  5. Kononenko, I. V., Fadeyev, V. A., Kolisnyk, M. E. (2012). Project scope optimization model and method on criteria profit, time, cost, quality, risk. 26th IPMA World Congress Proceedings. Conference Centre Creta Maris, Hersonissos, Crete, Greece, 286–292.
  6. Kononenko, I. V., Lobach, E. V., Kharazii, A. V. (2013). Multi-criteria optimization of the project scope at the specified priority for criteria. Open information and computer integrated technologies, Vol. 59, 6–13.
  7. Kononenko, I. V., Kharazii, A. V. (2014). The methods of selection of the project management methodology. International Journal of Computing, Vol. 13, № 4, 240–247.
  8. Kononenko, I. V., Kharazii, A. V. (2015). Development of software for multi-criteria optimization project scope by the method of concessions. Proceedings of the National Technical University "KhPI". Series: Strategic management, portfolio management, programs and projects, № 1 (1110), 11–24.
  9. Xu, J., Zheng, H., Zeng, Z., Wu, S., Shen, M. (2012, November). Discrete time–cost–environment trade-off problem for large-scale construction systems with multiple modes under fuzzy uncertainty and its application to Jinping-II Hydroelectric Project. International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, № 8, 950–966. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2012.01.019
  10. Emelichev, V. A., Kuzmin, K. G. (2004). About the stability radius of an efficient solution of a vector Boolean programming problem with private criteria, which are projections of linear functions on R+. Russian Conference "Discrete Analysis and Operations Research". Novosibirsk: Publishing House of the Institute of Mathematics, 140.
  11. Emelichev, V. A., Kuzmin, K. G. (2005). About the stability radius of an efficient solution of a vector problem of Boolean programming in the metric l1. Reports of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vol. 401, № 6, 733–735.
  12. Leontyev, V. K. (1975). Stability traveling salesman problem. Journal of Numerical Mathematics and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 15, № 5, 1298–1309.
  13. Sotskov, Y. N., Leontev, V. K., Gordeev, E. N. (1995, March). Some concepts of stability analysis in combinatorial optimization. Discrete Applied Mathematics, Vol. 58, № 2, 169–190. doi:10.1016/0166-218x(93)e0126-j
  14. Bukhtoyarov, S. E., Emelichev, V. A. (2003). Parametrization of the optimality principle ("from Pareto to Slater") and the stability of multicriterial trajectory problems. Discrete Analysis and Operations Research. Ser. 2, Vol. 10, № 2, 3–18.
  15. Bukhtoyarov, S. E., Emelichev, V. A. (2004). Quasistability vector of the trajectory problem with a parametric optimality principle. Proceedings of the universities. Mathematics, № 1, 25–30.
  16. Emelichev, V. A., Krichko, V. N. (1999). On the stability of the Pareto optimum of a vector Boolean programming. Discrete Mathematics, Vol. 11, № 4, 27–32.
  17. Emelichev, V. A., Stepanishina, Yu. V. (2002). Quasistability Vector Trajectory Majority Optimization Problem. Mathematical Notes, Vol. 72, № 1, 34–42.
  18. Emelichev, V. A., Girlich, E., Nikulin, Y. V., Podkopaev, D. P. (2002, June). Stability and Regularization of Vector Problems of Integer Linear Programming. Optimization, Vol. 51, № 4, 645–676. doi:10.1080/0233193021000030760
  19. Zubanov, N. V. (2001). Analysis of stability with respect to this goal as one of the approaches to the description of the functioning of the organization in the face of uncertainty. Publishing house of the Samara State Technical University. Available: www.aup.ru/books/m66/4.htm
  20. Greenberg, H. J. (1998). An Annotated Bibliography for Post-Solution Analysis in Mixed Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization. Advances in Computational and Stochastic Optimization, Logic Programming, and Heuristic Search Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces Series, Vol. 9. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 97–147. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2807-1_4

Downloads

Published

2015-08-22

How to Cite

Кононенко, И. В., & Харазий, А. В. (2015). Solving a task of the project management methodology selection based on the project scope optimization. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3(76), 43–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2015.47406

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3(76) (2015): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2015 Анна Владимировна Харазий, Игорь Владимирович Кононенко

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.