Assessment of capabilities of military groupings (forces) based on the functional group “Engage”

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142175

Keywords:

capability­based defense planning, capabilities carriers, functional groups of capabilities, grouping of troops (forces)

Abstract

An approach to assessing the capabilities of groupings of troops (forces) based on the use of the combinatorial method with the limited base of arguments on the example of the functional group of capabilities “Engage” was proposed.

Assessment of capabilities of groupings of troops (forces) is carried out within the framework of defense planning, with the aim of determining the prospective structure of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (defense forces). The current Order of evaluation of capabilities of groupings of troops (forces) in the Armed Forces of Ukraine is based on the expert methods of evaluation. The shortcomings of the particular Order are: subjectivity, long duration and personnel involvement (periodic distraction of specialists from performing their functional duties). Therefore, the development of new approaches to assessment of the capabilities of groupings of troops (forces) based of modern scientific analytical methods is a relevant scientific challenge.

According to the NATO standards, capabilities are divided into nine functional groups that contain 464 capabilities. To develop the method for capabilities assessment with the use of the analytical methods taking into consideration the existing regulatory framework, the analysis of the existing Order of evaluation of capabilities of groupings of troops (forces) in the Armed Forces of Ukraine was carried out. The analysis revealed that the functional groups are of different levels. It is appropriate to group them into three classes: the class of technical equipment, the class of personnel training and the class of institutional capabilities. In this case, it was determined that the capabilities carriers depending on the level of functioning are different in nature. That is why it is necessary to evaluate them by different components. It is proposed to distinguish between elementary (armament and military equipment) and group capabilities (subdivisions, military units, formations, and groupings).

The research revealed the analytical dependence of the impact of elementary carriers of capabilities on the effectiveness of task execution by group carriers of capabilities. The specified approach will be implemented in the automated decision support system during capability­based defense planning.

The application of this approach will make it possible to reduce the impact of the subjective factor and reduce the time to make a reasonable decision on the required structure of a grouping of troops (forces) to execute the set tasks, to estimate a sufficient number of options for its application. In addition, the implementation of the proposed approach will offer an opportunity to identify: the quantitative and qualitative demand of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (defense forces) in provision with the samples of armament and military equipment, the necessary amount of resources for the development of the Armed Forces (defense forces). The proposed analytical method will make it possible without involving experts to assess the role of each military formation from the defense forces, determine the priority plan for the development of the capabilities of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (defense forces).

Author Biographies

Vasyl Bychenkov, Ivan Chernyakhovsky National Defense University of Ukraine Povitroflotskyi ave., 28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03049

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher

Center of Military and Strategic Studies

Andrii Koretskyi, Ivan Chernyakhovsky National Defense University of Ukraine Povitroflotskyi ave., 28, Kyiv, Ukraine, 03049

PhD, Senior Researcher

Center of Military and Strategic Studies

Oleksandr Оksiiuk, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Volodymyrska str., 60, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01033

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Cyber Security and Information Protection 

Vira Vialkova, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv Volodymyrska str., 60, Kyiv, Ukraine, 01033

PhD

Department of Cyber Security and Information Protection 

References

  1. Richna natsionalna prohrama pid ehidoiu Komisiyi Ukraina – NATO na 2018 rik. Ukaz Prezydenta Ukrainy vid 28.03.2017 r. No. 89/2018. Available at: https://www.president.gov.ua/storage/j-files-storage/00/58/62/bd6cdbcf9328901d1d1d8163ae5348c6_1522256231.pdf
  2. Tahariev, T. (2010). Oboronne planuvannia – kliuchovi protsesy oboronnoho menedzhmentu. Oboronnyi menedzhment: oznaiomlennia. Zheneva-Kyiv: Zhenevskyi tsentr demokratychnoho kontroliu nad zbroinymy sylamy, 41–68.
  3. Frorat, H. (2010). Menedzhment finansiv. Oboronnyi menedzhment: oznaiomlennia. Zheneva-Kyiv: Zhenevskyi tsentr demokratychnoho kontroliu nad zbroinymy sylamy, 87–118.
  4. Treddenik, D. (2010). Menedzhment liudskykh resursiv. Oboronnyi menedzhment: oznaiomlennia. Zheneva-Kyiv: Zhenevskyi tsentr demokratychnoho kontroliu nad zbroinymy sylamy, 119–152.
  5. Lourens, E. (2010). Menedzhment u sferi zakupivel. Oboronnyi menedzhment: oznaiomlennia. Zheneva-Kyiv: Zhenevskyi tsentr demokratychnoho kontroliu nad zbroinymy sylamy, 153–190.
  6. Guide to Capability-Based Planning (2010). TTCP Technical Report: TR-JSA-TP3-2.
  7. Keehan Mark, P. (2006). Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution (PPBE) Process. Teacting note: Defense Acqouisition University. Business, Cost Estimating, and Financial Management Department.
  8. Church, A. T., Warner, T. (2009). DoD planning, budgeting, and execution system: a path toward improvement. Joint Force Quarterly, 53, 80–84.
  9. GAO Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Developing and Managing Capital Program Costs. GAO-09-3SP. United States Government Accountability Office, 2009. Available at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/80/77175.pdf
  10. Defence Capability Development Manual (2006). Canberra: Defence Publishing Service, Department of Defence.
  11. Capability Based Planning for the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Forces (2002). Department of National Defence, 24–27.
  12. Bychenkov, V. V., Butenko, M. P. (2017). Avtomatyzatsiya protsesu rozpodilu finansovykh oboronnykh resursiv pid chas oboronnoho planuvannia na osnovi spromozhnostei. Nauka i oborona, 3/4, 26–32.
  13. Rekomendatsiyi z oboronnoho planuvannia na osnovi spromozhnostei v Ministerstvi oborony Ukrainy ta Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Zatverdzheno Ministrom oborony Ukrainy vid 12.06.2017 r (2017). Kyiv: MOU, 49.
  14. Yedynyi perelik (kataloh) spromozhnostei Ministerstva oborony Ukrainy ta Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Zatverdzheno Ministrom oborony Ukrainy vid 28.11.2017 r. (2017). Kyiv: MOU, 356.
  15. Rekomendatsiyi z poriadku orhanizatsiyi provedennia otsiniuvannia spromozhnostei u Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Zatverdzheno Ministrom oborony Ukrainy vid 07.12.2017 r. (2017). Kyiv: MOU, 29.
  16. Romanchenko, I. S., Bohdanovych, V. Yu., Dieniezhkin, M. M. (2015). Teoretyko-metodolohichni zasady pobudovy systemy upravlinnia efektyvnistiu planuvannia ta vykonannia prohram rozvytku Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy. Nauka i oborona, 3/4, 50–55.
  17. Semenenko, O. M., Vodchyts, O. H., Boiko, R. V., Kostrach, V. V., Berdochnyk, A. D. (2016). Osnovni aspekty voienno-ekonomichnoi bezpeky Ukrainy ta mozhlyvi shliakhy yii zabezpechennia na serednostrokovu perspektyvu (2016–2020 rr.). Systemy ozbroiennia i viyskova tekhnika, 3 (47), 123–129.
  18. Semenenko, O. M., Vodchyts, O. H., Boiko, R. V., Didichenko, V. P., Kremeshnyi, O. I., Korochkin, O. A. (2016). Metod formuvannia obgruntovanykh perelikiv zakhodiv ta zavdan v prohramakh i planakh rozvytku Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl, 3 (48), 44–50.
  19. Semenenko, O. M., Boiko, R. V., Vodchyts, O. H., Vasylenko, S. P., Zubrytska, H. H., Kremeshnyi, O. I. (2017). Metodyka rozpodilu oboronnoho biudzhetu Ukrainy mizh skladovymy syl oborony z urakhuvanniam pokaznykiv potreb ta priorytetnosti zavdan tsykh skladovykh na planovyi rik. Nauka i tekhnika Povitrianykh Syl Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy, 4 (29), 123–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2017.29.17
  20. Semenenko, O. M., Boiko, R. V., Dobrovolskyi, Yu. B., Ivanov, V. L., Chyhryn, R. M., Berdochnyk, A. D. (2017). Hrafoanalitychnyi metod obgruntuvannia ratsionalnoi chyselnosti ZSU z vrakhuvanniam vplyvu obmezhuiuchykh faktoriv ta pokaznykiv obsiahiv mobilizatsiynoho naroshchuvannia. Systemy ozbroiennia i viyskova tekhnika, 2 (50), 176–183.
  21. Maslovskyi, S. S., Semenenko, O. M., Vodchyts, O. H., Boiko, R. V., Korochkin, O. A., Naumenko, M. V., Kirvas, V. V. (2017). Suchasni osoblyvosti vprovadzhennia metodu “Planuvannia na osnovi spromozhnostei” u systemu oboronnoho planuvannia v Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl, 5 (54), 187–196.
  22. Romanchenko, I. S., Bohdanovych, V. Yu., Dieniezhkin, M. M., Krykun, P. M. (2017). Stan i perspektyvy rozvytku systemy oboronnoho planuvannia v Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy. Nauka i oborona, 1, 25–30.
  23. Rusnak, I. S., Petrenko, A. H., Yakovenko, A. V., Romaniuk, I. M. (2017). Oboronne planuvannia na osnovi spromozhnostei: osoblyvosti ta perspektyvy vprovadzhennia. Nauka i oborona, 2, 3–9.
  24. Stepaniuk, M. Yu., Yurchyna, Yu. V. (2018). Oboronne planuvannia yak spromozhnist. Oboronnyi visnyk, 2, 8–15.
  25. Tymchasova instruktsiya pro poriadok orhanizatsiyi i provedennia perevirok otsiniuvannia nabuttia operatyvnykh (boiovykh) spromozhnostei u Zbroinykh Sylakh Ukrainy: Zatverdzhena Ministrom oborony Ukrainy vid 29.05.2013. Nakaz No. 352 (2013). Kyiv: MOU, 25.
  26. Bychenkov, V. V. (2012). Rozroblennia alhorytmu syntezu polinomu n-ho stupenia zalezhnosti tsilovoi funktsiyi vid vyznachenoi kilkosti arhumentiv. Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi u sferi bezpeky ta oborony, 2, 9–13.
  27. Bychenkov, V. V., Zaika, L. A., Sudnikov, Ye. O. (2013). Tekhnolohiya rozroblennia znanniaorientovanykh system pidtrymky rishen v umovakh ryzykiv ta nevyznachenostei (etap “obroblennia pochatkovykh danykh”). Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi u sferi bezpeky ta oborony, 3, 8–12.
  28. Bychenkov, V. V., Zaika, V. F. (2014). Rozroblennia systemy kryteriyiv selektsiyi formulnykh vyraziv dlia alhorytmu pobudovy modeli skladnoi systemy z vykorystanniam kombinatornoho metodu z obmezhenoiu bazoiu arhumentiv. Systemy upravlinnia, navihatsiyi ta zviazku, 3, 52–57.
  29. Bychenkov, V. V., Sbitniev, A. I., Ushakov, I. V. (2015). Otsiniuvannia efektyvnosti funktsionuvannia rehresiynoi modeli, rozroblenoi na osnovi alhorytmu pobudovy modeli skladnoi systemy z vykorystanniam kombinatornoho metodu z obmezhenoiu bazoiu arhumentiv pry pobudovi rivnian pershoho stupenia. Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi u sferi bezpeky ta oborony, 1, 5–13.
  30. Bychenkov, V. V. (2015). Syntez systemy pidtrymky pryiniattia rishen vyznachennia rivnia spromozhnostei Zbroinykh Syl Ukrainy v khodi oboronnoho planuvannia. Suchasni informatsiyni tekhnolohiyi u sferi bezpeky ta oborony, 3, 9–17.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-13

How to Cite

Bychenkov, V., Koretskyi, A., Оksiiuk O., & Vialkova, V. (2018). Assessment of capabilities of military groupings (forces) based on the functional group “Engage”. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (95), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.142175

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 3 (95) (2018): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2018 Vasyl Bychenkov, Andrii Koretskyi, Oleksandr Оksiiuk, Vira Vialkova

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 5
  • Captures
    • Readers: 8
see details