Substantiation of the technology for fermented sour-milk desserts with bifidogenic properties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.155278Keywords:
prebiotics, probiotics, bifidobacteria, lactobacilli, fruit-berry dressing, thickeners, fermented sour-milk dessertsAbstract
The paper reports the newly developed technology of sour-milk desserts that uses the consortia of lactobacilli ‒ Acidophilus, S. Thermophilus, and bifidobacteria ‒ B. Bifidum, B. Longum, B. Adolescentis, resistant to the effects of inhibitors ‒ gastric juice, bile, phenol, sodium chloride, antibiotics, and lactic acid.
To better develop the bifidobacteria, bio-stimulants were applied. The number of viable cells of bifidobacteria during 6 hours of fermentation in the presence of fructose increases from 1·104 CFU/cm3 up to 8.8·109 CFU/cm3, of lactulose ‒ to 9.9·108 CFU/cm3.
To obtain a structure resistant to delamination, with a glossy surface, the modified starch was used. The dynamic viscosity of experimental samples is 25·10-3 PA·s, the number of viable cells of bifidobacteria is 2,5·1010 CFU/cm3.
Pasteurization at a temperature of (90±2) °C at a 2-minute aging warrants the safety of a milk mixture.
The formulation and technology for dessert fermented products with a fruit-berry dressing have been developed. The obtained product clots are dense, their consistency is homogeneous, gentle, gel-like, moderately thick. The taste is pure, pleasant, with a color, flavor, and smell of the fruit-berry filler.
After 10 days of storage, the number of viable cells of bifidobacteria is 1.5∙1010 CFU/cm3, after 15 days –9.5∙109 CFU/cm3, which significantly exceeds the standard required level of bifidobacteria in fermented milk products. The optimal shelf life of dessert products at a temperature of (3±1) °C without a change in the rheological properties is 15 days.
The use of lactic acid bacteria with bifidogenic properties extends the range of products capable to normalize the imbalance of intestinal microflora in humans and to stimulate own intestinal microflora.
References
- Roberfroid, M. B. (2002). Global view on functional foods: European perspectives. British Journal of Nutrition, 88 (S2), S133–S138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2002677
- Roberfroid, M. B. (2000). Prebiotics and probiotics: are they functional foods? The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 71 (6), 1682S–1687S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/71.6.1682s
- Rolfe, R. D. (2000). The Role of Probiotic Cultures in the Control of Gastrointestinal Health. The Journal of Nutrition, 130 (2), 369S–402S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.2.396s
- Shah, N. P. (2000). Probiotic Bacteria: Selective Enumeration and Survival in Dairy Foods. Journal of Dairy Science, 83 (4), 894–907. doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74953-8
- Sanders, M. E. (2000). Considerations for Use of Probiotic Bacteria to Modulate Human Health. The Journal of Nutrition, 130 (2), 384S–390S. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/130.2.384s
- Botina, S. G. (2008). Shtammy Streptococcus thermophilus, fermentuyushchie galaktozu. Molochnaya promyshlennost', 4, 54–56.
- Richardson, D. P. (2002). Functional Food and Health Claims. The world of Functional ingredients, 9, 12–20.
- Schrezenmeir, J., de Vrese, M. (2001). Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics – approaching a definition. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 73 (2), 361s–364s. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/73.2.361s
- Smirnov, V. V., Kovalenko, N. K., Podgoriy, V. S., Sorokulova, I. B. (2002). Probiotiki na osnove zhivyh kul'tur. Mikrob. zhurn., 64 (4), 62–80.
- Kailasapathy, K., Chin, J. (2000). Survival and therapeutic potential of probiotic organisms with reference to Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium spp. Immunology and Cell Biology, 78 (1), 80–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1711.2000.00886.x
- Tanashchuk, S. V., Savchenko, O. A., Podosinnikov, A. R. (2005). Osnovnye harakteristiki laktulozy, kak funkcional'nogo ingredienta. Molochnoe Delo, 9, 38–39.
- Yaroshchuk, O. A., Ovcharova, G. P., Donchenko, L. V. (2007). Fruktovye deserty s pektinom na osnove molochnoy syvorotki. Pererabotka moloka, 12, 14–15.
- Semenihina, V. F., Rozhkova, I. V., Begunova, A. V. (2009). Tekhnologicheskie aspekty ispol'zovaniya bifidobakteriy pri proizvodstve kislomolochnyh produktov. Molochnaya promyshlennost', 12, 9–11.
- Hramcov, A. G., Sadovoy, V. V., Samylina, V. A. et. al. (2005). Kompleksnaya sistema prebioticheski-sorbcionnoy napravlennosti. Izvestiya vysshih uchebnyh zavedeniy. Pishchevaya tekhnologiya, 4, 40–42.
- Didukh, N. A., Mohylianska, N. O., Vlasenko, O. V. (2009). Symbiotychnyi kompleks dlia vyrobnytstva atsydofilnykh kyslomolochnykh produktiv z pidvyshchenymy funktsionalnymy vlastyvostiamy. Naukovi pratsi Odesskoi natsionalnoi akademiyi kharchovykh tekhnolohiy, 2 (36), 129–133.
- Nasledova, L. F. (2009). Eshche raz o laktuloze. Molochnaya promyshlennost', 9, 68–69.
- Hramcov, A. G., Evdokimov, I. A., Ryabceva, S. A., Kozhevnikova, O. N. (2009). Tekhnologicheskaya platforma otechestvennogo prebiotika laktulozy. Molochnaya promyshlennost', 12, 53–56.
- Polyanskiy, K. K., Glagoleva, V. E., Ryahovskiy, Yu. V. (2001). Pishchevye volokna v molochnih produktah. Molochnaya promyshlennost', 6, 41.
- Stankevych, H. M., Didukh, H. V. (2009). Optymizatsiya parametriv homohenizatsiyi molochno-zhyrovykh sumishei dlia herodietychnykh napoiv. Kharchova nauka i tekhnolohiya, 2, 69–71.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Alla Solomon, Mariana Bondar, Angela Dyakonova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.