Evaluation of quality level in managing the development of industrial enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.177919

Keywords:

estimation of development management level, system of indicator estimates, components of development, integrated indicator, estimation scale

Abstract

The research focuses on the substantiation of theoretical aspects and practical support for assessing the quality level of managing enterprises development taking into account the influence of the external and internal environment.

The conceptual apparatus for estimation of quality development of enterprise management was refined, which makes it possible to determine reasonably the level of management according to the generally known elements (economic, social and ecological) that are proposed to be supplemented with an energy component. A new conceptual approach to the procedure of evaluation of the quality of development management by levels, the stages of which are proposed to expand by: the formation of the database by levels of management (state, regional), choice and evaluation of indicators by components of development and spheres of activity, development of the tools for management improvement. The integrated indicator has been proposed, which differs from the existing ones by the fact that it estimates the quality of development management, rather than the development level. In contrast to the previously proposed ones, the integrated indicator takes into account the influence of external environment by the components of development and of the internal environment – by the areas of activity for each component. That is why it has practical significance, since it allows performing monitoring and detecting the negative influence of management on the enterprise development. Taking coke plants as an example, the structures of the indicators that characterize the management quality were determined. A large number of indicators were reduced by the method of expert assessments, which increases the validity of the choice. Indicator estimates were constructed solely based on relative indicators (indices), which improves consistency. Using the integrated method, the estimation of the indicators by individual components and on the whole was performed. The scale for evaluation of the quality level of enterprise development management was constructed using the Harrington function. The new approach to assessing the quality of the enterprise development management and a complex of mathematical support will lead to the uniform economic, social, environmental and energy development of enterprises

Author Biographies

Diana Raiko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute» Kyrpychova str., 2, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

Olha Podrez, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute» Kyrpychova str., 2, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Postgraduate student

Department of Management of Innovative Entrepreneurship and International Economic Relations

Viktoriia Cherepanova, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute» Kyrpychova str., 2, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management of Innovative Entrepreneurship and International Economic Relations

Irina Fedorenko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute» Kyrpychova str., 2, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of International Business And Finance

Yuliia Shypulina, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute» Kyrpychova str., 2, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

References

  1. Posłuszny, K. (2017). Methods of the industrial enterprises sustainable business assessment. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, 491, 332–339. doi: https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2017.491.31
  2. López, M. V., Garcia, A., Rodriguez, L. (2007). Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75 (3), 285–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9253-8
  3. Islam, R., Bashawir Abdul Ghani, A., Zainal Abidin, I., Malar Rayaiappan, J. (2017). Impact on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia’s economic growth. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15 (1), 55–62. doi: https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(1).2017.05
  4. Grachev, V. A., Plyamina, O. V., Lobkovsky, V. A. (2016). Indicator Evaluation of Environmental Efficiency Measures to Ensure Environmental Safety. Voprosy sovremennoj nauki i praktiki. Universitet imeni V.I. Vernadskogo, 3, 21–30: doi: https://doi.org/10.17277/voprosy.2016.03.pp.021-030
  5. Valentiny, T., Gonos, J., Timková, V., Košíková, M. (2017). Impact of selected factors on the formation of regional disparities in Slovakia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 12 (6 (52)), 1626–1639. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322094853
  6. Klarin, T. (2018). The Concept of Sustainable Development: From its Beginning to the Contemporary Issues. Zagreb International Review of Economics and Business, 21 (1), 67–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/zireb-2018-0005
  7. Filipishyna, L., Bessonova, S., Venckeviciute, G. (2018). Integral assessment of developmental stability: cases of Lithuania and Ukraine. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6 (1), 87–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2018.6.1(7)
  8. Posilkina, O. V., Bratishko, Yu. S., Svetlichnaya, K. S. (2015). Diagnostics of sustainable social and economic development of pharmaceutical enterprises. Upravlinnia, ekonomika ta zabezpechennia yakosti v farmatsiyi, 3, 44–50.
  9. Raiko, D. V., Podrez, O. I. (2018). The Formation of Instruments of Management of Industrial Enterprises According to the Theoretical and Functional Approaches. Business Inform, 3, 386–393.
  10. Kenesheva, G., Alimbayev, A. (2018). Technological modernization of industry. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13 (8), 2416–2426.
  11. Savkiv, U. S. (2012). Integral Estimates of Sustainable Development of the Region. Business Inform, 1, 45–50.
  12. Mukasheva, G., Zhakisheva, K., Yernazarova, A., Tazhikenova, S., Zhumanova, D., Kurmanova, G. (2018). Economic problems of the development of agro-industrial complex: Mechanism of solution. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 13 (7), Р. 2017–2030.
  13. Sokil, O., Zhuk, V., Vasa, L. (2018). Integral assessment of the sustainable development of agriculture in Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХI, 170 (3-4), 15–21. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v170-03
  14. Stratehiya staloho rozvytku Ukrainy do 2030 roku: PROEKT-2017 (2017). Kyiv, 110.
  15. Itogi raboty koksohimicheskih predpriyatiy i proizvodstv Ukrainy v 2018 godu (2019). Dnipro, 73.
  16. Kamyshnikova, E. V. (2009). Methods of complex estimation formation for enterprise economic security level. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy, 88–92. Available at: http://www.stattionline.org.ua/index.php/ekonom/34/2326-metody-formirovaniya-kompleksnoj-ocenki-urovnya-ekonomicheskoj-bezopasn

Downloads

Published

2019-09-11

How to Cite

Raiko, D., Podrez, O., Cherepanova, V., Fedorenko, I., & Shypulina, Y. (2019). Evaluation of quality level in managing the development of industrial enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (101), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.177919

Issue

Section

Control processes