Development of a new method for automated selection of robotic mechanic-assembly technologies based on the technical and economic criteria

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.184294

Keywords:

industrial robot, robotic mechanic-assembly technology, technical-economic criterion, depreciation

Abstract

A new method for the automated selection of robotic mechanic-assembly technologies according to technical and economic criteria was proposed. The choice is made on the known set of robotized mechanic assembly technologies, components of the system of technical and economic criteria, analyzed methods for depreciation expense of residual value of industrial robots and other organizational and technological input data. The content of the latter is: the period of operation of industrial robots in flexible production cells, period and volume of production, quantity and volume of product batches for launch in manufacturing.

The process of selecting robotic mechanic-assembly technologies is performed at the minimum value of one of the user-selected technical and economic criteria from their pre-developed system. Each of the criteria with different degree of detailing reproduces the content of the «robotic» component of the cost of production of a product unit and is determined by using only industrial robots.

The performed formalization of the selection process made it possible to develop algorithmic support, which underlies functioning of the developed computer program in the software environment MS Excel. The performance of a computer program was tested on the examples that on the set of the synthesized robotic mechanic-assembly selection technologies differ only by varying data on the organizational and technological features of using industrial robots in mechanic-assembly flexible production cells.

The analysis of the obtained results showed that the selection criterion, determined by the use of the straight-line method of depreciation expense of industrial robots, regardless of the number of their useful years, is the smallest criterion for the examined examples under equal conditions.

The mathematical generalizations were formed and the recommendations on using the methods of depreciation expense of the cost of industrial robot, which determine their residual cost when calculating selection criteria, were given.

The method for the selection of robotic mechanic-assembly technologies is invariant in the context of the possibility of its use in different countries with different regulatory base concerning the existing methods of depreciation expense for determining residual value of industrial robots

Author Biographies

Valerii Kyrylovych, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University Chudnivska str., 103, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10005

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies Named after prof. B. B. Samotokin

Lubomir Dimitrov, Technical Universityof Sofia Kliment Ohridski str., 8, Sofia, Republic of Bulgaria, 1000

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Machine Parts

Petro Melnychuk, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University Chudnivska str., 103, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10005

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Applied Mechanics and Computer-Integrated Technologies

Anatolii Bohdanets, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University Chudnivska str., 103, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10005

Department of Automation and Computer-Integrated Technologies Named after prof. B. B. Samotokin

Andrii Shostachuk, Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University Chudnivska str., 103, Zhytomyr, Ukraine, 10005

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Applied Mechanics and Computer-Integrated Technologies

References

  1. Kyrylovych, V. (2015). Formalizing of the process of automated synthesis of robotic mechanical assembly technologies on knoun technical basis of flexible manufacturing cells. Bulgarian Journal for Engineering Design, 27, 89–95.
  2. Industrial Robot Integration. Available at: https://www.robots.com/robots
  3. International Federation of Robotics. Available at: https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/WR_Presentation_Industry_and_Service_Robots_rev_5_12_18.pdf
  4. Karsak, E. E. (2006). Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 35 (9-10), 867–874. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0765-2
  5. Dhal, P. R., Datta, S., Mahapatra, S. S. (2011). Flexible Manufacturing System selection based on grey relation under uncertainty. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 8 (4), 516. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijsom.2011.039667
  6. Saidi Mehrabad, M., Anvari, M. (2009). Provident decision making by considering dynamic and fuzzy environment for FMS evaluation. International Journal of Production Research, 48 (15), 4555–4584. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540902933130
  7. Karsak, E. E. (2002). Distance-based fuzzy MCDM approach for evaluating flexible manufacturing system alternatives. International Journal of Production Research, 40 (13), 3167–3181. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210146062
  8. Chatterjee, P., Chakraborty, S. (2014). Investigating the Effect of Normalization Norms in Flexible Manufacturing Sytem Se-lection Using Multi - Criteria Decision - Making Methods. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 7 (3), 141–150. doi: https://doi.org/10.25103/jestr.073.23
  9. İç, Y. T. (2012). An experimental design approach using TOPSIS method for the selection of computer-integrated manufacturing technologies. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 28 (2), 245–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2011.09.005
  10. Verl, A., Valente, A., Melkote, S., Brecher, C., Ozturk, E., Tunc, L. T. (2019). Robots in machining. CIRP Annals, 68 (2), 799–822. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2019.05.009
  11. Barnfather, J. D., Goodfellow, M. J., Abram, T. (2016). A performance evaluation methodology for robotic machine tools used in large volume manufacturing. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 37, 49–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2015.06.002
  12. Daim, T. U., Yoon, B.-S., Lindenberg, J., Grizzi, R., Estep, J., Oliver, T. (2018). Strategic roadmapping of robotics technologies for the power industry: A multicriteria technology assessment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 131, 49–66. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.006
  13. Hamzeh, R., Xu, X. (2019). Technology selection methods and applications in manufacturing: A review from 1990 to 2017. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 138, 106123. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106123
  14. Kyrylovych, V. (2015). The system of technical and economic criteria as the base of criterial feasibility of automated syntethsis of mechanicalassemblyrobotic technologies. Enerhetyka i avtomatyka, 3, 5–18.
  15. Popova, V. D., Kyzyma, N. M. (2018). Special aspects of calculating of depreciation and influence of depreciation on reproduction of fixed assets. Molodyi vchenyi, 10 (62), 374–380. Available at: http://molodyvcheny.in.ua/files/journal/2018/10/89.pdf
  16. Sigorskiy, V. P. (1977). Matematicheskiy apparat inzhenera. Kyiv: Tehnika, 768.
  17. Kostenko, N. (2015). Strok korysnoho vykorystannia OZ: vyznachaiemo, zastosovuiemo. Podatky ta bukhhalterskyi oblik, 79. Available at: https://i.factor.ua/ukr/journals/nibu/2015/october/issue-79/article-11939.html?exp=true&utm_expid=.7YZnTvPwQKWPt2vl0yesRw.1&utmreferrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
  18. Bobko, V. V. (2013). Features valuation of fixed assets for national and international standards. Zeszyty Naukowe PWSZ w Płocku Nauki Ekonomiczne, XVII, 159–167.
  19. Osnovy alhorytmizatsiyi obchysliuvalnykh protsesiv, alhorytmy ta formy yikh podannia. Available at: https://studfiles.net/preview/5994725/

Downloads

Published

2019-11-19

How to Cite

Kyrylovych, V., Dimitrov, L., Melnychuk, P., Bohdanets, A., & Shostachuk, A. (2019). Development of a new method for automated selection of robotic mechanic-assembly technologies based on the technical and economic criteria. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(1 (102), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2019.184294

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (102) (2019): Engineering technological systems

Section

Engineering technological systems

License

Copyright (c) 2019 Valerii Kyrylovych, Lubomir Dimitrov, Petro Melnychuk, Anatolii Bohdanets, Andrii Shostachuk

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.