Expert-analytical estimation of environmental safety of solid household waste handling processes




environmental safety, systems analysis, waste han- dling, hierarchy analysis method


One of the key indicators of regional development is environ- mentally safe handling of waste including household waste. Solving the problems in this domain requires the creation of an efficient household waste management system. A mechanism for solving this problem was proposed in this study. In contrast to the existing ones, it comprehensively takes into account the formation of environmen- tal hazards at all stages of the waste handling life cycle and substan- tiates and identifies priorities of obligatory management measures to be taken at local, regional and national levels with their qualitative and quantitative expert estimation.

The study of waste hierarchy performed according to the Di- rective 2008/98/EC by the hierarchy analysis method has made it possible to determine not only the priorities of the measures en- suring environmental safety of SHW handling process but also the significance of measures at each stage. According to the calculations, contributions to the overall risk amounted to 46.15 % for disposal, 24.02 % for recycling, 10.95 % for neutralization, 10.95 % for genera- tion, 5.14 % for collection and 2.79 % for transportation.

Assessment of the factor characteristics has made it possible to find out that the handling conditions whose contribution is 54.95 % of all factors require the greatest attention during danger generation.

Effectiveness of implementation of the measures ensuring nor- mative environmental safety can be ranked as follows: 60.22 % for the local level, 22.55 % for the regional level and 17.23 % for the national level.

The study has found that the formation of awareness, conscien- tiousness, and rational consumption is the most effective measure of ensuring environmental safety making up 27.55 % among the thirteen measures assessed.

Application of the proposed method will ensure making groun- ded managerial decisions not only for the whole system of household waste handling but also for each of its stages: from waste generation to its operation.

This method is quite simple to use and can be applied at the national, regional or local levels.

Author Biographies

Ihor Honcharenko, Ukrainian Research Institute of Environmental Problems Bakulina str., 6, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Laboratory for Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Expertise

Lyudmula Anishchenko, Ukrainian Research Institute of Environmental Problems Bakulina str., 6, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Laboratory for Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Expertise

Leonid Pisnia, Ukrainian Research Institute of Environmental Problems Bakulina str., 6, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166


Laboratory for Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Expertise


  1. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., Van Woerden, F. (2018). What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050. World Bank. doi:
  2. Mishchenko, V. S., Makovetska, Yu. M., Omelianenko, T. L. (2013). Instytutsionalnyi rozvytok sfery povodzhennia z vidkhodamy v Ukraini: na shliakhu yevropeiskoi intehratsiyi. K.: Derzhavna ustanova «Instytut ekonomiky pryrodokorystuvannia ta staloho rozvytku Natsionalnoi akademiyi nauk Ukrainy», 192. Available at:
  3. Song, Q., Li, J., Zeng, X. (2015). Minimizing the increasing solid waste through zero waste strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 199–210. doi:
  4. Rasmeni, Z. Z., Madyira, D. M. (2019). A Review of the Current Municipal Solid Waste Management Practices in Johannesburg City Townships. Procedia Manufacturing, 35, 1025–1031. doi:
  5. Preziosi, E., Frollini, E., Zoppini, A., Ghergo, S., Melita, M., Parrone, D. et. al. (2019). Disentangling natural and anthropogenic impacts on groundwater by hydrogeochemical, isotopic and microbiological data: Hints from a municipal solid waste landfill. Waste Management, 84, 245–255. doi:
  6. Chithra, K., Anilkumar, P. P., Naseer, M. A. (2016). Municipal Solid Waste Management, a Major Impacted Sector of Urban Environment Due to Residential Land Use Activities- Study of Kozhikode City. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 35, 110–118. doi:
  7. Malinauskaite, J., Jouhara, H., Czajczyńska, D., Stanchev, P., Katsou, E., Rostkowski, P. et. al. (2017). Municipal solid waste management and waste-to-energy in the context of a circular economy and energy recycling in Europe. Energy, 141, 2013–2044. doi:
  8. Casazza, M., Huisingh, D., Ulgiati, S., Severino, V., Liu, G., Lega, M. (2019). Product Service System-based Municipal Solid Waste circular management platform in Campania Region (Italy): a preliminary analysis. Procedia CIRP, 83, 224–229. doi:
  9. Krounbi, L., Enders, A., van Es, H., Woolf, D., von Herzen, B., Lehmann, J. (2019). Biological and thermochemical conversion of human solid waste to soil amendments. Waste Management, 89, 366–378. doi:
  10. Gentil, E. C., Damgaard, A., Hauschild, M., Finnveden, G., Eriksson, O., Thorneloe, S. et. al. (2010). Models for waste life cycle assessment: Review of technical assumptions. Waste Management, 30 (12), 2636–2648. doi:
  11. Ghinoi, S., Silvestri, F., Steiner, B. (2020). Toward the creation of novel food waste management systems: A network approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 246, 118987. doi:
  12. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives (Text with EEA relevance) (2008). Official Journal of the European Union. Available at:
  13. Cole, C., Gnanapragasam, A., Cooper, T., Singh, J. (2019). An assessment of achievements of the WEEE Directive in promoting movement up the waste hierarchy: experiences in the UK. Waste Management, 87, 417–427. doi:
  14. Shageev, D. A. (2019). Methods of development of coordinated managerial decisions for selection of efficient projects. Part 1. Vestnik Yuzhno-Ural'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika i menedzhment, 13 (2), 145–164. doi:
  15. Saati, T. L. (2008). Prinyatie resheniy pri zavisimostyah i obratnyh svyazyah: Analiticheskie seti. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo LKI, 360.
  16. Saaty, T. L. (2016). Relative Measurement and Its Generalization in Decision Making. Why Pairwise Comparisons are Central in Mathematics for the Measurement of Intangible Factors. Cloud of science, 3 (2). Available at:
  17. Anishchenko, L. Ya. (2009). Teoreticheskoe obosnovanie kombinirovannogo metoda prinyatiya resheniy v zadachah mnogokriterial'noy kompleksnoy otsenki vozdeystviya i upravleniya ekologicheskoy bezopasnost'yu protyazhennyh gidrotehnicheskih sooruzheniy. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (2 (38)), 21–28. Available at:
  18. Lysenko, O. I., Yakovlev, Ye. O., Chumachenko, S. M., Pisnia, L. A. (2007). Ekspertno-analitychne otsiniuvannia v zadachakh ekolohichnoi bezpeky. Mify ta realnist. Zb. prats Natsionalnoho NDTs OT i VB Ukrainy, «Voienno-ekolohichna dumka», 2, 18–26.




How to Cite

Honcharenko, I., Anishchenko, L., & Pisnia, L. (2020). Expert-analytical estimation of environmental safety of solid household waste handling processes. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(10 (103), 63–76.