Development of an economicmathematical model to determine the optimal duration of project operations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.205114Keywords:
project duration, optimization model, economic-mathematical model, company knowledge management.Abstract
Planning the duration of works in order to optimize the implementation time is an important component of an efficient company’s project management. The optimization economic-mathematical model for determining the duration of implementation of project stages was created in the research. The objective function is the maximization of the probability of successful project implementation and generation of new organizational knowledge at each stage. The model assumes that the sum of the duration of project stages should not exceed the specified project duration. The model assumes that the following stage can begin after the previous one at the probability of task implementation and generation of new knowledge of the previous one at the level that is not below the established one. The model takes into account that the combination with the minimal total project duration and with minimal costs for realization are chosen from the possible combinations of the durations of project stages. The model involves the use of combinatorics elements to determine the possible combinations of the duration of stages. In addition, the experts’ knowledge and the direct estimation method were used to determine the weight factors of the project stages. The total probability of successful project implementation was determined as the sum of probabilities of successful realization of tasks and generation of new knowledge at each project stage, taking into consideration the corresponding weight factors. Practical implementation of the model was carried out for the project of development, content creation, and implementation of the information system and the database for the management of activity of the regional center of physical education of school youth lasting 10 months. The project consists of three stages: designing, development and testing, and implementation. It was established that the following duration of the project stages will be optimal: stage 1 – 4 months, stage 2 – 5 months, stage 3 – 1 month. At this distribution of time, the probability of successful project implementation is 0.81, costs are USD 5,440. The created model can be used for any enterprise with the purpose of planning the duration of the project works and its successful implementation within the set periodReferences
- Chaikovska I. I. (2015). Evaluation of enterprise knowledge management system. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 10 (172), 221–229. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2015_10_30
- Chaikovska, I. I. (2016). Economic-mathematical modelling of employee evaluation in the system of enterprise knowledge management. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 9 (183), 417–428. Available at:http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2016_9_49
- Chaikovska, I., Fasolko, T., Vaganova, L., Barabash, O. (2017). Economic-mathematical tools for building up a project team in the system of company’s knowledge management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (3 (87)), 29–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103185
- Silver, S. A., Harel, Z., McQuillan, R., Weizman, A. V., Thomas, A., Chertow, G. M. et. al. (2016). How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11 (5), 893–900. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.11491015
- Wiltshire, T. J., Butner, J. E., Pirtle, Z. (2017). Modeling Change in Project Duration and Completion: Scheduling Dynamics of NASA’s Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) Activities. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21 (3), 335–358. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317829195_Modeling_Change_in_Project_Duration_and_Completion_Scheduling_Dynamics_of_NASA's_Exploration_Flight_Test_1_EFT-1_Activities
- Minku, L. L., Yao, X. (2016). Which models of the past are relevant to the present? A software effort estimation approach to exploiting useful past models. Automated Software Engineering, 24 (3), 499–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-016-0209-7
- Ahmadu, H. A., Ibrahim, Y. M., Ibrahim, A. D., Abdullahi, M. (2015). Modelling building construction durations. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20 (1), 65–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-02-2014-0004
- Cardona-Meza, L. S., Olivar-Tost, G. (2017). Modeling and Simulation of Project Management through the PMBOK® Standard Using Complex Networks. Complexity, 2017, 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4791635
- Mályusz, L., Varga, A. (2017). An Estimation of the Learning Curve Effect on Project Scheduling with Calendar Days Calculation. Procedia Engineering, 196, 730–737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.001
- Archibald, R. D., Filippo, I. D., Filippo, D. D. (2012). The Six-Phase Comprehensive Project Life Cycle Model Including the Project Incubation/Feasibility Phase and the Post-Project Evaluation Phase. PM World Journal, I (V), 1–40. Available at: https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/PMWJ5-Dec2012-ARCHIBALD-DI-FILIPPO-Featured-Paper.pdf
- Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2017). M-PERT: Manual Project-Duration Estimation Technique for Teaching Scheduling Basics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143 (9), 04017063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001358
- Nefedov, L. I., Il'ge, I. G., Kalmykov, D. A. (2012). Simulation modeling of the project planning of screw shaft pipe manufacturing. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (56)), 67–70. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/3699/3466
- Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G., Minaev, D. (2016). The decision-making modeling for the building project scope evaluation in conditions of the recreational territory development. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (79)), 32–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60644
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Inna Chaikovska, Maksym Chaikovskyi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.