Development of an economic­mathematical model to determine the optimal duration of project operations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.205114

Keywords:

project duration, optimization model, economic-mathematical model, company knowledge management.

Abstract

Planning the duration of works in order to optimize the implementation time is an important component of an efficient company’s project management. The optimization economic-mathematical model for determining the duration of implementation of project stages was created in the research. The objective function is the maximization of the probability of successful project implementation and generation of new organizational knowledge at each stage. The model assumes that the sum of the duration of project stages should not exceed the specified project duration. The model assumes that the following stage can begin after the previous one at the probability of task implementation and generation of new knowledge of the previous one at the level that is not below the established one. The model takes into account that the combination with the minimal total project duration and with minimal costs for realization are chosen from the possible combinations of the durations of project stages. The model involves the use of combinatorics elements to determine the possible combinations of the duration of stages. In addition, the experts’ knowledge and the direct estimation method were used to determine the weight factors of the project stages. The total probability of successful project implementation was determined as the sum of probabilities of successful realization of tasks and generation of new knowledge at each project stage, taking into consideration the corresponding weight factors. Practical implementation of the model was carried out for the project of development, content creation, and implementation of the information system and the database for the management of activity of the regional center of physical education of school youth lasting 10 months. The project consists of three stages: designing, development and testing, and implementation. It was established that the following duration of the project stages will be optimal: stage 1 – 4 months, stage 2 – 5 months, stage 3 – 1 month. At this distribution of time, the probability of successful project implementation is 0.81, costs are USD 5,440. The created model can be used for any enterprise with the purpose of planning the duration of the project works and its successful implementation within the set period

Author Biographies

Inna Chaikovska, Leonid Yuzkov Khmelnytskyi University of Management and Law Heroiv Maidanu str., 8, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, 29013

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Mathematics, Statistics and Information Technology

Maksym Chaikovskyi, Khmelnytskyi National University Instytuts’ka str., 11, Khmelnytskyi, Ukraine, 29016

Specialist of Computer Systems and Networks

Department of Cybersecurity and Computer Systems and Networks

References

  1. Chaikovska I. I. (2015). Evaluation of enterprise knowledge management system. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 10 (172), 221–229. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2015_10_30
  2. Chaikovska, I. I. (2016). Economic-mathematical modelling of employee evaluation in the system of enterprise knowledge management. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky, 9 (183), 417–428. Available at:http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ape_2016_9_49
  3. Chaikovska, I., Fasolko, T., Vaganova, L., Barabash, O. (2017). Economic-mathematical tools for building up a project team in the system of company’s knowledge management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (3 (87)), 29–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103185
  4. Silver, S. A., Harel, Z., McQuillan, R., Weizman, A. V., Thomas, A., Chertow, G. M. et. al. (2016). How to Begin a Quality Improvement Project. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 11 (5), 893–900. doi: https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.11491015
  5. Wiltshire, T. J., Butner, J. E., Pirtle, Z. (2017). Modeling Change in Project Duration and Completion: Scheduling Dynamics of NASA’s Exploration Flight Test 1 (EFT-1) Activities. Nonlinear Dynamics, Psychology, and Life Sciences, 21 (3), 335–358. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317829195_Modeling_Change_in_Project_Duration_and_Completion_Scheduling_Dynamics_of_NASA's_Exploration_Flight_Test_1_EFT-1_Activities
  6. Minku, L. L., Yao, X. (2016). Which models of the past are relevant to the present? A software effort estimation approach to exploiting useful past models. Automated Software Engineering, 24 (3), 499–542. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10515-016-0209-7
  7. Ahmadu, H. A., Ibrahim, Y. M., Ibrahim, A. D., Abdullahi, M. (2015). Modelling building construction durations. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 20 (1), 65–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-02-2014-0004
  8. Cardona-Meza, L. S., Olivar-Tost, G. (2017). Modeling and Simulation of Project Management through the PMBOK® Standard Using Complex Networks. Complexity, 2017, 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4791635
  9. Mályusz, L., Varga, A. (2017). An Estimation of the Learning Curve Effect on Project Scheduling with Calendar Days Calculation. Procedia Engineering, 196, 730–737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.08.001
  10. Archibald, R. D., Filippo, I. D., Filippo, D. D. (2012). The Six-Phase Comprehensive Project Life Cycle Model Including the Project Incubation/Feasibility Phase and the Post-Project Evaluation Phase. PM World Journal, I (V), 1–40. Available at: https://pmworldlibrary.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/PMWJ5-Dec2012-ARCHIBALD-DI-FILIPPO-Featured-Paper.pdf
  11. Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2017). M-PERT: Manual Project-Duration Estimation Technique for Teaching Scheduling Basics. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143 (9), 04017063. doi: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001358
  12. Nefedov, L. I., Il'ge, I. G., Kalmykov, D. A. (2012). Simulation modeling of the project planning of screw shaft pipe manufacturing. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (56)), 67–70. Available at: http://journals.uran.ua/eejet/article/view/3699/3466
  13. Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G., Minaev, D. (2016). The decision-making modeling for the building project scope evaluation in conditions of the recreational territory development. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (79)), 32–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2016.60644

Downloads

Published

2020-06-30

How to Cite

Chaikovska, I., & Chaikovskyi, M. (2020). Development of an economic­mathematical model to determine the optimal duration of project operations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(3 (105), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.205114

Issue

Section

Control processes