Development of an architectural-logical model to automate the management of the process of creating complex cyber-physical industrial systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.210761

Keywords:

Industry 4.0., Smart Manufacturing, cyber-physical manufacturing systems, multi-systems, metasystem, physical world, cyber world

Abstract

Modern highly technological production puts forward new requirements and approaches to the implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept. To achieve this, it is necessary to develop a cyber-physical production system that would make it possible to fully take into consideration all the factors of the actual production system. All solutions must pursue the global goal of making the best use of production time and resources, as well as meet the "Lean Production" concept. Existing ISO-95, 5C, and 8C cyber-physical production systems (CPPS) reference architectures cannot provide clearly expressed systematization and detailing. Such systems are a set of general recommendations that show the interaction processes among the physical and cyber-components of CPPS. This paper reports a new approach to the systemic representation of the processes for managing the development of complex cyber-physical production systems in the face of today's threats. We have suggested a systemic representation of automating the process of managing the development of complex CPPS. Modern threats to the cyber-physical and information and communication systems (ICS) have been considered, which underlie CPPS. An architectural-logical model, as well as methods for automating the CPPS development process management, have been developed. This could help build a logical relationship from the initial "target" stage to the process of obtaining "management algorithms" at each level and stage of CPPS development as a symbiosis of physical and cyber-components. The devised CPPS development process management model provides an opportunity to propose a group of mathematical models and methods that logically link all development stages into a single "rigid" hierarchical sequence. This makes it possible to build a single information space with a set of complex CPPS development methodology. The proposed solutions could enable the development of an automated system to manage the process of the development of complex CPPS

Author Biographies

Igor Nevliudov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

Doctor of Engineering Sciences, Professor

Department of Computer-Integrated Technologies, Automation and Mechatronics

 

Vladyslav Yevsieiev, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer-Integrated Technologies, Automation and Mechatronics

Svitlana Maksymova, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Computer-Integrated Technologies, Automation and Mechatronics

Inna Filippenko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics Nauky ave., 14, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61166

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Design Automation

References

  1. DIN SPEC 91345:2016-04. Referenzarchitekturmodell Industrie 4.0 (RAMI4.0). doi: https://doi.org/10.31030/2436156
  2. Kunath, M., Winkler, H. (2019). Adaptive Assistenzsysteme zur Entscheidungsunterstützung für die dynamische Auftragsabwicklung: Konzeptionelle Überlegungen und Anwendungsszenarien unter Berücksichtigung des Digitalen Zwillings des Produktionssystems. Handbuch Industrie 4.0 Und Digitale Transformation, 269–294. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24576-4_12
  3. Uhlemann, T. H.-J., Lehmann, C., Steinhilper, R. (2017). The Digital Twin: Realizing the Cyber-Physical Production System for Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 61, 335–340. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.152
  4. DIN SPEC 16593-1:2018-04. Reference Model for Industrie 4.0 Service Architectures - Part 1: Basic Concepts of an Interaction-based Architecture. doi: https://doi.org/10.31030/2838942
  5. Francalanza, E., Borg, J., Constantinescu, C. (2017). A knowledge-based tool for designing cyber physical production systems. Computers in Industry, 84, 39–58. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.08.001
  6. Tomiyama, T., Moyen, F. (2018). Resilient architecture for cyber-physical production systems. CIRP Annals, 67 (1), 161–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2018.04.021
  7. Kaestner, F., Kuschnerus, D., Spiegel, C., Janssen, B., Huebner, M. (2018). Design of an efficient Communication Architecture for Cyber-Physical Production Systems. 2018 IEEE 14th International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/coase.2018.8560563
  8. Hoffmann, S., de Carvalho, A. F. P., Abele, D., Schweitzer, M., Tolmie, P., Wulf, V. (2019). Cyber-Physical Systems for Knowledge and Expertise Sharing in Manufacturing Contexts: Towards a Model Enabling Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 28 (3-4), 469–509. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-019-09355-y
  9. Ribeiro, L., Hochwallner, M. (2018). On the Design Complexity of Cyberphysical Production Systems. Complexity, 2018, 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4632195
  10. Lee, J., Bagheri, B., Kao, H.-A. (2015). A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems. Manufacturing Letters, 3, 18–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2014.12.001
  11. Jiang, J.-R. (2018). An improved cyber-physical systems architecture for Industry 4.0 smart factories. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10 (6), 168781401878419. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814018784192
  12. Ma, Z., Hudic, A., Shaaban, A., Plosz, S. (2017). Security Viewpoint in a Reference Architecture Model for Cyber-Physical Production Systems. 2017 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/eurospw.2017.65
  13. Cruz Salazar, L. A., Ryashentseva, D., Lüder, A., Vogel-Heuser, B. (2019). Cyber-physical production systems architecture based on multi-agent’s design pattern-comparison of selected approaches mapping four agent patterns. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 105 (9), 4005–4034. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03800-4
  14. Verigin, A. N., Lisitsin, N. V. (2007). Organizatsionnye sistemy: Metody issledovaniya. Sankt-Petrburg: SPbGTI(TU), 701.
  15. Shmatko, O., Balakireva, S., Vlasov, A., Zagorodna, N., Korol, O., Milov, O. et. al. (2020). Development of methodological foundations for designing a classifier of threats to cyberphysical systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (9 (105)), 6–19. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.205702
  16. Monostori, L. (2014). Cyber-physical Production Systems: Roots, Expectations and R&D Challenges. Procedia CIRP, 17, 9–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2014.03.115

Downloads

Published

2020-08-31

How to Cite

Nevliudov, I., Yevsieiev, V., Maksymova, S., & Filippenko, I. (2020). Development of an architectural-logical model to automate the management of the process of creating complex cyber-physical industrial systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(3 (106), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.210761

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (106) (2020): Control processes

Section

Control processes

License

Copyright (c) 2020 Igor Nevliudov, Vladyslav Yevsieiev, Svitlana Maksymova, Inna Filippenko

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.