Development of a method of extended cells for the formulation of boundary conditions in numerical integration of gas dynamics equations in the domains of a curvilinear shape

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.213795

Keywords:

computational gas dynamics, finite volume method, Cartesian grids, extended cells

Abstract

A method of extended cells for the formulation of boundary conditions in the numerical integration of the Euler equations in domains with curvilinear boundaries for the cases of one-dimensional and two-dimensional compressible gas flows has been proposed in this study. The proposed method is based on the use of the explicit Godunov type finite volume method on a regular rectangular Cartesian grid. The essence of the extended cell method is that when integrating the basic equations of gas dynamics in a fractional cell, numerical fluxes are calculated through the sides of the new extended cell. This new cell is constructed tangentially to the curved boundary and has a size no less than the cell size in the regular domain. Parameters inside the new cell are calculated as mean integral values over the area of the neighboring regular cells included in it. In this case, when choosing a time step in accordance with the Courant condition, the stability of the method in the main computational domain is preserved both when integrating fractional cells and when integrating regular cells. Thanks to this approach, the proposed method has low requirements for computing resources, the ability to generalize for three-dimensional space and increase the order of accuracy without major modifications of the algorithm.

To test the proposed method, solutions were obtained for the generally accepted test problems of gas dynamics: normal and double Mach reflection of a shock wave from a plane wall. The choice of the time step was made in accordance with the Courant condition in regular finite volumes. The results obtained have made it possible to assess the convergence of the proposed method and their comparison with the results of calculations using other methods have shown a good quantitative and qualitative agreement

Author Biographies

Ivan Dubrovskiy, FLIGHT CONTROL LLC Gagarina ave., 115, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49050

Modeling Engineer

Valeriy Bucharskyi, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University Gagarina ave., 72, Dnipro, Ukraine, 49010

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engine Construction

References

  1. Moukalled, F., Mangani, L., Darwish, M. (2015). The finite volume method in computational fluid dynamics. An Advanced Introduction with OpenFOAM® and Matlab. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16874-6
  2. Blazek, J. (2015). Computational Fluid Dynamics: Principles and Applications. Elsevier, 466. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/c2013-0-19038-1
  3. Chi, C., Lee, B. J., Im, H. G. (2016). An improved ghost-cell immersed boundary method for compressible flow simulations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 83 (2), 132–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.4262
  4. Berger, M. (2017). Cut Cells. Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems - Applied and Modern Issues, 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hna.2016.10.008
  5. Sidorenko, D. A., Utkin, P. S. (2018). A Cartesian grid method for the numerical modeling of shock wave propagation in domains of complex shape. Num. Meth. Prog., 17 (4), 353–364.
  6. Bennett, W. P., Nikiforakis, N., Klein, R. (2018). A moving boundary flux stabilization method for Cartesian cut-cell grids using directional operator splitting. Journal of Computational Physics, 368, 333–358. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2018.04.048
  7. Berger, M. J., LeVeque, R. J. (1990). Stable boundary conditions for Cartesian grid calculations. Computing Systems in Engineering, 1 (2-4), 305–311. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-0521(90)90016-e
  8. Berger, M., Helzel, C. (2012). A Simplified h-box Method for Embedded Boundary Grids. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 34 (2), A861–A888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1137/110829398
  9. Ferziger, J. H., Milovan, P., Street, R. L. (2020). Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics. Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99693-6
  10. Chung, T. J. (2010). Computational Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511780066
  11. Courant, R., Friedrichs, K., Lewy, H. (1967). On the Partial Difference Equations of Mathematical Physics. IBM Journal of Research and Development, 11 (2), 215–234. doi: https://doi.org/10.1147/rd.112.0215
  12. Loytsyanskiy, L. G. (2003). Mehanika zhidkosti i gaza. Moscow: Drofa, 840.
  13. Bucharskiy, V. L. (2007). Metod sovmestnoy approksimatsii postroeniya raznostnyh shem dlya resheniya uravneniy v chastnyh proizvodnyh. Tehnicheskaya mehanika, 1, 129–138.
  14. Woodward, P., Colella, P. (1984). The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics, 54 (1), 115–173. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(84)90142-6

Downloads

Published

2020-10-31

How to Cite

Dubrovskiy, I., & Bucharskyi, V. (2020). Development of a method of extended cells for the formulation of boundary conditions in numerical integration of gas dynamics equations in the domains of a curvilinear shape. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(7 (107), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.213795

Issue

Section

Applied mechanics