Investigating the influence of nano-economy management channels on global transformations in the world

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233507

Keywords:

nano-economy, baby economy, human economy, economy of nanotechnologies, self-management, nano innovation management, global transformations

Abstract

The problem under investigation is determined by the fact that enterprises consist of separate economic agents that play an increasingly important role in production processes and their management. The channels of such management provide the transfer of positive experience of the totality of economic agents to the global environment. Due to the permanent process of transformations in the world caused by this influence, the probability of being on the sidelines is a problem for most business entities. Their competitiveness and integration into the world economic networks depend on high-quality management and wide application of innovative technologies, including nanotechnologies.

The conducted study revealed that:

– nano-economy consists of baby economy, human economy, and the economy of nanotechnologies;

– the human economy is the central link and the main leader of the impact of nano-economy on global markets. The main components of its management are self-management, self-marketing, and innovative management of the organization personnel;

– nanotechnologies, the economics of nanotechnologies, and transfer of nano-knowledge are at the initial stage of their development;

– the impact of nano-economy on the development of the global environment is carried out through the functions of nanomanagement;

 the management channels of the nano-economy do not affect the entry of countries with transition economies into the global environment due to the fact that they lack the system of nano-economy. This is proved by multifactor analysis of the impact of nano-economy on exports. The obtained indicators, such as exports of USD 57 billion (by the exchange rate of 2021), 281 universities, 1,941,701 business entities, and 135 thousand scientific and technical institutions, do not correlate and determine low direct and inverse indicators of dependence.

The results of the study can be used:

– at separate enterprises – by using innovative personnel management, including motivating and training of personnel in self-management and self-marketing; 

– at the state and regional levels – by creating favorable conditions for the development of baby economy in countries with transition economies and by promoting optimal solutions of separate economic agents

Author Biographies

Tetiana Ostapenko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

Oleksandr Onopriienko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

Iryna Hrashchenko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

Elvira Danilova, National Aviation University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Management Foreign Economic Activity of Enterprises

References

  1. Arrow, K. (1987). Refl ections on the essays. Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy. London, 727–734. doi: http://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-07357-3_36
  2. Satir, V. (1992). Kak stroit sebya i svoyu semyu. Moscow, 192.
  3. Andriushyna, L., Trynyak, M., Kakovkina, O., Shuba, V. et. al. (2020). Mindset as a value-related and conceptual factor of economic development of post-colonial states. Economic Annals-ХХI, 184 (7-8), 79–93. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v184-08
  4. Senge, P., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Roth, G., Ross, R., Smith, B. (2004). The Dance of Change: The Challenges to Sustaining Momentum in Learning Organizations. Moscow, 601.
  5. Abramov, A., Sapronov, A. (2019). Sociocultural dimension of traditional and modern forms of consumer motivation. Economic Annals-ХХI, 180 (11-12), 40–47. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v180-05
  6. Sull, D. (2004). Pochemu khoroshie kompaniyi terpyat neudachi, i kak vydayuschiesya menedzhery ikh vozrozhdayut. Moscow, 214.
  7. Tichi, N., Devanna, M. R. (1990). Lidery reorganizatsiyi: iz opyta amerikanskikh korporatsіy. Moscow, 204.
  8. Chirikova, A. (2002). Krizis liderstva i novye tsennosti globalnogo menedzhmenta. Persona-Miks, 2.
  9. Ishchenko, I., Bashkeieva, O., Petrov, P. (2019). Empirical model of congruence of mental space as a tool for the analysis of changes in international relations. Economic Annals-ХХI, 176 (3-4), 4–12. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v176-01
  10. Frankovský, M., Birknerová, Z., Zbihlejová, L., Medviď, M. et. al. (2018). Social intelligence in the cultural context: comparison of Ukrainian and Slovak managers. Economic Annals-ХХI, 169 (1-2), 62–66. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v169-12
  11. Prisco, G. (2006). Globalization and Open Source Nano Economy. Available at: http://www.kurzweilai.net/globalization-and-open-source-nano-economy
  12. Kleyner, G. B. (1996). Sovremennaya ekonomika Rossiyi kak «ekonomika fizicheskikh lits. Voprosy ekonomiki, 4.
  13. Kleyner, G. B. (1997). Nanoekonomika. Anatomiya esche odnogo strannogo rossiyskogo fenomena. Yuridicheskiy vestnik, 22.
  14. Kichurchak, M. (2020). Evaluation of cultural sphere development in the European Union countries as a factor of forming social capital and creative industries: experience for Ukraine. Economic Annals-ХХI, 184 (7-8), 68–78. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v184-07
  15. Steshenko, J., Artemyev, A., Myktybaev, T., Khavanova, I., Masterov, A., Ponomareva, M. (2019). Assessment of the impact of socio-economic factors on productivity increase. Economic Annals-ХХI, 177 (5-6), 70–81. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v177-06
  16. Inshakov, O. V. (2007). Nanoekonomika i ekonomicheskaya genetika. Volgograd, 94.
  17. Manakhova, I. V. (2011). Nanoeconomics: Many-Level Approach to Research of Economic Relations. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Ser. Ekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, 11 (2), 8–12.
  18. Chumachenko, B., Lavrov, K. (2001). Nanotekhnologii – klyuchevoy prioritet obozrimogo buduschego. Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya, 5. 71–75.
  19. Ostapenko, T. (2015). Baby-economy as a factor of efficiency increaseof human potential using in conditions of globalization. Zovnishnia torhivlia: ekonomika, finansy, pravo. Seriia: Ekonomichni nauky, 3 (80), 66–73.
  20. Okunevičiūtė Neverauskienė, L., Pranskeviciute, I. (2018). Contribution of the economic and social sector to economic development: the case of the UK, Sweden and Lithuania. Economic Annals-ХХI, 174 (11-12), 10–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v174-02
  21. Ligonenko, L., Borysov, Y., Hromozdova, L., Deineha, I., Leontovych, S., Kosiak, I. et. al. (2021). Defining the socio-demographic predictors of priority investment in the context of tasks for the financial subsystem of startup-management. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (13 (109)), 15–25. doi: http://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225639
  22. Palyvoda, О. М. (2015). Enterprise clusters in the environment of poor economic confidence. Actual problems of economics, 6, 202–210.
  23. Zhyhalkevych, Zh. M. (2014). Innovatsiina paradyhma klasteroutvorennia. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy. Visnyk Berdianskoho universytetu menedzhmentu i biznesu, 2 (26), 79–83.
  24. Chaika, H. L. (2014). Samomenedzhment menedzhera. Kyiv: Znannia, 422.
  25. Kytskai, L. I. (2016). Selfmarketing as a tool of successful employmentand forming image of employee. Investytsiia: praktyka i dosvid, 6, 26–31. Available at: http://www.investplan.com.ua/pdf/6_2016/6.pdf
  26. Rakhmetova, A., Budeshov, Y. (2020). Quality of life as an indicator of public management performance in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-ХХI, 184 (7-8), 133–153. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v184-12
  27. Shumpeter, Y. (1982). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Moscow: Progress, 560.
  28. Vanyushina, N., Makarova, A., Shanturova, G. (2020). An integrative model of emotional intelligence development of the Chinese secondary language personality in the context of modern management. Economic Annals-ХХI, 183 (5-6), 142–149. doi: http://doi.org/10.21003/ea.v183-14
  29. Schmarzo, B. (2020). Mastering Nanoeconomics in the Era of Digital Transformation. The Economic Data, Analytics Digital Transformation. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/mastering-nanoeconomics-era-digital-transformation-bill-schmarzo/

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Ostapenko, T., Onopriienko, O., Hrashchenko, I., & Danilova, E. (2021). Investigating the influence of nano-economy management channels on global transformations in the world . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13 (111), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233507

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology