Approach to assessment of prerequisites for implementation of strategic directions of innovative development of industrial enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233520

Keywords:

innovative development, directions of innovative development, prerequisites for innovative development, industrial enterprises, strategic management

Abstract

The present research substantiates the theorical and methodological foundations of quantitative assessment of the prerequisites for the implementation of strategic directions of innovative development of industrial enterprises under conditions of changing technological arrangement and the fourth industrial revolution. External and internal prerequisites for catching-up, leading and outstripping innovative development were determined and systematized. The two-step approach to assessing the sufficiency of prerequisites for the implementation of these directions was developed. It was proposed to assess external prerequisites according to the relative values of the indicators of the Global Innovation Index of the analyzed country, which take into account the highest and the lowest estimates of all countries Unlike existing approaches, the point-based score, rather than rating estimates of the indicators of countries are taken into account, which increases the assessment objectivity. The compliance of quantitative estimates with the levels of sufficiency of external prerequisites was determined using the Harrington Verbal-Numerical scale. It was proposed to assess internal prerequisites according to the author’s method of expert evaluations, which unlike existing ones, allows assessing the level of sufficiency of subsystems of the potential of innovative development of an enterprise. The two-step approach allows quantitative and comprehensive assessment of sufficiency of the prerequisites for the implementation of strategic directions of innovative development of industrial enterprises. It is possible to identify problems of prerequisites’ sufficiency, which allows their reasonable correction. The sufficiency of prerequisites for alternative directions of innovative development of machine-building enterprises was evaluated using the new approach and the best directions were chosen. The analysis time was reduced by 25–33 %, the accuracy of choice of directions and the effectiveness of their implementation strategies are increasing. The new approach improves strategic management of innovative development of industrial enterprises in the context of technological transformations

Author Biographies

Sergiy Illiashenko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»; University of Economics and Humanities in Bielsko-Biala

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Management of Innovative Entrepreneurship and International Economic Relations

Doctor Habilitatus, Professor

Nataliia Illiashenko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»; Sumy National Agricultural University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

Senior Researcher

Research Section

Yuliia Shypulina, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

Diana Raiko, National Technical University «Kharkіv Polytechnic Institute»

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Marketing Management

Viktoriia Bozhkova, Sumy State Pedagogical University named after A. S. Makarenka

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Business Economics and Administration

References

  1. Shvab, K. (2016). Chetvertaya promyshlennaya revolyutsiya. Moscow: Eksmo, 208.
  2. Cassiman, B., Valentini, G. (2015). Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary? Strategic Management Journal, 37 (6), 1034–1046. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2375
  3. Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M.; Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (Eds.) (2014). Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. New frontiers in open innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–28. doi: http://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199682461.003.0001
  4. Vanhaverbeke, W. (2017). Managing Open Innovation in SMEs. Cambridge University Press, 234. doi: http://doi.org/10.1017/9781139680981
  5. Marra, A., Carlei, V., Baldassari, C. (2020) Exploring networks of proximity for partner selection, firms' collaboration and knowledge exchange. The case of clean-tech industry. Business strategy and the environment, 29 (3), 1034–1044. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2415
  6. Zhou, C., Wang, R. (2020). From invention to innovation: the role of knowledge-intensive business services in technology commercialisation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 32 (12), 1436–1448. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2020.1774053
  7. Marx, M., Gans, J. S., Hsu, D. H. (2014). Dynamic Commercialization Strategies for Disruptive Technologies: Evidence from the Speech Recognition Industry. Management Science, 60 (12), 3103–3123. doi: http://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.2035
  8. Khedhaouria, A., Jamal, A. (2015). Sourcing knowledge for innovation: knowledge reuse and creation in project teams. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19 (5), 932–948. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/jkm-01-2015-0039
  9. Himang, C., Ocampo, L., Obiso, J.-J., Bongo, M., Caballes, S. A., Abellana, D. P. et. al. (2020). Defining stages of the Industry 4.0 adoption via indicator sets. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12 (2), 32–55. doi: http://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0010
  10. Naqshbandi, M. M., Jasimuddin, S. M. (2018). Knowledge-oriented leadership and open innovation: Role of knowledge management capability in France-based multinationals. International Business Review, 27 (3), 701–713. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2017.12.001
  11. Mardani, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M., Doustar, M. (2018). The Relationship Between Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29 (1), 12–26. doi: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.002
  12. Dougherty, D. (2016). Organizing for innovation in complex innovation systems. Innovation, 19 (1), 11–15. doi: http://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1245109
  13. Vepo do Nascimento Welter, C., Oneide Sausen, J., Rossetto, C. R. (2020). The development of innovative capacity as a strategic resource in technology-based incubation activities. Revista de Gestão, 27 (2), 169–188. doi: http://doi.org/10.1108/rege-02-2019-0034
  14. Downs, J. B., Hossfeld, O., Velamuri, V. K. (2019). The EC-LQO five-factor framework: An alternative lens for business model innovation in highly knowledge-intensive industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 40 (3), 309–320. doi: http://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3003
  15. Moskalenko, O. (2014). The advanced development and conceptual bases of the modern state’s economic policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2 (2), 4–7.
  16. Fedulova, L. I. (2015). National innovative systems development trends: lessons for Ukraine. Actual Problems of Economics, 4 (166), 94–104.
  17. Analysis (2020). The Global Innovation Index. Available at: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/analysis-indicator
  18. Yahelska, K. Yu. (2015). Vyperedzhaiuchyi natsionalnyi ekonomichnyi rozvytok: teoretyko-metodolohichnyi ta prykladnyi aspekty. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury, 349.
  19. Berdar, M., Yevtushevska, O. (2020). Innovation Activity Management of Enterprises Under Self-Development. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 6 (2), 25–31. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2020-6-2-25-31
  20. Polyakov, M. V. (2017). Knowledge management in international companies: theoretical and methodological fundamentals, main directions and mechanism. Efektyvna ekonomika, 7. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=5690
  21. Rudenko, M., Kryvoruchko, V. (2016). Knowledge management as a competitive advantage of enterprise. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 4, 74–78.
  22. Smolinska, N. V., Hrybyk, I. I. (2015). Knowledge management as a tool of enterprise innovation support. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu «Lvivska politekhnika». Seriia: Problemy ekonomiky ta upravlinnia, 815, 248–255.
  23. Shypulina, Yu. S. (2017). Upravlinnia rozvytkom innovatsiinoi kultury promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Sumy: TOV «Trytoriia», 432.
  24. Fayvishenko, D., Dubovyk, T., Savchuk, A., Romanchenko, T. (2020). Strategic impact of innovations on enterprises financial state. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 4 (35), 411–417. doi: http://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v4i35.222442
  25. Kreidych, I., Bielova, A., Olijnyk, G. (2019). Forming the conditions of innovative development of enterprises in the transformation economy. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 5 (4), 122–129. doi: http://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-4-122-129
  26. Kosenko, O. P. (2015). Komertsializatsiia intelektualno-innovatsiinykh tekhnolohiyi. Kharkiv: NTU «KhPI», 599.
  27. Pererva, P. G., Kosenko, A. P., Kobielieva, T. A., Tkachev, M. M., Tkacheva, N. P. (2017). Financial and technological leverage in the system of economic evaluation of innovative technologies. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, 2 (23), 405–413. doi: http://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i23.121920
  28. Maslak, O., Grishko, N., Vorobiova, K., Hlazunova, O., Maslak, M. (2017). Developing the intra-firm technology transfer system at the industrial enterprise based on matrix approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 15 (3), 242–252. doi: http://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.15(3-1).2017.08
  29. Shypulina, Yu. S.; Illiashenko, S. M. (Ed.) (2006). Pokaznyky, kryterii i metodyka diahnostyky innovatsiinoho potentsialu promyslovoho pidpryiemstva. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsiinoho rozvytku. Sumy: VTD "Universytetska knyha", 321–349.
  30. Illiashenko, N. S. (2019). Upravlinnia vyperedzhaiuchym innovatsiinym rozvytkom promyslovykh pidpryiemstv. Sumy: TOV Trytoriia, 504.
  31. Shumpeter, Y. (1982). Teoriya ekonomicheskogo razvitiya. Moscow: Progress, 456.
  32. Harrington, E. C. (1965). The Desirability Function. Industrial Quality Control, 21, 494–498.
  33. Hryshchenko, O. F., Holysheva, Ye. O., Makarenko, Ye. V., Illiashenko, N. S.; Illiashenko, N. S. (Ed.) (2018). Praktychni aspekty diialnosti uspishnykh mizhnarodnykh kompaniyi na prykladi vyperedzhalnoho rozvytku krain «aziiski tyhry». Vyperedzhaiuchyi innovatsiinyi rozvytok: teoriia, metodyka, praktyka. Sumy: Trytoriia, 153–162.
  34. Gradov, A. P., Kuzin, B. I. (Eds.) (1996). Strategiya i taktika antikrizisnogo upravleniya firmoy. Saint Petersburg: Spetsialnaya literatura, 510.
  35. Illiashenko, S., Shypulina, Y., Illiashenko, N., Gryshchenko, O., Derykolenko, A. (2020). Knowledge management at Ukrainian industrial enterprises in the context of innovative development. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 12 (3), 43–56. doi: http://doi.org/10.2478/emj-2020-0018

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Illiashenko, S., Illiashenko, N., Shypulina, Y., Raiko, D., & Bozhkova, V. (2021). Approach to assessment of prerequisites for implementation of strategic directions of innovative development of industrial enterprises . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(13 (111), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.233520

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 13 (111) (2021): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Сергей Николаевич Ильяшенко, Наталья Сергеевна Ильяшенко, Юлия Сергеевна Шипулина, Диана Валерьевна Райко, Виктория Викторовна Божкова

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.