Comparison of fly ash with Lapindo mud as a land stabilizer for landfill in Pasuruan–Indonesia

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.234518

Keywords:

landfill, soil stability, fly ash, Lapindo mud, sieve testing, compaction, silt, specific gravity, direct shear test, internal shear angle

Abstract

The paper discusses the comparison of fly ash with Lapindo mud as a land stabilizer for a landfill in Pasuruan, Indonesia. Land for landfills has a low level of stability due to the condition of garbage that has accumulated and undergoes a process of decay. This land condition is less favorable to support the construction of the building above it if one day the location is used for construction. Therefore, it is necessary to stabilize the soil first. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of adding a mixture of TPA soil with fly ash and Lapindo mud. The method used by sieve testing and compaction of the specimens for each treatment consisted of a mixture of TPA soil with fly ash and TPA soil with Lapindo mud, while the percentages of fly ash and Lapindo mud to the dry weight of the original soil were respectively 0 %, 10 %, 15 %, and 20 %. The results showed that stabilization of the landfill with fly ash reduced the silt content while stabilization with Lapindo mud increased the levels of silt in the landfill so that fly ash was better than Lapindo mud for stabilization of the landfill. The specific gravity values for both stabilization mixtures increased equally. Based on the results of the standard compaction test for the addition of a mixture of fly ash, the OMC value decreases and the greater the value of dmaxs indicates that fly ash is good for landfill stabilization, while the addition of a mixture of Lapindo mud increases the OMC the smaller the value of dmaxs. For the direct shear test of the two mixed soils, the value of the internal friction angle (Æ) increased. The percentage value of the optimum mixture of mixed soil+fly ash is 14 % with an internal shear angle (Æ) of 38°, while the stabilization of landfill with Lapindo mud obtained the optimum mixture percentage value of 11 % with an internal shear angle (Æ) of 31°

Supporting Agency

  • Thank you to the Institute for Research and Community Service (LPPM), the University of Widyagama Malang who has funded this research.

Author Biographies

Agus Tugas Sudjianto, University of Widyagama Malang

Associate Professor

Department of Civil Engineering

Abdul Halim, University of Widyagama Malang

Doctor

Department of Civil Engineering

Oktiono Gembiranto, University of Widyagama Malang

Department of Civil Engineering

Sugeng Hadi Susilo, State Polytechnic of Malang

Doctor

Departmentof Mechanical Engineering

References

  1. Ayilara, M., Olanrewaju, O., Babalola, O., Odeyemi, O. (2020). Waste Management through Composting: Challenges and Potentials. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4456. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114456
  2. Prayitno, P., Rulianah, S., Zamrudy, W., Susilo, S. H. (2021). An analysis of performance of an anaerobic fixed film biofilter (AnF2B) reactor in treatment of cassava wastewater. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (10 (109)), 6–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.225324
  3. Alamanis, N., Chouliaras, I. (2018). Improvements to loose soil. American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences, 43 (1), 190–210.
  4. Xia, H., Zhang, J., Cai, J., Pan, H., She, X. (2020). Study on the Bearing Capacity and Engineering Performance of Aeolian Sand. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering, 2020, 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3426280
  5. Sudjianto, A. T. (2017). Pengaruh Penambahan Fly Ash Terhadap Daya Dukung Tanah Bekas Timbunan Sampah ( Landfill). Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 13 (4), 308. doi: https://doi.org/10.24002/jts.v13i4.938
  6. Sudjianto, A. T. (2012). Stabilisasi landfiil dengan fly ash. Widya Teknika, 20 (2), 1–8.
  7. Nuruddin, M. F., Hasbi, A. F., Abdullah, M. M. A. B. (2015). Sidoarjo mud: creating worth from waste. Ecosystems and Sustainable Development X. doi: https://doi.org/10.2495/eco150281
  8. Rosanti, W. M., Winanti, E. T. (2016). Pemanfaatan Lumpur Lapindo Dan Fly Ash Sebagai Bahan Campuran Pada Pembuatan Bata Beton Ringan. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil, 2 (2), 1–7.
  9. Susilo, S. H., Asrori, A. (2021). Analysis of position and rotation direction of double stirrer on chaotic advection behavior. EUREKA: Physics and Engineering, 2, 78–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.21303/2461-4262.2021.001707
  10. Meyer-Dombard, D. R., Bogner, J. E., Malas, J. (2020). A Review of Landfill Microbiology and Ecology: A Call for Modernization With “Next Generation” Technology. Frontiers in Microbiology, 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01127
  11. Anggraini, S., Susanto, E., Rudianto, S. P. (2016). Impact of Land Disaster to the Change of Spatial Planning and Economic Growth (Case Study: Sidoarjo, East Java, Indonesia). Available at: https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/fig2016/papers/ts08a/TS08A_anggraini_susanto_et_al_8115.pdf
  12. Novenanto, A. (2009). ‘The Lapindo Case’ by Mainstream Media l. Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 125–138.
  13. Susilo, S. H., Suparman, S., Mardiana, D., Hamidi, N. (2016). The Effect of Velocity Ratio Study on Microchannel Hydrodynamics Focused of Mixing Glycerol Nitration Reaction. Periodica Polytechnica Mechanical Engineering, 60 (4), 228–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/ppme.8894
  14. Onyelowe, K., Okafor, F. O. (2012). A comparative review of soil modification methods. ARPN Journal of Earth Sciences, 1 (2), 36–41.
  15. Hastuty, I. P. (2019). Comparison of the Use of Cement, Gypsum, and Limestone on the Improvement of Clay through Unconfined Compression Test. Journal of the Civil Engineering Forum, 5 (2), 131. doi: https://doi.org/10.22146/jcef.43792
  16. Mulyono, A., Aryani, S. M., Lulut, J. (2014). Recycling Roof Tile Waste Material for Wall Cover Tiles. MAKARA Journal of Technology Series, 17 (3). doi: https://doi.org/10.7454/mst.v17i3.2931
  17. Damare, A., Gupta, P., Baweja, R. (2017). Utilization of Granite Powder in Cement Mortar. International Journal of Research Publications in Engineering and Technology, 3 (6), 69–72. Available at: https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/342901-utilization-of-granite-powder-in-cement-6728a5bf.PDF
  18. Purnomo, T., Rachmadiarti, F., Soegiyanto, S. (2018). Impact of Lapindo Hot Mud Flowing on Macrozoobenthos Communities in Estuary Porong, East Java. Proceedings of the International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST 2018). doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/icst-18.2018.11
  19. Utami, G. S. (2014). Clay soil stabilization with lime effect the value CBR and swelling. ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 9 (10), 1744–1748.
  20. Makusa, G. P. (2012). Soil Stabilization Methods and Materials in Engineering Practice. Luleå, 35. Available at: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A997144/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Downloads

Published

2021-06-30

How to Cite

Sudjianto, A. T., Halim, A., Gembiranto, O., & Susilo, S. H. (2021). Comparison of fly ash with Lapindo mud as a land stabilizer for landfill in Pasuruan–Indonesia. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(10(111), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.234518