Devising a procedure for justifying the need for samples of weapons and weapon target assignment when using a reconnaissance firing system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.241616Keywords:
reconnaissance firing systems, methods of nonlinear programming, method of two functions, combat potentialAbstract
This paper proposes an algorithm to substantiate the need for weapons samples, as well as targeting when using a reconnaissance firing system taking into consideration the peculiarities of functioning of such systems. The algorithm essentially implies streamlining the stages in determining the magnitude of the reduction of the enemy's combat potential and, on its basis, the formation of the need for the number of weapons by type. The algorithm makes it possible to take into consideration the nonlinearity of functions that describe both different types of weapons and targets. In addition, this algorithm is based on a modified method of nonlinear programming (two functions). The modification involves the use of a normalized share of the weight of each target as weight coefficients. This allows for targeting while taking into consideration the established level of the combat potential of an enemy.
A procedure for determining the need for samples of weapons and targeting in the use of reconnaissance firing systems has been devised. It was determined that in order to achieve the goal of enemy fire damage, it is not typically necessary to use all weapons samples. In general, the procedure makes it possible to take into consideration the peculiarities of the samples of weapons and their suitability to hit a certain target. That could prevent problems with overspending of resources, failures in the detection-defeat cycle, non-fulfillment (not fully performing) tasks during enemy fire damage.
In general, the algorithm and procedure for determining the need for the samples of weapons and targeting when using a reconnaissance firing system testify to devising a methodology for justifying the need for weapons samples and targeting. The performance and adequacy of this procedure have been tested by considering an example of determining the need for weapons samples and targeting and obtaining the result confirmed by the experience in the use of reconnaissance firing systems
References
- Perry, W. L., Darilek, R. E., Rohn, L. L., Sollinger, J. M. (Eds.) (2015). Operation IRAQI FREEDOM: Decisive War, Elusive Peace. RAND Corporation, 31–56. Available at: https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/research_reports/RR1200/RR1214/RAND_RR1214.pdf
- Bensahel, N., Oliker, O., Crane, K., Brennan, R., Gregg, H., Sullivan, T., Rathmell, A. (2008). Chapter Two. Military Planning Efforts. After Saddam: Prewar Planning and the Occupation of Iraq. RAND Corporation, 5–20. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg642a.10?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
- Lambeth, B. (2005). Chapter Five. Operation Anaconda. Air Power Against Terror: America's Conduct of Operation Enduring Freedom. RAND Corporation, 163–246. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg166centaf.13?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
- Asher, D. (Ed.) (2014). Inside Israel's Northern Command: The Yom Kippur War on the Syrian Border. University Press of Kentucky, 704. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt19jcgzg
- Luttwak, E. N. (2001). Strategy: The Logic of War and Peace, Revised and Enlarged Edition. Harvard University Press, 320. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1c7zfsc
- Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Karavanov, O., Stetsiv, S., Shcherba, A. (2021). Devising a procedure for justifying the choice of reconnaissance-firing systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (109)), 60–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.224324
- Maistrenko, O., Ryzhov, Y., Khaustov, D., Tsbulia, S., Nastishin, Y. (2021). Decision-Making Model for Task Execution by a Military Unit in Terms of Queuing Theory. Military Operations Research, 26 (1), 59–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.5711/1082598326159
- Balkovetz, B. (2005). Lessons From the Front. Phalanx, 38 (2), 6–8. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/24909430
- Demidko, L., Trofimenko, P., Sorokoumov, G., Lugovskiy, I. (2018). Directions of improvement of automated control systems for artillery of army troops of armed forces of Ukraine. Systems of Arms and Military Equipment, 2, 83–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/soivt.2018.54.11
- Raymond, A. D. (1993). ASSESSING COMBAT POWER: A Methodology for Tactical Battle Staffs. Kansas: School of Advanced Military Studies, US Army Command and General Staff College.
- Ben-Haim, Y. (2018). WEI/WUV for Assessing Force Effectiveness: Managing Uncertainty with Info-Gap Theory. Military Operations Research, 23 (4), 37–50. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/26553096
- Ozdemirel, N. E., Kandiller, L. (2006). Semi-dynamic modelling of heterogeneous land combat. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57 (1), 38–51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601940
- Trotsenko, K. A. (2008). O realizatsii boevyh vozmozhnostey takticheskoy gruppirovki voysk. Voennaya mysl', 6, 70–75. Available at: http://militaryarticle.ru/voennaya-mysl/2008-vm/10159-o-realizacii-boevyh-vozmozhnostej-takticheskoj
- Shalyhin, A., Nerubatsky, V., Smyk, S. (2021). Methods of Assessment of Combat Potentials of Unmanned Aircraft Systems, Their Divisions and Groups. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 2 (43), 73–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.43.10
- Uhm, H. S., Lee, Y. H. (2019). A Heuristic Algorithm for Weapon Target Assignment and Scheduling. Military Operations Research, 24 (4), 53–62. Available at: https://yonsei.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/a-heuristic-algorithm-for-weapon-target-assignment-and-scheduling
- Salim (Al-khalidi), A. S. R., Hamid, W. M. (2001). A Bayesian Stochastic Formulation of Lanchester Combat Theory. Military Operations Research, 6 (3), 69–76. doi: https://doi.org/10.5711/morj.6.3.69
- Green, D. J., Moore, J. T., Borsi, J. J. (1997). An Integer Solution Heuristic for the Arsenal Exchange Model (AEM). Military Operations Research, 3 (2), 5–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.5711/morj.3.2.5
- Ma, L., Wang, G. (2020). A Solving Algorithm for Nonlinear Bilevel Programing Problems Based on Human Evolutionary Model. Algorithms, 13 (10), 260. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/a13100260
- Karavanov, O. (2021). One of decisions the weapon-target assignment (WTA) problem. Débats Scientifiques Et Orientations Prospectives Du Développement Scientifique. Vol. 2. Paris, 87–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.36074/logos-05.02.2021.v2.28
- Open’ko, P., Mirnenko, V. I., Tуurin, V. V., Myronіuk, M. Y., Doska, О. M., Bulay, A. M. (2021). Calculation Method Modification of Spare Parts Quan-tity to Restore Operability of Weapon Systems. Advances in Military Technology, 16 (1), 121–132. doi: https://doi.org/10.3849/aimt.01479
- Atrokhov, A. V., Verner, I. E., Havalko, V. I., Kozakov, V. I. (2005). Osnovy modeliuvannia boiovykh diy viysk. Kyiv: NAOU, 484.
- Maistrenko, O., Karavanov, O., Riman, O., Kurban, V., Shcherba, A., Volkov, I. et. al. (2021). Devising a procedure for substantiating the type and volume of redundant structural-functional elements of reconnaissance-firing systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (110)), 31–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.229031
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Oleksandr Maistrenko, Vitalii Khoma, Oleksandr Lykholot, Andrii Shcherba, Oleksandr Yakubovskyi, Stanislav Stetsiv, Alexander Kornienko, Andrii Savelіev
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.