Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.246414

Keywords:

reengineering of aircraft objects, analytical standard, accuracy of shapes and sizes, technological equipment

Abstract

The subject of this research is the technology of reengineering and control of parts of aircraft objects (AOs) and technological equipment for their manufacture. The predefined accuracy of the keel of a light aircraft and molding surfaces of technological equipment for its manufacture has been ensured by using reengineering technology and CAD systems. A portrait of the actual physically existing keel of a light aircraft was built in the *.stl file format using the software Artec Studio (USA). The control and comparison of the geometry of the shapes of the analytical standard with the actual physically existing keel of a light aircraft based on its portrait have been implemented. The methods used are the analysis and synthesis of the experimental geometry of shapes, the method of expert evaluations. The following results were obtained: based on the analysis and synthesis, the presence of significant errors in the accuracy of the manufacture of the keel for a light aircraft in the range from −5.26 mm to +5.39 mm was detected. It has been shown that the key factor is the keel's relative plane indicator, which is outside the tolerance margin and is 85 %. It was decided to fabricate new technological equipment from another material – organic plastics. Control of the technological equipment made from organic plastics for the keel of a light aircraft showed that the shape-forming surfaces of the equipment have appropriate shapes and sizes corresponding to the existing analytical standard and are devoid of inaccuracies that occurred in the previous version. The range of keel margins that was made using the new technological equipment from organic plastics is from –0.51 mm to +0.34 mm while the relative plane of the keel outside the tolerance margin does not exceed 15 %. The study results showed the adequacy of the decisions taken, ensuring the predefined accuracy for the keel of a light aircraft and molding surfaces of technological equipment for its manufacture.

Author Biographies

Kateryna Maiorova, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Iurii Vorobiov, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Maksym Boiko, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Postgraduate Student

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Valeriia Suponina, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Postgraduate Student

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Oleh Komisarov, Motor Sich JSC

Production Director

References

  1. Pekarsh, A. I., Feoktistov, D. G., Kolyhalov, V. I., Shport, S. I. (2011). Koordinatno-izmeritel'nye mashiny i kompleksy. Nauka i tekhnologii v promyshlennosti, 3, 36–48.
  2. Stojkic, Z., Culjak, E., Saravanja, L. (2020). 3D Measurement - Comparison of CMM and 3D Scanner. Proceedings of the 31st International DAAAM Symposium 2020, 0780–0787. doi: https://doi.org/10.2507/31st.daaam.proceedings.108
  3. Budzik, G., Kubiak, K., Zaborniak, M., Przeszłowski, Ł., Dziubek, T., Cygan, R. et. al. (2014). Analysis of dimensional accuracy of blade of aircraft engine using a coordinate measuring machine. Journal of KONES. Powertrain and Transport, 21 (2), 33–37. doi: https://doi.org/10.5604/12314005.1133862
  4. Zhang, D., Luo, M., Wu, B., Zhang, Y. (2021). Intelligent Machining of Complex Aviation Components. Research on Intelligent Manufacturing. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1586-3
  5. Bychkov, I., Maiorova, K., Suponina, V., Riabikov, S. (2020). Reengineering based on 3D-scanning in the process of propeller analytical standard constructing for an ultra-light twin-seat aircraft. ΛΌГOΣ, 31–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.36074/24.04.2020.v2.09
  6. Tikhonov, A. I., Sazonov, A. A., Novikov, S. V. (2019). Digital Aviation Industry in Russia. Russian Engineering Research, 39 (4), 349–353. doi: https://doi.org/10.3103/s1068798x19040178
  7. ISO 9001:2015. Quality management systems – Requirements. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
  8. Kritskiy, D., Alexander, K., Juliia, P., Koba, S. (2018). Modeling the Characteristics of Complex Projects Using Parallel Computing. 2018 IEEE 13th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/stc-csit.2018.8526667
  9. Huda, Z. (2012). Reengineering of manufacturing process design for quality assurance in axle- hubs of a modern car – a case study. International Journal of Automotive Technology, 13 (7), 1113–1118. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-012-0113-5
  10. Asgharizadeh, E., Haghnegahdar, L., Ghorbani, H. (2011). Reengineering Based on Using Artificial Neural Networks in Manufacturing and Production Industries. World Applied Sciences Journal, 14 (10), 1515–1522. Available at: http://www.idosi.org/wasj/wasj14(10)11/11.pdf
  11. Anwar, M. Y., Ikramullah, S., Mazhar, F. (2014). Reverse engineering in modeling of aircraft propeller blade - first step to product optimization. IIUM Engineering Journal, 15 (2), 43–57. doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v15i2.497
  12. Wróbel, K. (2020). Expert Systems in the Reengineering of Technological Equipment. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 294–301. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51981-0_37
  13. Yurdakul, M., İç, Y. T., Celek, O. E. (2021). Design of the Assembly Systems for Airplane Structures. Design Engineering and Science, 521–541. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49232-8_18
  14. Xu, J., Su, H., Zhang, H. (2021). Research on Design Collaboration of Aircraft Digital Mock up for Suppliers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2006 (1), 012066. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2006/1/012066
  15. Pohudina, O., Kritskiy, D., Bykov, A. N., Szalay, T. (2020). Method for Identifying and Counting Objects. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 161–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37618-5_15
  16. Toche, B., Pellerin, R., Fortin, C., Huet, G. (2012). Set-Based Prototyping with Digital Mock-Up Technologies. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 299–309. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_26
  17. Toth, G. (2021). Real Analytic Plane Geometry. Elements of Mathematics, 207–261. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75051-0_5
  18. ISO 1101:2004. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Geometrical tolerancing – tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. Available at: https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/1147.html
  19. ISO 1101:2017. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) – Geometrical tolerancing – tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. Available at: https://www.iso.org/ru/standard/66777.html
  20. Sikulskiy, V., Kashcheyeva, V., Romanenkov, Y., Shapoval, A. (2017). Study of the process of shape-formation of ribbed double-curvature panels by local deforming. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (1 (88)), 43–49. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.108190
  21. Wang, P., Jin, X., Li, S., Wang, C., Zhao, H. (2019). Digital Modeling of Slope Micro-geomorphology Based on Artec Eva 3D Scanning Technology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 252, 052116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/252/5/052116
  22. Szilvśi-Nagy, M., Mátyási, G. (2003). Analysis of STL files. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38 (7-9), 945–960. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0895-7177(03)90079-3

Downloads

Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

Maiorova, K., Vorobiov, I., Boiko, M., Suponina, V., & Komisarov, O. (2021). Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(1 (114), 6–12. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.246414

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (114) (2021): Engineering technological systems

Section

Engineering technological systems

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Kateryna Maiorova, Iurii Vorobiov, Maksym Boiko, Valeriia Suponina, Oleh Komisarov

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.