Improving methods for evaluating the results of digitizing public corporations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.248122

Keywords:

public corporations, digitalization, business processes, digital transformation, blockchain, digitalization system model

Abstract

The list, nature, and directions in changing the business processes of public corporations due to digital transformation have been determined. The main digital technologies that are used by public corporations operating in the basic sectors of the national economy were grouped. It has been proven that one of the most important criteria for digital transformation is the level of information transparency.

A morphological matrix of digital transformation of public corporations has been built and the positions of the latter in the process under study have been determined. Based on the results of the matrix assessment, it was concluded that the most attention is attracted by the digitalization processes in corporations-outsiders. This is because this position is characterized by a high level of digital maturity but a low level of transparency. To ensure a high level of transparency, it seems appropriate for these companies to introduce new digital technologies.

This paper analyzes those endogenous and exogenous factors that promote or block the process of introducing digital technologies in public corporations. It was found that at the level of public corporations, there are significant resource constraints, which are manifested in the lack of funds for the introduction of digital technologies. Another significant obstacle is the psychological barriers associated with the unwillingness to use digital technologies in the work process.

The generalization of the efficiency indicators of business processes and criteria for factor conditions of digital transformation has made it possible to identify the main components of the system model of digitalization of public corporations. Considering the above, an authentic system model of digitalization of the public corporate sector is proposed. It seems appropriate to use the model to determine the effect of the introduction of digital technologies in the public corporate sector.

Author Biographies

Igor Dunayev, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor

Department of Economic Policy and Management

Educational and Research Institute «Institute of Public Administration»

Aleksander Kud, «Simcord Company» LLC

General Director

Mykola Latynin, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor

Department of Economic Policy and Management

Educational and Research Institute «Institute of Public Administration»

Alisa Kosenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Policy and Management

Educational and Research Institute «Institute of Public Administration»

Victor Kosenko, «Kharkiv Business School» LLC

PhD, Associate Professor, Director

Igor Kobzev, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD

Department of Information Technologies and Control System

Educational and Research Institute «Institute of Public Administration»

References

  1. Strutynska, I., Dmytrotsa, L., Kozbur, H. (2019). The Main Barriers and Drivers of the Digital Transformation of Ukraine Business Structures. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on ICT in Education, Research and Industrial Applications. Integration, Harmonization and Knowledge Transfer, 2387, 50–64.
  2. Strutynska, I., Kozbur, G., Dmytrotsa, L., Sorokivska, O., Melnyk, L. (2019). Influence of Digital Technology on Roadmap Development for Digital Business Transformation. 2019 9th International Conference on Advanced Computer Information Technologies (ACIT). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/acitt.2019.8780056
  3. Saarikko, T., Westergren, U. H., Blomquist, T. (2020). Digital transformation: Five recommendations for the digitally conscious firm. Business Horizons, 63 (6), 825–839. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2020.07.005
  4. Jones, M. D., Hutcheson, S., Camba, J. D. (2021). Past, present, and future barriers to digital transformation in manufacturing: A review. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, 936–948. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2021.03.006
  5. Dillon, S. M., Glavas, C., Mathews, S. (2020). Digitally immersive, international entrepreneurial experiences. International Business Review, 29 (6), 101739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101739
  6. Jafari-Sadeghi, V., Garcia-Perez, A., Candelo, E., Couturier, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of digital transformation on technology entrepreneurship and technological market expansion: The role of technology readiness, exploration and exploitation. Journal of Business Research, 124, 100–111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.11.020
  7. Shakina, E., Parshakov, P., Alsufiev, A. (2021). Rethinking the corporate digital divide: The complementarity of technologies and the demand for digital skills. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120405
  8. Lobschat, L., Mueller, B., Eggers, F., Brandimarte, L., Diefenbach, S., Kroschke, M., Wirtz, J. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility. Journal of Business Research, 122, 875–888. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.006
  9. Kud, A., Mashchenko, M., Pypenko, I., Soboleva, I. (2020). Predicting the Impact of Digital Assets on Socioeconomic Development of an Enterprise. Kharkiv: KRPOCH, 67. doi: https://doi.org/10.26697/9786177089116.2020
  10. Sama, L. M., Stefanidis, A., Casselman, R. M. (2021). Rethinking governance for the digital era: The role of stewardship. Business Horizons. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.08.001
  11. Kud, A. (2021). Decentralized information platforms as a tool of public governance modernization. “Bulletin of Postgraduate Education” (Series «Social and Behavioural Sciences»), 15 (44), 233–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2522-9931-2021-15(44)-233-274
  12. Ispol'zovanie tekhnologii blokcheyn v tselyah ustoychivogo razvitiya: perspektivy i problemy (2021). Ekonomicheskiy i Sotsial'nyy Sovet. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ecn162021d3_ru.pdf
  13. Intersessional panel of the United Nations Commission on science and technology for development (CSTD): Contribution by Latvia to the CSTD 2020-2021 priority theme on “Harnessing blockchain for sustainable development: prospects and challenges” (2020). Geneva, 5. Available at: https://unctad.org/system/files/non-official-document/CSTD_2020-21_c21_B_Latvia_en.pdf
  14. Ukraina 2030E – kraina z rozvynutoiu tsyfrovoiu ekonomikoiu (2019). Available at: https://strategy.uifuture.org/kraina-z-rozvinutoyu-cifrovoyu-ekonomikoyu.html
  15. OECD (2021). OECD Review of the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises in Ukraine. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/corporate/ca/soe-review-ukraine.htm
  16. Public sector achievement in 36 countries (2015). A comparative assessment of inputs, outputs and outcomes. Available at: https://www.eupan.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2016_1_NL_Public_Sector_Achievement_in_36_Countries.pdf
  17. Markevych, K. (2017). Derzhavni VS pryvatni. Visnyk Ofitsiyno pro podatky, 3-4 (6). Available at: http://www.visnuk.com.ua/uk/publication/100005791-derzhavni-vs-privatni-1
  18. Chen, X., Dai, Q., Na, C. (2019). The value of enterprise information systems under different corporate governance aspects. Information Technology and Management, 20 (4), 223–247. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-019-00310-3
  19. Canhoto, A. I., Quinton, S., Pera, R., Molinillo, S., Simkin, L. (2021). Digital strategy aligning in SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 30 (3), 101682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2021.101682
  20. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T., Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28 (1), 52–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2018.02.004
  21. Hrupa Naftohaz zdiysniuie kompleksnu tsyfrovu transformatsiu dlia zabezpechennia prozorosti biznesu ta pidvyshchennia kapitalizatsiyi. Available at: https://news.sap.com/ukraine/2021/02/naftogaz-s4hana/
  22. Stvorennia tsentriv obrobky danykh poblyzu AES zabezpechyt Enerhoatomu postiinoho spozhyvacha elektroenerhiyi. Available at: https://www.atom.gov.ua/ua/press_centr-19/novini_kompanii-20/p/stvorenna_centriv_obrobki_danih_poblizu_aes_zabezpecit_energoatomu_postijnogo_spozivaca_elektroenergii-46004
  23. Obruch, A. (2019). Organizational and resource support digital transformation of railway transport. Intellect XXІ, 6, 138–143. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-8801/2019-6.25
  24. Ukrposhta, Mininfrastruktury ta Mintsyfry uklaly memorandum pro spivpratsiu (2020). Available at: https://www.ukrposhta.ua/ua/news/57204-ukrposhta-mininfrastrukturi-ta-mincifri-uklali-memorandum-pro-spivpracju
  25. Oleshko, T., Popyk, N., Babych, M. (2021). Digitalization of business processes in civil aviation. Ekonomika Ta Derzhava, 4, 43–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2021.4.43
  26. AMPU ta SHIPNEXT stvoriat systemu tsyfrovoho obminu danymy dlia suden ta portiv. Available at: http://www.uspa.gov.ua/ru/pres-tsentr/novini/novini-ampu/17099-ampu-ta-shipnext-stvoryat-sistemu-tsifrovogo-obminu-danimi-dlya-suden-ta-portiv
  27. Kloba, L. H. (2018). Digitization is innovative to the development of banks. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 12. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2018.12.84
  28. Serhiy Naumov: «Bankivska systema – dzerkalo ekonomiky. Pohliad u maibutnie». Available at: https://www.oschadbank.ua/news/sergij-naumov-bankivska-sistema-dzerkalo-ekonomiki-poglad-u-majbutne
  29. Vodianka, L., Yurii, T. (2020). Digitalization and digital platform in the economic development of the agricultural sector. Ekonomika APK, 12, 67–73. doi: https://doi.org/10.32317/2221-1055.202012067
  30. Indeks prozorosti kompaniy Ukrainy. Available at: https://index.cgpa.com.ua/
  31. Erol, I., Ar, I. M., Ozdemir, A. I., Peker, I., Asgary, A., Medeni, I. T., Medeni, T. (2020). Assessing the feasibility of blockchain technology in industries: evidence from Turkey. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34 (3), 746–769. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-09-2019-0309
  32. Enerhetyka Ukrainy: vyklyky ta initsiatyvy (2020). Kyiv. Available at: https://razumkov.energy/meny/research/energetika-ukra%D1%97ni-vikliki-ta-іnіczіativi.html
  33. Sung, C. S., Park, J. Y. (2021). Understanding of blockchain-based identity management system adoption in the public sector. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34 (5), 1481–1505. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-12-2020-0532
  34. Pererva, P., Kuchynskyi, V., Kobielieva, T., Kosenko, A., Maslak, O. (2021). Economic substantiation of outsourcing the information technologies and logistic services in the intellectual and innovative activities of an enterprise. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (13 (112)), 6–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.239164
  35. Model' Dyupona (DuPont). Available at: https://allfi.biz/financialmanagement/FinancialStatementsAnalysys/model-dupont.php
  36. Digital Intensity in US Manufacturing (2017). Siemens. Available at: https://www.supplychain247.com/paper/digital_intensity_in_us_manufacturing/manufacturing
  37. Kaplan, R. S., Norton, D. P. (2016). Sbalansirovannaya sistema pokazateley. Ot strategii k deystviyu. Moscow: Olimp-Biznes, 320.
  38. Caliskan, A., Özkan Özen, Y. D., Ozturkoglu, Y. (2020). Digital transformation of traditional marketing business model in new industry era. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 34 (4), 1252–1273. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/jeim-02-2020-0084
  39. Kaufman, I., Horton, C. (2015). Digital transformation: Leveraging digital technology with core values to achieve sustainable business goals. The European Financial Review, 63–67. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/9964924/Digital_Transformation
  40. Tsyfrova adzhenda Ukrainy – 2020 (2016). Available at: https://ucci.org.ua/uploads/files/58e78ee3c3922.pdf
  41. Proekt Zakonu pro tokenizovani aktyvy ta kryptoaktyvy. No. 4328 vid 05.11.2020. Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Available at: http://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=70353
  42. International roundtable “Virtual assets in the development of national economy”. Available at: https://conf2021.blockchainukraine.org
  43. Kud, A. A. (2021). Formation of public value based on existing platform solutions in the public sector. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 1 (59), 51–67. Available at: http://ap.kh.ua/index.php/apdu/article/view/453/614
  44. Dmytryk, O. O., Kostenko, Y. O., Monaienko, A. O., Riadinska, V. O., Soldatenko, O. V. (2020). State Legal Forms of Interaction with Debt Obligations and State Losses. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11 (2), 342. doi: https://doi.org/10.14505/jarle.v11.2(48).07
  45. Tsyfrova ekonomika: trendy, ryzyky ta sotsialni determinanty (2020). Kyiv, 274.
  46. Dunayev, I., Kud, A. (2020). Developing digital skills and competencies of Ukrainian specialists as a vital need in the global digital transformation era. Pressing Problems of Public Administration, 1 (57), 8–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.34213/ap.20.01.01
  47. Dunayev, I.; Tavidze, A. (Ed.) (2018). The modernization logics and principles of designing a new generation of regional economic policies: findings for recent Ukraine and Eastern-European countries in transition, Modernization: Progress in Economics Research. Vol. 41. New York: NOVA Publ., 53–90.
  48. Ansong, E., Boateng, R. (2019). Surviving in the digital era – business models of digital enterprises in a developing economy. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21 (2), 164–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-08-2018-0046
  49. Bouwman, H., Nikou, S., Molina-Castillo, F. J., de Reuver, M. (2018). The impact of digitalization on business models. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20 (2), 105–124. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-07-2017-0039
  50. Dussart, P., van Oortmerssen, L. A., Albronda, B. (2021). Perspectives on knowledge integration in cross-functional teams in information systems development. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 27 (3/4), 316–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/tpm-11-2020-0096
  51. Marchenko, V. (2017). Efficiency of deployment of resources in the process of mergers and acquisitions of corporations. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, 1 (188), 51–55. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/frvu_2017_1_11
  52. Chernelevschyj, L., Solomchuk, L. (2015). Corporation as a model of effective business. Intelekt XXI, 2, 54–63. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/int_XXI_2015_2_7
  53. Pavlenko, V., Rudchenko, A. (2016). Improvement of efficiency of state property objects management. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, 4, 7–12. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/frvu_2016_4_4
  54. Rudenko, M. (2019). Osoblyvosti formuvannia mekhanizmu tsyfrovizatsiyi upravlinnia v silskohospodarskykh pidpryiemstvakh. Visnyk LNAU: Ekonomika APK, 26, 20–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.31734/economics2019.26.020
  55. Voskoboeva, O., Goloborodko, A. (2019). Classification of information logistic flows of process-system approach of enterprise management in the conditions of digitalization of economic processes. Economy. Management. Business, 4 (30), 47–53, doi: https://doi.org/10.31673/2415-8089.2019.044753
  56. Brechko, O. (2020). Determinants of digital transformation of the national economy. Herald of Ternopil National Economic University, 4, 7–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2020.04.007
  57. Gudz, O. (2018). Digital economy: changing values and guidelines enterprise management. Economy. Management. Business, 2, 4–12. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ecmebi_2018_2_3
  58. Dunayev, I., Latynin, M., Ulyanchenko, Y., Kosenko, A. (2019). Renewing an economic policy for a rising Ukrainian region: smoothing discrete shifts and mastering new competencies. Regional science inquiry, XI (3), 133–150. Available at: http://www.rsijournal.eu/ARTICLES/December_2019/11.pdf
  59. Benington, J., Moore, M. (Eds.) (2011). Public value: theory and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 314.
  60. O’Flynn, J. (2007). From New Public Management to Public Value: Paradigmatic Change and Managerial Implications. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66 (3), 353–366. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2007.00545.x

Downloads

Published

2021-12-28

How to Cite

Dunayev, I., Kud, A., Latynin, M., Kosenko, A., Kosenko, V., & Kobzev, I. (2021). Improving methods for evaluating the results of digitizing public corporations. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13 (114), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.248122

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 13 (114) (2021): Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Igor Dunayev, Aleksander Kud, Mykola Latynin, Alisa Kosenko, Victor Kosenko, Igor Kobzev

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.

A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.