Implementation of reengineering technology to reduce the terms of the technical preparation of manufacturing of aviation technology assemblies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.258550

Keywords:

technical preparation of production, reengineering, assembly unit, analytical standard, aviation technology

Abstract

The object of this study is the technical preparation of manufacturing (TPM) of aviation technology (AT) using reengineering technology. The task to reduce the terms of TPM AT was tackled while solving direct and inverse problems of shape formation involving reengineering. The study is based on the equation for calculating the labor intensity of creating an assembly unit (AU) as a mathematical model for the formation and accumulation of components of the total labor intensity at all stages. The following results are reported: a scheme has been proposed for linking homogeneous components of an article obtained using the loft-template method (LTM) with digital mock-up (DMU) when applying the reengineering method. The scheme summarizes and structures the reengineering technology to solve direct and inverse shape-formation problems and could be used to solve the tasks of prototyping, manufacturing, and refurbishment of tooling, as well as article control at all stages of production. An example of the helicopter stabilizer shows that when solving the direct shape-formation problem, the labor intensity is from 294.94 to 315.06 man-hours, and when solving the inverse problem ‒ from 194.78 to 213.22 man-hours. A comparative analysis of the labor intensity of TPM revealed a difference of 1.5 times in favor of the labor intensity of solving the inverse problem. Comparing the labor intensity of creating DMU for the stabilizer of a helicopter has made it possible to establish that the labor intensity of solving the inverse problem is 3.7 times less than the labor intensity of solving a direct problem. Recommendations for reducing the terms of TPM AT with the use of reengineering are given. The results could be used to assess the labor intensity and timing of TPM AT and mechanical engineering objects in general when using reengineering technology

Author Biographies

Valeriy Sikulskiy, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Kateryna Maiorova, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

PhD, Head of Department

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Iurii Vorobiov, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Maksym Boiko, National Aerospace University “Kharkiv Aviation Institute”

Postgraduate Student

Department of Technology of Aircraft Manufacturing

Oleh Komisarov, Motor Sich JSC

Production Director

References

  1. passenger totals drop 60 percent as COVID-19 assault on international mobility continues. Available at: https://www.icao.int/Newsroom/Pages/2020-passenger-totals-drop-60-percent-as-COVID19-assault-on-international-mobility-continues.aspx
  2. Podrez, N. V., Bozheeva, T. V. (2017). Choosing the method of aircraft equipment linkage in modern production conditions. Modern Technologies. System Analysis. Modeling, 3 (55), 152-158. doi: https://doi.org/10.26731/1813-9108.2017.3(55).152-158
  3. Boyd, K. (2022). Predicting Performance Capabilities and Designing a New Wing for an Unknown Aircraft Using Reverse Engineering Techniques. Ohio State University. Available at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/apexprod/rws_olink/r/1501/10?clear=10&p10_accession_num=osu1618312172848158
  4. Lee, J. J., Yoon, H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex products systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in military aircraft industry. Research Policy, 44 (7), 1296–1313. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.007
  5. ISO 17599:2015. Technical product documentation (TPD) – General requirements of digital mock-up for mechanical products. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/62208.html
  6. Bruni, A., Concettoni, E., Cristalli, C., Nisi, M. (2019). Smart Inspection Tools in robotized aircraft panels manufacturing. 2019 IEEE 5th International Workshop on Metrology for AeroSpace (MetroAeroSpace). doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/metroaerospace.2019.8869690
  7. Frigo, M. A., Silva, E. C. C. da, Barbosa, G. F. (2016). Augmented Reality in Aerospace Manufacturing: A Review. Journal of Industrial and Intelligent Information. doi: https://doi.org/10.18178/jiii.4.2.125-130
  8. Eschen, H., Kötter, T., Rodeck, R., Harnisch, M., Schüppstuhl, T. (2018). Augmented and Virtual Reality for Inspection and Maintenance Processes in the Aviation Industry. Procedia Manufacturing, 19, 156–163. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.022
  9. Shabalkin, D. Yu., Buyandukov, A. S., Luk'yanov, N. A. (2016). Primenenie sistemy virtual'nogo inzhiniringa v konstruktorsko-tekhnologicheskoy podgotovke na aviastroitel'nom predpriyatii. Novye tekhnologii, materialy i oborudovanie rossiyskoy aviakosmicheskoy otrasli AKTO-2016, 287–291.
  10. Streltsov, P. A., Kiselev, E. S. (2016). Improving the efficiency of high-speed milling of non-rigid intricate workpieces by improvement the control program for the machine tools with CNC in CAM-system. Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiyskoy akademii nauk, 18 (1-2), 416–420. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/povyshenie-effektivnosti-vysokoskorostnogo-frezerovaniya-slozhnoprofilnyh-zagotovok-putem-sovershenstvovaniya-upravlyayuschih
  11. Sibagatullina, L. I., Veselovskaya, V. S., Gorodilov, A. B. (2015). Puti sokrascheniya srokov i zatrat podgotovki proizvodstva aviatsionnoy produktsii. XXII Tupolevskie chteniya (shkola molodykh uchenykh): mezhdunarodnaya molodezhnaya nauchnaya konferentsiya. Kazan': Foliant, 382–387.
  12. Anwar, M. Y., Ikramullah, S., Mazhar, F. (2014). Reverse engineering in modeling of aircraft propeller blade - first step to product optimization. IIUM Engineering Journal, 15 (2). doi: https://doi.org/10.31436/iiumej.v15i2.497
  13. Łukaszewicz, A. (2015). Method for Propeller Reconstruction Using Reverse Engineering. Project: CAx systems education and application. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268053431_Method_for_Propeller_Reconstruction_Using_Reverse_Engineering
  14. Maiorova, K., Vorobiov, I., Boiko, M., Suponina, V., Komisarov, O. (2021). Implementation of reengineering technology to ensure the predefined geometric accuracy of a light aircraft keel. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (1 (114)), 6–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.246414
  15. Sikulskyi, V., Sikulskyi, S., Maiorova, K., Suponina, V., Komisarov, O. (2022). The Process of Forming Integral Ribbed Panels by Sequential Local Phased Deformation with Information Support. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 157–165. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94259-5_15
  16. Babenko, A. H., Bondarevska, K. V. (2013). Normuvannia pratsi. Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovska derzhavna finansova akademiiak, 158. Available at: http://xn--e1ajqk.kiev.ua/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Babenko-A.-G.-Normuvannya-praczi.pdf
  17. Kondić, Ž., Tunjić, Đ., Maglić, L., Novak, A. H. (2020). Tolerance Analysis of Mechanical Parts. Tehnički glasnik, 14 (3), 265–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20200504092314
  18. Krivov, G. A., Matvienko, V. A., Vorob'ev, Yu. A. (2007). Tekhnologiya sborki uzlov i agregatov planera samoleta s ispol'zovaniem otverstiy v kachestve sborochnykh baz: SOU MPP 49.035-90:2007. Kiev, 156.
  19. Laha, R. G., Rohatgi, V. K. (2020). Probability theory. Courier Dover Publications, 576. Available at: https://books.google.com.ua/books?hl=en&lr=&id=R97YDwAAQBAJ
  20. Mas, F., Racero, J., Ríos, J., Arista, R., Gómez, A., Olmos, V. (2017). Development based on reverse engineering to manufacture aircraft custom-made parts. International Journal of Mechatronics and Manufacturing Systems, 10 (1), 40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmms.2017.10005293
  21. Dubovska, R., Jambor, J., Majerik, J. (2014). Implementation of CAD/CAM System CATIA V5 in Simulation of CNC Machining Process. Procedia Engineering, 69, 638–645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2014.03.037
  22. Hoque, A. S. M., Halder, P. K., Parvez, M. S., Szecsi, T. (2013). Integrated manufacturing features and Design-for-manufacture guidelines for reducing product cost under CAD/CAM environment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 66 (4), 988–1003. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.08.016

Downloads

Published

2022-06-30

How to Cite

Sikulskiy, V., Maiorova, K., Vorobiov, I., Boiko, M., & Komisarov, O. (2022). Implementation of reengineering technology to reduce the terms of the technical preparation of manufacturing of aviation technology assemblies . Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3(1 (117), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.258550

Issue

Section

Engineering technological systems