Creating a digital space of socially sustainable development for food enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.263540

Keywords:

corporate social responsibility, digitalization of business, digital space of sustainable development, digitalization, area of maturity of the enterprise

Abstract

Under modern conditions, there are new requirements for the formation of relations with consumers, partners, employees, and society.

The possibilities of integrating corporate social responsibility (CSR) tools and economic digitalization processes have been investigated and a new format for evaluating the activities of small and medium-sized businesses related to their level of maturity has been defined.

This study formulates patterns of CSR development, proposes the use of a new concept of "digital space of social sustainable development" (DSSSD), and reports a methodological toolkit devised for determining the level of maturity of the digital space of social sustainable development (DSSSD) of food industry enterprises. The developed methodological support makes it possible to assess CSR by economic, social, and informatization criteria.

The proposed CSR scorecard makes it possible to compare companies and rank them in the coordinate system of corporate social responsibility/digitalization. 17 key indicators have been identified, which are formed into three key groups. Confirmation of the effectiveness of the methodology is the execution of calculations for small and medium-sized businesses in the food industry. According to the results of the calculations, the maturity levels of eight enterprises of the food industry in Ukraine in the DSSSD space were determined.

The analysis made it possible to determine that four enterprises are at the initial level of DSSSD (zone 1 Digital Descriptive), two enterprises are moving to zone 2 (Solutions Analytics Digital), and two enterprises are in a state of transition to zone 3 (Smart CIS) due to increasing the level of digitalization and the formation of an internal CSR system, which indicates their active development. This makes it possible to assert that the technique is effective and can be useful for enterprises around the world. The selected indicators are used at all enterprises of those countries that use the international accounting and reporting system.

Improving the system in the areas of formation of corporate social responsibility and the introduction of digitalization of the enterprise makes it possible to optimize the information systems of enterprises, automate management procedures, and create new communication channels with consumers and beneficiaries. This will contribute to the development of a systemic socio-economic effect of business, care for the needs of people, the development of the social climate at an enterprise, and the emergence of new formats of interaction between business, the state, and society.

Author Biographies

Liubov Lingur, Odessа Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Information Technologies

Olena Martyniuk, Odessa National Medical University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Management

Iryna Ivchenko, Odessа Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economic Cybernetics and Information Technologies

Oleg Ivchenko, IT Company "Lohika"

Team Lead, Senior NET Engineer

References

  1. Apal’kova, V. V. (2015). The concept of the digital economy in the European Union and the prospects of Ukraine. European Journal of Management Issues, 23 (4), 9–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.15421/191502
  2. Chuprina, M., Zhaldak, H. (2020). New trends in the sphere of corporate social responsibility. Efektyvna Ekonomika, 11. doi: https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2020.11.87
  3. Zioło, M., Bąk, I., Filipiak, B. Z., Spoz, A. (2022). In search of a financial model for a sustainable economy. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 28 (4), 920–947. doi: https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.16632
  4. Bocharova, N., Shchepilina, A. (2017). Indicators of the level of corporate social responsibility development at motor transport enterprises. Economics of the transport complex, 30, 85–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.30977/etk.2225-2304.2017.30.0.85
  5. Camilleri, M. A. (2017). Corporate Citizenship and Social Responsibility Policies in the United States of America. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 8 (1), 77–93 doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-05-2016-0023
  6. Jamali, D., Karam, C. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries as an Emerging Field of Study. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20 (1), 32–61. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112
  7. Martyniuk, O., Vitvitskaya, O., Lagodiienko, V., Krupitsa, I. (2019). Formation of an innovative concept of management on the basis of reconstruction of genetic algorithm of management technology. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences (PEN), 7 (2), 487. doi: https://doi.org/10.21533/pen.v7i2.560
  8. Kim, Y., Atukeren, E., Lee, Y. (2022). A New Digital Value Chain Model with PLC in Biopharmaceutical Industry: The Implication for Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8 (2), 63. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8020063
  9. The Framework for Enterprise Architecture: Background, Description and Utility by: John A. Zachman. Available at: https://www.zachman.com/resources/ea-articles-reference/327-the-framework-for-enterprise-architecture-background-description-and-utility-by-john-a-zachman
  10. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26 (3), 276–292. doi: https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276
  11. CNews: IT Trends 2020. Available at: https://www.cnews.ru/reviews/ittrendy2020
  12. The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2013. Available at: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2013/12/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013.pdf
  13. Senkevich, A., Voit, D. (2020). Digital transformation of territorial management systems: directions and prospects of development. Black Sea Economic Studies, 52-2, 81–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.32843/bses.52-35
  14. Lingur, L. (2020). Integrated approaches of csr information system formation for small and medium business enterprises. Economy and Society, 22. doi: https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2020-22-38
  15. Lisica, J. (2019). Exploring the Journey to Digital Excellence in Supply Chain. Gartner. Available at: https://blogs.gartner.com/power-of-the-profession-blog/exploring-journey-digital-excellence-supply-chain/
  16. Pliuta, V. (2012). Porivniannia bahatomirnoho analizu v ekonomichnykh doslidzhenniakh: Metody taksonomiyi i faktornoho analizu. Moscow: Statystyka, 151.
  17. Möller, F., Stachon, M., Azkan, C., Schoormann, T., Otto, B. (2021). Designing business model taxonomies – synthesis and guidance from information systems research. Electronic Markets, 32 (2), 701–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00507-x
  18. Sergiienko, L., Polyak, K., Poverlyak, T., Cherchata, A., Andriushchenkoe, I., Zhyliakova, O. (2020). Application of taxonomic analysis in assessing the level of enterprise development in emergency situations. Management Science Letters, 1329–1340. doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.11.024
  19. Kaczmarczyk, P. (2017). Taxonomic Analysis of Voivodships Development in Terms of ICT Usage in Enterprises. Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, 17 (2), 83–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/foli-2017-0020

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Lingur, L., Martyniuk, O., Ivchenko, I., & Ivchenko, O. (2022). Creating a digital space of socially sustainable development for food enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13(118), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.263540

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology