Analysis of the effect of employee status on construction worker's safety behavior using structural equation model

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.269140

Keywords:

employee status, contractual worker, daily workers, outsourcing worker, permanent workers, safety behaviour, PLS-SEM

Abstract

The construction industry is one of the most at risk to worker safety. The number of work accidents in Indonesia continues to increase so that by 2021 the number of work accidents will reach 234,270 cases. Therefore, in-depth research is needed to maintain the safety of all workers. Recognizing the factors that cause work accidents helps stakeholders take preventive action. It is necessary to increase worker safety behaviour by identifying its factors. Both those that occur in casual workers and permanent workers. Therefore, it is important to see whether employment status affects the safety behaviour of construction workers so that preventive measures can be taken as a form of prevention of work accidents. The research objective was to analyze the status of workers on the safety behaviour of construction workers. Data was collected through a survey method of 300 construction workers in the cities of Surabaya, Malang, and Batu in East Java, Indonesia. The results of the study show that worker status has a positive effect on construction work safety behaviour. This means that the higher the Employee Status will increase the Safety Behavior variable, with a path coefficient of 0.390. Among the indicators that are dominant in measuring the ES Worker Status construct is the Type of Worker, with the highest loading factor of 0.842. Thus, if the management wants to raise the value of the variable Safety Behavior through improving aspects of Employee Status, what need to be evaluated as a top priority is the Employee Type. The results of this study can be used as a reference in setting policies related to worker safety. Project management can determine what strategic steps need to be taken for construction workers with different types of employee statuses. so as to increase worker awareness of a culture of safety behavior.

Author Biographies

Fifi Damayanti, Brawijaya University

Doctoral Student

Department of Civil Engineering

Ludfi Djakfar, Brawijaya University

Professor

Department of Civil Engineering Department

Wisnumurti Wisnumurti, Brawijaya University

Associate Professor

Civil Engineering Department

Agung Murti Nugroho, Brawijaya University

Associate Professor

Department of Civil Engineering Department

References

  1. Probst, T. M., Bettac, E. L., Austin, C. T. (2019). Accident under-reporting in the workplace. Increasing Occupational Health and Safety in Workplaces, 30–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788118095.00009
  2. Audited Financial Report (2019). Indonesian Government's Department of Employment Social Security Administrative.
  3. Aggressive Growth For Sustainable Protection (2019) Indonesian Government's Department of Employment Social Security Administrative.
  4. Martiano, M. R. A., Soekiman, D. A. (2021). The Effect of Occupational Health and Safety, Work Accidents and Skills of Construction Workers on the Quality of Life of Construction Industry Workers in Indonesia. International Journal of Academic Research in Economics and Management Sciences, 10 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarems/v10-i1/8868
  5. Andersen, L. P., Nørdam, L., Joensson, T., Kines, P., Nielsen, K. J. (2017). Social identity, safety climate and self-reported accidents among construction workers. Construction Management and Economics, 36 (1), 22–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2017.1339360
  6. Machfudiyanto, R. A., Latief, Y., Arifuddin, R., Yogiswara, Y. (2017). Identification of Safety Culture Dimensions Based on the Implementation of OSH Management System in Construction Company. Procedia Engineering, 171, 405–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.350
  7. Loosemore, M., Sunindijo, R. Y., Lestari, F., Kusminanti, Y., Widanarko, B. (2019). Comparing the safety climate of the Indonesian and Australian construction industries. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 26 (10), 2206–2222. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-08-2018-0340
  8. Tehrani, V. Z., Rezaifar, O., Gholhaki, M., Khosravi, Y. (2019). Investigating Factors of Safety Culture Assessment in Construction Industry Projects. Civil Engineering Journal, 5 (4), 971–983. doi: https://doi.org/10.28991/cej-2019-03091304
  9. Latief, Y., Machfudiyanto, R. A., Arifuddin, R., Setiawan, R. M. F., Yogiswara, Y. (2017). Study of Evaluation OSH Management System Policy Based On Safety Culture Dimensions in Construction Project. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 877, 012028. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/877/1/012028
  10. Seo, H.-C., Lee, Y.-S., Kim, J.-J., Jee, N.-Y. (2015). Analyzing safety behaviors of temporary construction workers using structural equation modeling. Safety Science, 77, 160–168. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.03.010
  11. Shuang, D., Heng, L., Skitmore, M., Qin, Y. (2019). An experimental study of intrusion behaviors on construction sites: The role of age and gender. Safety Science, 115, 425–434. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.02.035
  12. Nasab, H. S., Ghofranipour, F., Kazemnejad, A., Khavanin, A., Tavakoli, R. (2009). Evaluation of knowledge, attitude and behavior of workers towards occupational health and safety. Iranian Journal of Public Health, 38 (2), 125–129.
  13. Moortel, D., Vanroelen, J. C. (2018). Working conditions – Employment status and job quality, Interface Demography. Available at: https://policycommons.net/artifacts/2216250/working-conditions/2973194/
  14. Meng, X., Chan, A. H. S. (2020). Demographic influences on safety consciousness and safety citizenship behavior of construction workers. Safety Science, 129, 104835. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104835
  15. Scoot, G. E. (2001). The Pshychologi Of Safety Handbook. Lewis Publiher.
  16. Cooper, M. D. (1998). Improving Safety Culture: A Practical Guide. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.
  17. Loosemore, M., Malouf, N. (2019). Safety training and positive safety attitude formation in the Australian construction industry. Safety Science, 113, 233–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.11.029
  18. Heinrich, H. W., Petersen, Dan, Roos, N. (1980). Industrial Accident Prevention. New York: Mc. Graw Hill Book Company, 468.
  19. Soares Júnior, G. G., Satyro, W. C., Bonilla, S. H., Contador, J. C., Barbosa, A. P., Monken, S. F. de P. et al. (2021). Construction 4.0: Industry 4.0 enabling technologies applied to improve workplace safety in construction. Research, Society and Development, 10 (12). doi: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20280
  20. Martis, M. (2013). The Influence Of Employment Status On Job Stress , Affective Commitment And Job Satisfaction : Possible Moderators The Influence Of Employment Status On Job Stress , Affective Commitment And Job Satisfaction : Possible Moderators. Master of Business Administration Human Resource Management track, 73.
  21. Indonesian Government's Law Number 11 of 2020 Job Creation (2020). Indonesian Government.
  22. Sugiyono (2013). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
  23. Engkos, A. K., Riduwan, D. (2007). Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Analisis Jalur. Bandung : Alfabeta. Ardianto, Elvinaro.
  24. Fernandes, S. A. A. R., Nurjannah (2020). Pemodelan Persamaan Struktural (SEM) Pendekatan WarpPLS. Malang: UB Press.
Analysis of the effect of employee status on construction worker's safety behavior using structural equation model

Downloads

Published

2022-12-30

How to Cite

Damayanti, F., Djakfar, L., Wisnumurti, W., & Nugroho, A. M. (2022). Analysis of the effect of employee status on construction worker’s safety behavior using structural equation model. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(10 (120), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.269140