Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system




gender mainstreaming, management maturity, gender maturity of the organization, organizational capacity, gender responsibility


Conceptual approaches to the formation of gender sensitivity of the project and program management system are analyzed according to global gender equality principles in business (Gender Equality Principles, GEP). The organizational and structural specificity of integrating gender components was identified and their relational impact on the level of organizational maturity of project management of companies was highlighted.

The conceptual model of integrating gender components in the architecture of the organizational capacity of companies was offered in the context of the mission, strategic planning; structure and management style; adaptability; partnership and cooperation; role in the sector; provision of services; financial viability and resource mobilization.

Gender maturity assessment model was developed on the platform of the project management maturity model (PMMM). The need to use gender mainstreaming technology to improve organizational maturity, including at the level of “benchmarking” is emphasized. The gender maturity assessment model of organizational processes was developed as a result of integration of two dimensions: organizational capacity (seven system blocks) and gender sensitivity (five principles) of companies. It is noted that the responsibility for centralized coordination of integration of gender mainstreaming in the project and program management is assigned to Gender-responsible Project Management Office (G-PMO).

Cognitive causal model of gender maturity of the project and program management system was proposed based on the principles of gender equality and maturity model of project management. The stages of gender maturity of the project management system were outlined: (“knowledge of gender terminology”, “mastering specific techniques and tools by the project team”, “gender mainstreaming technologies integration into a single project and program management system”, “gender mainstreaming technologies benchmarking”, “achieving more gender-sensitive values of projects and programs”. The proposed assessment tool can be used to measure the gender maturity of both a separate unit, and the organization as a whole.

Author Biographies

Tetiana Fesenko, Luhansk National Agrarian University Аlchevskykh str., 44, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Engineering and Architecture


Galyna Fesenko, O. M. Beketov National University of Urban Economy in Kharkiv Marshala Bazhanova str., 17, Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61002

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of History and Cultural Studies


  1. Fesenko, Т. (2015). Gender Mainstreaming as a Factor of Project Management Maturity. Management of development of complex systems, 23, 5–10. Available at:
  2. CMMI for Development: Version 1.3 (2010). Software Engineering Instityte, 482.
  3. Organizational Project Management Maturity Model (OPM3): Knowledge foundation (2003). Project Management Institute, 195.
  4. Portfolio, programme & project management maturity model (P3M3): Version 1.0 (2006). Office of Government Commerce, 77.
  5. Kerzner, H. (2001). Strategic planning for project management using a project management maturity model. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 256.
  6. Boure, L. (2016). Stakeholder Relationship Management: a maturity model for organisational implementation. New York: Poutladge, 242.
  7. Demir, C., Kocabas, I. (2010). Project Management Maturity Model (PMMM) in educational organizations. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1641–1645. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.379
  8. Pigosso, D. C. A., Rozenfeld, H., McAloone, T. C. (2013). Ecodesign maturity model: a management framework to support ecodesign implementation into manufacturing companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 160–173. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.040
  9. Jia, G., Chen, Y., Xue, X., Chen, J., Cao, J., Tang, K. (2011). Program management organization maturity integrated model for mega construction programs in China. International Journal of Project Management, 29 (7), 834–845. doi: 10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.03.003
  10. Lianying, Z., Jing, H., Xinxing, Z. (2012). The Project Management Maturity Model and Application Based on PRINCE2. Procedia Engineering, 29, 3691–3697. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.554
  11. Domingues, P., Sampaio, P., Arezes, P. M. (2016). Integrated management systems assessment: a maturity model proposal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 124, 164–174. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.103
  12. Libby, J., Wynhoven, U., Mills, L., Gula, L. (2011). The women’s empowerment principles – equality means business. UN Women and the UN Global Compact, 16.
  13. Miller, K. (2011). Organizational communication: approaches and processes. Cengage Learning, 336.
  14. Ferguson, K. E. (1984). The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 304.
  15. Gonjukova, L. V., Fesenko, G. G. (2015). Gendermejnstriming v organizacii'. Genderna polityka mist: istorija i suchasnist', 5, 40–42. Available at:
  16. Gender Equality Principles. Available at:
  17. Fesenko, T. G. (2009). Modeli i metody organizacii' ofisu upravlinnja budivel'nymy proektamy. Kharkiv: HDTUBA, 23.
  18. Fesenko, T. G. (2012). Upravlinnja proektamy: teorija ta praktyka vykonannja proektnyh dij. Kharkiv: HNAMG, 182. Available at:Управл%20проект%20Фесенко%20ТГ.pdf
  19. Fesenko, T. G. (2016). Gendernyj ofis v informacijno-komunikatyvnij platformi organiv miscevogo samovrjaduvannja. Informacijni tehnologii' ta vzajemodii'. Kyiv: VPC «Kyivskyj universytet», 111–112.




How to Cite

Fesenko, T., & Fesenko, G. (2017). Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(3 (85), 46–55.



Control processes