Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities




smart city, public participation, post-war reconstruction, digitalization, digital platform, blockchain, tokenization


The object of research is the concept of a smart city. The study considered the problem of interaction between local authorities and citizens in a smart city based on a platform approach. It was determined that the human-centric concept of a smart city involves representing the functions of the city government in the form of specific public services, the purpose of which is to satisfy the needs of citizens. Public participation and active citizenship are recognized as a key component of smart city development. The mechanisms of public participation in the smart city include information, consultations, discussions, public control of finances and joint funds. Multiple digital communication channels, including social networks, instant messengers, websites, e-mail, and various platforms for citizen appeals, could be used simultaneously to communicate through these mechanisms. This leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of interaction. As a result, information related to active public participation on official city websites is fragmented and often out of date. The scalable digital platform serves as a single environment for the exchange of information and resources between citizens and authorities and helps reduce the time and resources spent on organizing such communications. An example of the development of a digital service on the blockchain is given, implemented in the Bitbon decentralized information platform of Ukrainian origin. The practical application consists in ensuring broad citizen participation in filling funds and monitoring their financial transparency. The results of the implementation of platforms for the development of smart cities are organizing open data, encouraging stakeholders to participate in city management, developing innovative creativity and open dialog

Author Biographies

Igor Dunayev, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Science in Public Administration, Professor

Department of Economic Policy and Management

Educational and Research Institute “Institute of Public Administration”

Nataliia Gavkalova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Public Administration and Economic Policy

Aleksander Kud, Simcord LLC; Research Center of Economic and Legal Solutions in the Area of Application of Distributed Ledger Technologies

General Director

A Board Member of the NGO


  1. Brzeziński, Ł., Wyrwicka, M. K. (2022). Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland. Energies, 15 (21), 8213. doi:
  2. Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I., Bolívar, M. P. R. (2019). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39 (4), 592–626. doi:
  3. Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 8 (1), 19–34. doi:
  4. Goodman, N., Zwick, A., Spicer, Z., Carlsen, N. (2020). Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada’s Smart City Challenge. Canadian Geographer, 64 (3), 416–432. doi:
  5. Barns, S. (2018). Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Culture and Society, 12, 5–12. doi:
  6. Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (3), 101284. doi:
  7. Chang, I.-C. C., Jou, S.-C., Chung, M.-K. (2020). Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition. Urban Studies, 58 (3), 559–580. doi:
  8. Chantry, W. (2022). ‘Built from the internet up’: assessing citizen participation in smart city planning through the case study of Quayside, Toronto. GeoJournal, 88 (2), 1619–1637. doi:
  9. Mathotaarachchi, K. P., Thilakarathna, K. A. A. N. (2021). The Social Structure of the City: A Critical Review of Contributing Sociologists. Current Urban Studies, 09 (02), 181–195. doi:
  10. Węziak-Białowolska, D. (2016). Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, 87–96. doi:
  11. Huete-Alcocer, N., López-Ruiz, V.-R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., Nevado-Peña, D. (2022). European Citizens’ Happiness: Key Factors and the Mediating Effect of Quality of Life, a PLS Approach. Mathematics, 10 (3), 367. doi:
  12. Moura, F., de Abreu e Silva, J. (2019). Smart Cities: Definitions, Evolution of the Concept and Examples of Initiatives. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1–9. doi:
  13. Sharifi, A., Salehi, P. (Eds.) (2022). Resilient Smart Cities. The Urban Book Series. doi:
  14. ISO 37101:2016 (2016). Sustainable development in communities – Management system for sustainable development – Requirements with guidance for use. Available at:
  15. Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4), 370–396. doi:
  16. Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224. doi:
  17. Dunayev, I. (2017). Moving Regional Economic Policy Modernization Ahead: Systems Basis for Organizational and Deblocking Mechanisms in Present-day Ukraine. Regional Science Inquiry, 9 (1), 21–39. Available at:
  18. IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation (2018). IAP2 International Federation. Available at:
  19. Dunayev, I., Byelova, L., Kud, A., Rodchenko, V. (2023). Implementing the “government as a platform” concept: the assessment method and an optimal human-centered structure to address technological challenges. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (122)), 6–16. doi:
  20. Dunayev, I., Petrovska, I., Safronova, O., Darovanets, O., Darovanets, K., Mital, О., Nosyriev, O. (2022). Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of smart cities under the conditions of digitalization of city governance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (13 (117)), 6–16. doi:
  21. Dunaiev, I. V., Kovalenko, M. M. (2022). Novi traiektoriyi rehuliuvannia informatsiynykh platform i platformnoi ekonomiky zarady suspilnoho blaha. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 6–24. doi:
  22. Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84 (1), 1–13. doi:
  23. Timonina, M. (Ed.) (2022). Chyselnist naiavnoho naselennia Ukrainy na 1 sichnia 2022 roku. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy.
  24. Kud, A. (2021). Decentralized information platforms as a tool of public governance modernization. “Bulletin of Postgraduate Education” (Series «Social and Behavioural Sciences»), 44, 233–274. doi:
  25. Sokolik, L. O. (2022). Vykorystannia crowd-tekhnolohiy u systemi vriaduvannia v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 38–56.
  26. Dziundziuk, V. B., Dziundziuk, B. V. (2022). Publichne upravlinnia za dopomohoiu blokchein-tekhnolohiyi ta platform: novi mozhlyvosti. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 104–115.
Designing a platform-based model for of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities




How to Cite

Dunayev, I., Gavkalova, N., & Kud, A. (2023). Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13 (124), 46–56.



Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology