Designing a platform-based model of civic participation within the smart-city concept for post-war Ukrainian cities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.285448Keywords:
smart city, public participation, post-war reconstruction, digitalization, digital platform, blockchain, tokenizationAbstract
The object of research is the concept of a smart city. The study considered the problem of interaction between local authorities and citizens in a smart city based on a platform approach. It was determined that the human-centric concept of a smart city involves representing the functions of the city government in the form of specific public services, the purpose of which is to satisfy the needs of citizens. Public participation and active citizenship are recognized as a key component of smart city development. The mechanisms of public participation in the smart city include information, consultations, discussions, public control of finances and joint funds. Multiple digital communication channels, including social networks, instant messengers, websites, e-mail, and various platforms for citizen appeals, could be used simultaneously to communicate through these mechanisms. This leads to a decrease in the effectiveness of interaction. As a result, information related to active public participation on official city websites is fragmented and often out of date. The scalable digital platform serves as a single environment for the exchange of information and resources between citizens and authorities and helps reduce the time and resources spent on organizing such communications. An example of the development of a digital service on the blockchain is given, implemented in the Bitbon decentralized information platform of Ukrainian origin. The practical application consists in ensuring broad citizen participation in filling funds and monitoring their financial transparency. The results of the implementation of platforms for the development of smart cities are organizing open data, encouraging stakeholders to participate in city management, developing innovative creativity and open dialog
References
- Brzeziński, Ł., Wyrwicka, M. K. (2022). Fundamental Directions of the Development of the Smart Cities Concept and Solutions in Poland. Energies, 15 (21), 8213. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15218213
- Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I., Bolívar, M. P. R. (2019). Analyzing Citizen Participation and Engagement in European Smart Cities. Social Science Computer Review, 39 (4), 592–626. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319877478
- Gil, O., Cortés-Cediel, M. E., Cantador, I. (2019). Citizen Participation and the Rise of Digital Media Platforms in Smart Governance and Smart Cities. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 8 (1), 19–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.2019010102
- Goodman, N., Zwick, A., Spicer, Z., Carlsen, N. (2020). Public engagement in smart city development: Lessons from communities in Canada’s Smart City Challenge. Canadian Geographer, 64 (3), 416–432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12607
- Barns, S. (2018). Smart cities and urban data platforms: Designing interfaces for smart governance. City, Culture and Society, 12, 5–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2017.09.006
- Matheus, R., Janssen, M., Maheshwari, D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly, 37 (3), 101284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.01.006
- Chang, I.-C. C., Jou, S.-C., Chung, M.-K. (2020). Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition. Urban Studies, 58 (3), 559–580. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020947908
- Chantry, W. (2022). ‘Built from the internet up’: assessing citizen participation in smart city planning through the case study of Quayside, Toronto. GeoJournal, 88 (2), 1619–1637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-022-10688-3
- Mathotaarachchi, K. P., Thilakarathna, K. A. A. N. (2021). The Social Structure of the City: A Critical Review of Contributing Sociologists. Current Urban Studies, 09 (02), 181–195. doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2021.92011
- Węziak-Białowolska, D. (2016). Quality of life in cities – Empirical evidence in comparative European perspective. Cities, 58, 87–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.016
- Huete-Alcocer, N., López-Ruiz, V.-R., Alfaro-Navarro, J. L., Nevado-Peña, D. (2022). European Citizens’ Happiness: Key Factors and the Mediating Effect of Quality of Life, a PLS Approach. Mathematics, 10 (3), 367. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math10030367
- Moura, F., de Abreu e Silva, J. (2019). Smart Cities: Definitions, Evolution of the Concept and Examples of Initiatives. Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, 1–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71059-4_6-1
- Sharifi, A., Salehi, P. (Eds.) (2022). Resilient Smart Cities. The Urban Book Series. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95037-8
- ISO 37101:2016 (2016). Sustainable development in communities – Management system for sustainable development – Requirements with guidance for use. Available at: https://www.iso.org/standard/61885.html
- Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50 (4), 370–396. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
- Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35 (4), 216–224. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
- Dunayev, I. (2017). Moving Regional Economic Policy Modernization Ahead: Systems Basis for Organizational and Deblocking Mechanisms in Present-day Ukraine. Regional Science Inquiry, 9 (1), 21–39. Available at: https://ideas.repec.org/a/hrs/journl/vixy2017i1p21-39.html
- IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation (2018). IAP2 International Federation. Available at: https://iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2018_IAP2_Spectrum.pdf
- Dunayev, I., Byelova, L., Kud, A., Rodchenko, V. (2023). Implementing the “government as a platform” concept: the assessment method and an optimal human-centered structure to address technological challenges. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (13 (122)), 6–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.275613
- Dunayev, I., Petrovska, I., Safronova, O., Darovanets, O., Darovanets, K., Mital, О., Nosyriev, O. (2022). Development of methods for evaluating the effectiveness of smart cities under the conditions of digitalization of city governance. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (13 (117)), 6–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.260304
- Dunaiev, I. V., Kovalenko, M. M. (2022). Novi traiektoriyi rehuliuvannia informatsiynykh platform i platformnoi ekonomiky zarady suspilnoho blaha. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 6–24. doi: https://doi.org/10.26565/1684-8489-2022-2-01
- Cardullo, P., Kitchin, R. (2018). Being a ‘citizen’ in the smart city: up and down the scaffold of smart citizen participation in Dublin, Ireland. GeoJournal, 84 (1), 1–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-018-9845-8
- Timonina, M. (Ed.) (2022). Chyselnist naiavnoho naselennia Ukrainy na 1 sichnia 2022 roku. Statystychnyi zbirnyk. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy.
- Kud, A. (2021). Decentralized information platforms as a tool of public governance modernization. “Bulletin of Postgraduate Education” (Series «Social and Behavioural Sciences»), 44, 233–274. doi: https://doi.org/10.32405/2522-9931-2021-15(44)-233-274
- Sokolik, L. O. (2022). Vykorystannia crowd-tekhnolohiy u systemi vriaduvannia v umovakh voiennoho stanu. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 38–56.
- Dziundziuk, V. B., Dziundziuk, B. V. (2022). Publichne upravlinnia za dopomohoiu blokchein-tekhnolohiyi ta platform: novi mozhlyvosti. Actual problems of public administration, 2 (61), 104–115.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Igor Dunayev, Nataliia Gavkalova, Aleksander Kud
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.