Improving the scientific and methodological apparatus for determining the optimum strategy when selecting a grouping element for performing the task

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289100

Keywords:

optimal strategy, Wald criterion, Hurwitz criterion, Savage criterion, combat tasks

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of determining the optimal strategy for choosing a certain element of the grouping to perform a certain task.

The problem solved was the contradiction between the need to take into account various types of adverse conditions when determining the optimal strategy for assigning a certain type of forces and means for a certain task to the existing approach to maximizing the result.

The improved scientific and methodical apparatus includes optimal selection criteria and an improved procedure for optimal selection of a certain grouping element.

Existing approaches to the selection of optimal strategies for assigning forces and means to perform tasks were analyzed, in particular the criteria of Wald, Hurwitz, and Savage.

The peculiarity of this analysis is the examination of the criteria in view of the types of adverse conditions they take into account. The application of these criteria will make it possible to take into account the conditions of uncertainty of the input data and minimize the influence of adverse conditions during distribution.

The field of practical use of the analysis results is management processes during preparation for the operation.

A procedure of optimal selection of a certain element of the grouping for the performance of a certain task has been improved by using several criteria for choosing the optimal strategy and harmonizing the results of this selection in accordance with the conditions. The proposed procedure guarantees the performance of tasks, and the increase in the value of the objective function can reach 40 %.

A feature of the proposed procedure is that the result of choosing the optimal strategy is determined according to the conditions of a certain operation and takes into account various types of adverse conditions. This makes it possible to take into account the factors that significantly affect the uncertainty and minimize the expenditure of resources when performing a certain set of combat tasks.

The scope of practical use of the methodology is the process of planning and allocation of forces and means among tasks in the operation.

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Maistrenko, National Defence University of Ukraine

Doctor of Military Sciences, Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

Vitalii Khoma, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Scientific and Methodological Center

Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

Volodymyr Kurban, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Senior Researcher, Deputy Head of Scientific and Methodological Center

Scientific and Methodological Center of Scientific, Scientific and Technical Activities Organization

Andrii Savelіev, National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor

Deputy Head of the Command and Staff Institute

Andrii Shcherba, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artillery Reconnaissance Systems and Instruments

Oleksandr Karavanov, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artillery Reconnaissance Systems and Instruments

Oleksandr Sivak, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Senior Researcher

Science Research Laboratory (Software and Mathematical Support for the Automation Control of Missile Forces and Artillery Weapons Systems)

Oleksii Kaliaiev, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Senior Lecturer

Department of Missile Forces and Artillery

Vitaly Isenko, Research Center of Missile Troops and Artillery

Senior Researcher

Scientific and Research Department (Scientific Support of Firing and Control of Artillery Fire and Missile Strikes)

Yurii Kosovtsov, Scientific Center of the Ground Forces

PhD, Senior Researcher

References

  1. McEneaney, W. M., Oran, A., Cavender, A. (2008). Value-based control of the observation-decision process. 2008 American Control Conference. doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/acc.2008.4587293
  2. Llopis Sanchez, S., Klerx, J., González Pedrós, V., Mak, K., Pilles, H. C. (2021). An Insight into Multi-domain Command and Control Systems: Issues and Challenges. Digital Transformation, Cyber Security and Resilience of Modern Societies, 3–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65722-2_1
  3. Zhang, Y., Bao, W. (2019). The Optimization Method of Command and Control Process Based on Petri Nets. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mechatronics and Robotics Engineering. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3314493.3318456
  4. Gruszczak, A., Kaempf, S. (2023). Routledge Handbook of the Future of Warfare. Routledge, 490. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003299011
  5. Paschall, J., Dawes, J. (2022). Physical Demands of Air Force Special Operations Command Flight Crews: A Needs Analysis and Proposed Testing Protocol. Strength & Conditioning Journal, 45 (3), 354–363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1519/ssc.0000000000000746
  6. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Shcherba, A., Olshevskyi, Y., Pereverzin, Y., Popkov, O. et al. (2022). Improving a procedure for determining the factors that influence the need of higher education institutions for specialists of the highest qualification. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (115)), 86–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.251027
  7. Hill, L. H., Rose, A. D. (2023). Assessment, Evaluation, and Accountability in Adult Education. Routledge, 278. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003443117
  8. Hryb, D. A., Lukianchuk, V. V., Nikolaiev, I. M. (2016). Osnovni problemy i napriamy rozvytku zenitnoho raketnoho ozbroiennia na tryvalu perspektyvu. Ozbroiennia ta viiskova tekhnika, 1 (9), 37–40. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ovt_2016_1_8
  9. Henov, B., Lukianchuk, V., Nikolaev, I. (2021). Priority development of the technological basis – the basis for the development of anti-aircraft missile weapons in Ukraine. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 2 (43), 80–86. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.43.11
  10. Li, T., Wang, G., Guo, X., Zhao, M., Liu, J., Du, C. (2023). Evaluation and Optimization of a Command and Control System Based on Complex Networks Theory. Electronics, 12 (5), 1180. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12051180
  11. Ismail, M. S. (2020). One for All, All for One---Von Neumann, Wald, Rawls, and Pareto. Proceedings of the 21st ACM Conference on Economics and Computation. doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3391403.3399460
  12. Sabino, E. R., Rêgo, L. C. (2023). Optimism pessimism stability in the graph model for conflict resolution for multilateral conflicts. European Journal of Operational Research, 309 (2), 671–682. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2023.01.038
  13. Fedushko, S., Molodetska, K., Syerov, Y. (2023). Decision-making approaches in the antagonistic digital communication of the online communities users. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 13 (1). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-022-01021-4
  14. Huzchenko, S., Poplavets, S., Drol, O., Luk‘yanov, S., Kushpeta, R., Titov, O. (2022). Vyznachennia rozpodilu boiovykh zasobiv mizh pidrozdilamy u bahatoetapnykh boiovykh diyakh. Scientific Collection «InterConf», 136, 419–427. Available at: https://archive.interconf.center/index.php/conference-proceeding/article/view/1964
  15. Leontiev, O., Naumenko, M. (2021). Solution methodical approach to mathematical problems synthesis of rational development programs of arms tactical aircraft based on criteria achieve the highest possible level of combat building in terms limited resources. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 1 (42), 50–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.42.06
  16. Golovanov, A., Skorodid, S. (2019). Justification of the evaluation indicator of options for distribution of forces and means by directions in the streak defense. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl, 2, 16–21. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ZKhUPS_2019_2_4
  17. Morozov, A. A. (2015). The task of synthesis strategies expander repair organs of groupings of troops (forces). Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Kharkivskoho universytetu Povitrianykh Syl, 1 (42), 61–63. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/ZKhUPS_2015_1_16
  18. Sikirda, Y., Shmelova, T., Kasatkin, M., Trigub, Y. (2020). Optimization of the strategies of collaborative decision making by operators of the air navigation system in the conflict situations. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 4 (41), 86–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2020.41.10
  19. Semenenko, O., Lipskyi, A., Hetman, A., Reznik, V., Herasymenko, O., Tarasov, R. (2023). The main theoretical aspects of determining the criteria of military and economic efficiency in the tasks of justifying the choice of rational options for complex types of weapons and military equipment. Social Development and Security, 13 (2), 171–184. doi: https://doi.org/10.33445/sds.2023.13.2.15
  20. Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Lykholot, O., Shcherba, A., Yakubovskyi, O., Stetsiv, S. et al. (2021). Devising a procedure for justifying the need for samples of weapons and weapon target assignment when using a reconnaissance firing system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (113)), 65–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.241616
  21. Kateshchenok А., Neklonskyi, I. (2017). Evaluation of the efficiency of the interaction between the nomocracy protection organization during the coverage of important objects against the subversive actions of enemy forces. Zbirnyk naukovykh prats Natsionalnoi akademiyi Derzhavnoi prykordonnoi sluzhby Ukrainy, 3 (73), 69–81. Available at: http://repositsc.nuczu.edu.ua/handle/123456789/6791
  22. Kamak, Y., Nesterenko, S., Rudnichenko, S., Chygryn, R. (2021). Application of probable networks of confidence for multi-criterional assessment of quality indicators of weapons and military equipment. Scientific Works of Kharkiv National Air Force University, 3 (69), 55–63. doi: https://doi.org/10.30748/zhups.2021.69.07
  23. Almudevar, A. (2021). Theory of Statistical Inference. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 469. doi: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003049340
  24. Lakhno, V., Husiev, B., Smolii, V., Blozva, A., Kasatkin, D., Osypova, T. (2021). Methods of system analysis in the formation of information security policy on transport. Cybersecurity: Education, Science, Technique, 4 (12), 51–60. doi: https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2021.12.5160
  25. Ivchenko, I., Chugunov, A., Semenov, A. (2020). Analysis of economic and mathematical models of portfolio management in the activity of it enterprise. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu, 1 (4), 113–117. Available at: http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/VKNU-ES-2020-N-4-T1-284.pdf#page=113
  26. Ho, E., Rajagopalan, A., Skvortsov, A., Arulampalam, S., Piraveenan, M. (2022). Game Theory in Defence Applications: A Review. Sensors, 22 (3), 1032. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031032
  27. Piraveenan, M. (2019). Applications of Game Theory in Project Management: A Structured Review and Analysis. Mathematics, 7 (9), 858. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/math7090858
  28. Maistrenko, O., Stetsiv, S., Savelіev, A., Petushkov, V., Kornienko, A., Pechorin, O. et al. (2023). Improving the scientific methodological approach to determining the appropriate type of reservation of a reconnaissance fire system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2 (3 (122)), 6–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.276171
  29. Önkal, D., Gönül, M. S., Goodwin, P. (2023). Supporting Judgment in Predictive Analytics: Scenarios and Judgmental Forecasts. Judgment in Predictive Analytics, 245–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30085-1_9
Improving the scientific and methodological apparatus for determining the optimum strategy when selecting a grouping element for performing the task

Downloads

Published

2023-10-31

How to Cite

Maistrenko, O., Khoma, V., Kurban, V., Savelіev A., Shcherba, A., Karavanov, O., Sivak, O., Kaliaiev, O., Isenko, V., & Kosovtsov, Y. (2023). Improving the scientific and methodological apparatus for determining the optimum strategy when selecting a grouping element for performing the task. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(3 (125), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289100

Issue

Section

Control processes