Development of a technological innovation and social entrepreneurship training program to generate services in a Mexican public entity

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289753

Keywords:

entrepreneurship, education, training, knowledge, SMEs, social entrepreneurship, economic activities, talent

Abstract

Technology is driving innovation in social entrepreneurship, where access to information, education, mobile connectivity, artificial intelligence (AI), and cryptocurrencies have made it possible to modify the social impact. Our research focuses on the formation, integration, and execution of ideal training programs that contribute to positive results in economic axes defined in terms of Technological Innovation, Social Entrepreneurship, Innovative Solutions for Social Challenges, efficiency, scalability, and financial sustainability. This research needs to solve the problem of developing a training program in technological innovation and social entrepreneurship because currently, these programs face several problems partially solved in the literature; these problems are mostly: lack of alignment with organizational objectives, lack of relevance and applicability, deficiencies in program design, lack of top management support, and inadequate performance evaluation. Technological innovation and social entrepreneurship in vocational training are implemented as processes that introduce new technologies, methodologies, and approaches to improve the learning and performance of an organization's workers. In this research, measures and metrics were implemented that allowed various aspects to evaluate and improve the performance of the training program, metrics were implemented that made it possible to assess multiple aspects and enhance the performance of the training programs. Our research axes show that quantitative feedback surveys established our performance indicators were conducted to evaluate the relevance and applicability of the program. Due to their characteristics, the results obtained in this research allows to solve this problem and empower the participating people and organizations to create social and environmental impact; they also allowed to increase productivity and define more efficient processes. For this reason, this research work identified the factors that intervene in using training programs within a public entity by collecting qualitative and quantitative data

Supporting Agency

  • We appreciate the facilities granted to carry out this work to the Instituto Politécnico Nacional through the Secretariat of Research and Postgraduate with the SIP: 20220233, 20220556, and 20221302 projects. Furthermore, to the Interdisciplinary Unit of Engineering and Social and Administrative Sciences, Center for Technological Innovation and Development in Computing and Digital Technologies Research and Development Center. Likewise, the Program of Stimulus to the Researchers' Performance (EDI) and the Program of Stimulus COFAA, PEDD, CONACYT.

Author Biographies

Raúl Junior Sandoval-Gómez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

PhD Public relations

Section of Postgraduate Studies and Research of the Interdisciplinary Professional Unit of Social and Administrative Sciences of the IPN

Jesús Antonio Álvarez-Cedillo, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

PhD Education

Section of Postgraduate Studies and Research of the Interdisciplinary Professional Unit of Social and Administrative Sciences of the IPN

Edgar Ivan Castellanos-Sanchez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Student of Management Master Degree

Section of Postgraduate Studies and Research of the Interdisciplinary Professional Unit of Social and Administrative Sciences of the IPN

Teodoro Álvarez-Sánchez, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

PhD

Informatic Sciences Section of Postgraduate Studies

Section of Postgraduate Studies and Research of the CITEDI

Rebeca Perez-Garcia, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Student of Management Master Degree

Section of Postgraduate Studies and Research of the Interdisciplinary Professional Unit of Social and Administrative Sciences of the IPN

References

  1. Barrientos, E., Reilly, A. H. (2016). Unpacking “Give Back Box:”: A Social Enterprise at the Intersection of Leadership, Innovation, and Sustainability. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 11 (1), 48–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242016000100007
  2. Alshanty, A. M., Emeagwali, O. L. (2019). Market-sensing capability, knowledge creation and innovation: The moderating role of entrepreneurial-orientation. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 4 (3), 171–178. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.02.002
  3. Kim, M. G., Lee, J.-H., Roh, T., Son, H. (2020). Social Entrepreneurship Education as an Innovation Hub for Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem: The Case of the KAIST Social Entrepreneurship MBA Program. Sustainability, 12 (22), 9736. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229736
  4. Billorou, N. (2011). Competencias para empresarios de las MIPYME en América Latina. Estudio regional. Available at: https://www.oitcinterfor.org/node/6010
  5. Thompson Heames, J., Harvey, M. (2006). The Evolution of the Concept of the “Executive” from the 20th Century Manager to the 21st Century Global Leader. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13 (2), 29–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130020301
  6. Ley Federal del Trabajo. 1° de abril de 1970. Available at: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lft.htm
  7. Ley Federal de los Trabajadores al Servicio del Estado, Reglamentaria del Apartado B) del Artículo 123 Constitucional. 28 de diciembre de 1963. Available at: https://www.diputados.gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/lftse.htm
  8. Del Estado, L. F. de R. P. (2023). Ley Federal de Responsabilidad Patrimonial del Estado. Revista Del Posgrado En Derecho de La UNAM, 17, 299. doi: https://doi.org/10.22201/ppd.26831783e.2022.17.365
  9. Eichenauer, C. J., Ryan, A. M., Alanis, J. M. (2021). Leadership During Crisis: An Examination of Supervisory Leadership Behavior and Gender During COVID-19. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 29 (2), 190–207. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/15480518211010761
  10. González, M. G., Rodríguez, A. G., Cárdenas, T. O. (2021). Análisis desde la evaluación de impacto en la capacitación a directivos. Avances, 23 (3). Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=637869395002
  11. Hidalgo-Parra, Y., Hernández-Hechavarría, Y., Leyva-Reyes, N. (2020). Indicadores para evaluar el impacto de la capacitación en el trabajo. Ciencias Holguín, 26 (1), 74–83. Available at: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=181562407006
  12. Covarrubias Hernández, L. Y. (2021). Educación a distancia: transformación de los aprendizajes. Telos Revista de Estudios Interdisciplinarios En Ciencias Sociales, 23 (1), 150–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.36390/telos231.12
  13. Rodríguez Arce, J., Juárez Pegueros, J. P. C. (2017). Impacto del m-learning en el proceso de aprendizaje: habilidades y conocimiento / The Impact Of m-learning On The Learning Process: Skills and Knowledge. RIDE Revista Iberoamericana Para La Investigación y El Desarrollo Educativo, 8 (15), 363–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.23913/ride.v8i15.303
  14. Helmich, D. L., Erzen, P. E. (1975). Leadership Style and Leader Needs. Academy of Management Journal, 18 (2), 397–402. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/255544
  15. Billsberry, J., Rollag, K. (2010). New Technological Advances Applied to Management Education. Journal of Management Education, 34 (1), 186–188. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562909359399
  16. Helic, D. (2006). Technology-supported management of collaborative learning processes. International Journal of Learning and Change, 1 (3), 285. doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/ijlc.2006.010971
  17. On-site training and certification of US reactor inspectors (1991). NDT & E International, 24 (2), 115–116. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0963-8695(91)90960-b
  18. Way, A. (2021). From MT to LREV: managing the transition. Machine Translation, 35 (4), 447–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10590-021-09286-w
  19. Kоsova, Т., Smerichevskyi, S., Antypenko, N., Mykhalchenko, O., Raicheva, L. (2023). Innovative and financial modernization of transportation system based on international technology transfer. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (13 (125)), 47–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289101
  20. Davydiuk, O., Ostapenko, I., Shekhovtsov, V., Sukhodubova, I., Senyk, Y. (2023). Identifying directions for improving means of technology transfer safety regulation. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (13 (125)), 88–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.290116
  21. Mammadova, M., Jabrayilova, Z., Shikhaliyeva, N. (2023). Development of decision-making technique based on sentiment analysis of crowdsourcing data in medical social media resources. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (125)), 75–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289989
  22. Ashenfelter, O. (1978). Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60 (1), 47. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1924332
  23. Technology Training (2023). Changing Seasons, 75–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2x1nrvn.9
Development of a technological innovation and social entrepreneurship training program to generate services in a Mexican public entity

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Sandoval-Gómez, R. J., Álvarez-Cedillo, J. A., Castellanos-Sanchez, E. I., Álvarez-Sánchez, T., & Perez-Garcia, R. (2023). Development of a technological innovation and social entrepreneurship training program to generate services in a Mexican public entity. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13 (126), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289753

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology