Formation of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of enterprise development transparency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.292324Keywords:
economic freedom, entrepreneurial culture, strategic dominants, transparency, economic developmentAbstract
Under today's unstable market conditions of business, one of the urgent problems has become the study of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of the transparency of the development of enterprises. This is due to the need to ensure the efficiency of activities and strengthen the competitiveness of Ukrainian enterprises in the European market. This defines economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as the most priority criteria for the transparency of enterprise development by vector and rank direction. The relationship between economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of the transparency of enterprise development was substantiated. The set of structural and logical subsystems of transparency of development, which are interconnected and functioning, taking into account the specifics of their impact on the strategic and analytical support of enterprises, has been studied. The variability of the strategic dominant influence of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture on the transparency of the development of enterprises was formed using the hierarchy analysis method. The obtained variability allows taking into account the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the degree of influence of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture on the general level of transparency of the development of enterprises, which is the basis for the development of strategically oriented areas of their activity
References
- Ekonomika znan: vyklyky hlobalizatsiyi ta Ukraina (2004). Kyiv: Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen, 268.
- Agrawal, R., Wankhede, V. A., Kumar, A., Upadhyay, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). Nexus of circular economy and sustainable business performance in the era of digitalization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71 (3), 748–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2020-0676
- Bezuhla, J., Kononenko, Ya., Bytiak, O., Zaitseva, A., Zacharchyn, H., Korin, M. (2021). Renovation and sustainable development of the industrial energy enterprise: economic and legal management mechanism. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628 (1), 012009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012009
- Bhattacharya, A. (2021). Achieving sustainability in supply chain operations in the interplay between circular economy and Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 34 (10), 867–869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1981032
- Charan, R., Carey, D., Barton, D. (2019). Talent wins: on a new approach to realizing HR potential. Moscow: Olymp-business, 224.
- Daisley, B. (2020). New rules of work. Generator of productive peace. Moscow: Bombora, 368.
- Desruelle, P., Nepelski, D. (2017). The “Innovation Radar”: A New Policy Tool to Support Innovation Management. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944104
- Forsman, H. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40 (5), 739–750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003
- Horng, J.-S., Chou, S.-F., Liu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-Y. (2013). Creativity, aesthetics and eco-friendliness: A physical dining environment design synthetic assessment model of innovative restaurants. Tourism Management, 36, 15–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.002
- Khabibullin, R. I. (2018). Modern trends in the development of cooperation. Science and education issues, 14 (26).
- Khabibullin, R. I., Kleiner, G. B., Dementyev, V. E. (2017). Collective forms of management in the modern economy. Moscow: Scientific Library Publishing House, 356.
- Leyden, D. P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics, 46 (4), 553–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9706-0
- Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2), 140–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
- Mukhametlatypov, R. F., Gafarova, A. I. (2013). Plans of the joint-stock ownership of employees. ESOP Young scientist, 6, 389–390.
- Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Abuselidze, G., Mushnykova, S., Us, Yu. (2019). Safety of industrial enterprises development: evaluation of innovative and investment component. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-5/24
- Pylypenko, H., Fedorova, N., Huzenko, I., Naumenko, N. (2020). Paradoxes of economic development: science and innovation in the modern world. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 153–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-2/153
- Pylypenko, H. M., Prokhorova, V. V., Mrykhina, O. B., Koleshchuk, O. Y., Mushnykova, S. A. (2020). Cost evaluation models of R&D products of industrial enterprises. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 163–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-5/163
- Pylypenko, H. M. (2013). Cultural impact on the ratio of public and market coordination in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetut, 3, 118.
- Sirko, A. V. (2004). Corporate news in transition economies: problems of theory and practice. Kyiv: Іmeks, 414.
- Zawislak, P. A., Alves, A. C., Gamarra, J. E. T. et al. (2011). Innovation Capabilities of the Firm: The Brazilian Experience. 9th Globelics International Conference. Buenos Aires. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/75624375/Innovation_capabilities_of_the_firm_The_Brazilian_experience
- Pylypenko, Y., Pylypenko, H., Prokhorova, V. V., Mnykh, O. B., Dubiei, Yu. V. (2021). Transition to a new paradigm of human capital development in the dynamic environment of the knowledge economy. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 170–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-6/170
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Viktoriia Prokhorova, Yulia Bezuhla, Orest Koleshchuk, Anna Zaitseva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The consolidation and conditions for the transfer of copyright (identification of authorship) is carried out in the License Agreement. In particular, the authors reserve the right to the authorship of their manuscript and transfer the first publication of this work to the journal under the terms of the Creative Commons CC BY license. At the same time, they have the right to conclude on their own additional agreements concerning the non-exclusive distribution of the work in the form in which it was published by this journal, but provided that the link to the first publication of the article in this journal is preserved.
A license agreement is a document in which the author warrants that he/she owns all copyright for the work (manuscript, article, etc.).
The authors, signing the License Agreement with TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC, have all rights to the further use of their work, provided that they link to our edition in which the work was published.
According to the terms of the License Agreement, the Publisher TECHNOLOGY CENTER PC does not take away your copyrights and receives permission from the authors to use and dissemination of the publication through the world's scientific resources (own electronic resources, scientometric databases, repositories, libraries, etc.).
In the absence of a signed License Agreement or in the absence of this agreement of identifiers allowing to identify the identity of the author, the editors have no right to work with the manuscript.
It is important to remember that there is another type of agreement between authors and publishers – when copyright is transferred from the authors to the publisher. In this case, the authors lose ownership of their work and may not use it in any way.