Formation of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of enterprise development transparency

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.292324

Keywords:

economic freedom, entrepreneurial culture, strategic dominants, transparency, economic development

Abstract

Under today's unstable market conditions of business, one of the urgent problems has become the study of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of the transparency of the development of enterprises. This is due to the need to ensure the efficiency of activities and strengthen the competitiveness of Ukrainian enterprises in the European market. This defines economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as the most priority criteria for the transparency of enterprise development by vector and rank direction. The relationship between economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of the transparency of enterprise development was substantiated. The set of structural and logical subsystems of transparency of development, which are interconnected and functioning, taking into account the specifics of their impact on the strategic and analytical support of enterprises, has been studied. The variability of the strategic dominant influence of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture on the transparency of the development of enterprises was formed using the hierarchy analysis method. The obtained variability allows taking into account the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the degree of influence of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture on the general level of transparency of the development of enterprises, which is the basis for the development of strategically oriented areas of their activity

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Prokhorova, Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Yulia Bezuhla, Ukrainian Engineering Pedagogics Academy

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Orest Koleshchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Anna Zaitseva, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of International Economic Relations named Artur Golikov

References

  1. Ekonomika znan: vyklyky hlobalizatsiyi ta Ukraina (2004). Kyiv: Natsionalnyi instytut stratehichnykh doslidzhen, 268.
  2. Agrawal, R., Wankhede, V. A., Kumar, A., Upadhyay, A., Garza-Reyes, J. A. (2021). Nexus of circular economy and sustainable business performance in the era of digitalization. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71 (3), 748–774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ijppm-12-2020-0676
  3. Bezuhla, J., Kononenko, Ya., Bytiak, O., Zaitseva, A., Zacharchyn, H., Korin, M. (2021). Renovation and sustainable development of the industrial energy enterprise: economic and legal management mechanism. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628 (1), 012009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012009
  4. Bhattacharya, A. (2021). Achieving sustainability in supply chain operations in the interplay between circular economy and Industry 4.0. Production Planning & Control, 34 (10), 867–869. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1981032
  5. Charan, R., Carey, D., Barton, D. (2019). Talent wins: on a new approach to realizing HR potential. Moscow: Olymp-business, 224.
  6. Daisley, B. (2020). New rules of work. Generator of productive peace. Moscow: Bombora, 368.
  7. Desruelle, P., Nepelski, D. (2017). The “Innovation Radar”: A New Policy Tool to Support Innovation Management. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2944104
  8. Forsman, H. (2011). Innovation capacity and innovation development in small enterprises. A comparison between the manufacturing and service sectors. Research Policy, 40 (5), 739–750. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.003
  9. Horng, J.-S., Chou, S.-F., Liu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-Y. (2013). Creativity, aesthetics and eco-friendliness: A physical dining environment design synthetic assessment model of innovative restaurants. Tourism Management, 36, 15–25. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.11.002
  10. Khabibullin, R. I. (2018). Modern trends in the development of cooperation. Science and education issues, 14 (26).
  11. Khabibullin, R. I., Kleiner, G. B., Dementyev, V. E. (2017). Collective forms of management in the modern economy. Moscow: Scientific Library Publishing House, 356.
  12. Leyden, D. P. (2016). Public-sector entrepreneurship and the creation of a sustainable innovative economy. Small Business Economics, 46 (4), 553–564. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9706-0
  13. Mazzucato, M. (2016). From market fixing to market-creating: a new framework for innovation policy. Industry and Innovation, 23 (2), 140–156. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2016.1146124
  14. Mukhametlatypov, R. F., Gafarova, A. I. (2013). Plans of the joint-stock ownership of employees. ESOP Young scientist, 6, 389–390.
  15. Prokhorova, V., Protsenko, V., Abuselidze, G., Mushnykova, S., Us, Yu. (2019). Safety of industrial enterprises development: evaluation of innovative and investment component. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5. doi: https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-5/24
  16. Pylypenko, H., Fedorova, N., Huzenko, I., Naumenko, N. (2020). Paradoxes of economic development: science and innovation in the modern world. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 2, 153–159. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-2/153
  17. Pylypenko, H. M., Prokhorova, V. V., Mrykhina, O. B., Koleshchuk, O. Y., Mushnykova, S. A. (2020). Cost evaluation models of R&D products of industrial enterprises. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 163–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-5/163
  18. Pylypenko, H. M. (2013). Cultural impact on the ratio of public and market coordination in Ukraine. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetut, 3, 118.
  19. Sirko, A. V. (2004). Corporate news in transition economies: problems of theory and practice. Kyiv: Іmeks, 414.
  20. Zawislak, P. A., Alves, A. C., Gamarra, J. E. T. et al. (2011). Innovation Capabilities of the Firm: The Brazilian Experience. 9th Globelics International Conference. Buenos Aires. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/75624375/Innovation_capabilities_of_the_firm_The_Brazilian_experience
  21. Pylypenko, Y., Pylypenko, H., Prokhorova, V. V., Mnykh, O. B., Dubiei, Yu. V. (2021). Transition to a new paradigm of human capital development in the dynamic environment of the knowledge economy. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 170–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2021-6/170
Formation of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of enterprise development transparency

Downloads

Published

2023-12-28

How to Cite

Prokhorova, V., Bezuhla, Y., Koleshchuk, O., & Zaitseva, A. (2023). Formation of economic freedom and entrepreneurial culture as strategic dominants of enterprise development transparency. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6(13 (126), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.292324

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology