Identifying the risks of armed conflict impact on the ecosystem

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298430

Keywords:

military conflict, risks, sustainability, ecosystem, mathematical model, material flows, geoinformation systems

Abstract

The object of the study is the territory that became the object of the influence of hostilities. The study is dedicated to finding ways to assess the state of ecosystems and ensure their stability in the conditions of military conflicts.

The impact of military conflict on the environment is highlighted through the analysis of risks and losses in ecosystems.

It has been studied that the intensity of armed conflicts determines the scale and degree of damage to ecosystems, and the use of destructive weapons leads to the direct destruction of natural environments and their components.

It has been determined by an expert survey that the most significant changes in natural ecosystems are the biodiversity losses, deforestation, territorial changes and the destruction of natural objects (scores ≥9.0). Factors of low impact (score <6.75) are air pollution, erosion due to air pollution, biodiversity losses due to water pollution.

The interrelationships between military actions and environmental pollution are studied for the importance of understanding these processes for effective management of environmental security during military conflicts.

A mathematical and graphic model of material flows has been developed, which allows taking into account resource flows, pollution and losses in the ecosystem during armed conflicts.

The model, tested in the Kyiv region, made it possible to determine the priorities of conservation and risk management. Analysis of 9,000 km2 revealed contaminated areas, in particular, in the southwestern and western directions.

The practical use of the research results is in the development of strategies for minimizing and restoring the ecological consequences of armed conflicts. This can help improve the management of natural resources in the context of military operations and increase the resilience of ecosystems

Author Biographies

Iryna Kyrpychova, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Horticulture and Ecology

Kateryna Berezenko, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University; Public Organization "Balanced Development – East"

Senior Lecturer

Department of Horticulture and Ecology

Olena Bordiuhova, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Lecturer

Department of Horticulture and Ecology

Serhii Skakovskyi, Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University

Assistant

Department of Horticulture and Ecology

Nadiia Sopova, State Biotechnological University

Senior Lecturer

Department of Land Management, Geodesy and Cadastre

Yuliia Chupryna, State Biotechnological University

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Ecology and Biotechnology in Crop Production

Serhii Liubytskyi, State Biotechnological University

Postgraduate Student

Department of Ecology and Biotechnology in Crop Production

Bohdana Komarysta, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Vladyslav Bendiuh, National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Mathematical Methods of System Analysis

Oleksandr Nosyriev, National Technical University "Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute"

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Tourism and Hospitality Business

References

  1. Wenning, R. J., Tomasi, T. D. (2023). Using US Natural Resource Damage Assessment to understand the environmental consequences of the war in Ukraine. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 19 (2), 366–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4716
  2. Hanson, T. (2018). Biodiversity conservation and armed conflict: a warfare ecology perspective. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1429 (1), 50–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13689
  3. Gardashuk, T. (2022). Environmental Threats of War in Ukraine. Envigogika, 17 (1). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.639
  4. Sasmoko, Imran, M., Khan, S., Khan, H. ur R., Jambari, H., Musah, M. B., Zaman, K. (2023). War psychology: The global carbon emissions impact of the Ukraine-Russia conflict. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1065301
  5. Mobaied, S., Rudant, J.-P. (2019). New method for environmental monitoring in armed conflict zones: a case study of Syria. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 191 (11). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7805-5
  6. Almohamad, H. (2020). Impact of Land Cover Change Due to Armed Conflicts on Soil Erosion in the Basin of the Northern Al-Kabeer River in Syria Using the RUSLE Model. Water, 12 (12), 3323. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12123323
  7. Qayyum, U., Anjum, S., Samina Sabir (2021). Armed conflict, militarization and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from South Asia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 281, 125299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125299
  8. Aung, T. S. (2021). Satellite analysis of the environmental impacts of armed-conflict in Rakhine, Myanmar. Science of The Total Environment, 781, 146758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146758
  9. Ma, Y., Lyu, D., Sun, K., Li, S., Zhu, B., Zhao, R. et al. (2022). Spatiotemporal Analysis and War Impact Assessment of Agricultural Land in Ukraine Using RS and GIS Technology. Land, 11 (10), 1810. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11101810
  10. Mohamed, M., Anders, J., Schneider, C. (2020). Monitoring of Changes in Land Use/Land Cover in Syria from 2010 to 2018 Using Multitemporal Landsat Imagery and GIS. Land, 9 (7), 226. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9070226
Identifying the risks of armed conflict impact on the ecosystem

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Kyrpychova, I., Berezenko, K., Bordiuhova, O., Skakovskyi, S., Sopova, N., Chupryna, Y., Liubytskyi, S., Komarysta, B., Bendiuh, V., & Nosyriev, O. (2024). Identifying the risks of armed conflict impact on the ecosystem. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(10 (127), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298430