Improving a method for non-coherent processing of signals by a network of two small-sized radars for detecting a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298598

Keywords:

small-sized radar, aerial object detection, incoherent processing, conditional probability of correct detection

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of detecting stealth unmanned aerial vehicles by a network of two small-sized radars with incoherent signal processing. The main hypothesis of the study assumed that combining two small-sized radars into a network could improve the quality of detection of stealth unmanned aerial vehicles with incoherent signal processing.

The improved method for detecting a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of two small-sized radars with incoherent signal processing, unlike the known ones, provides for the following:

– synchronous inspection of the airspace by small-sized radars;

– sounding signal emission by each small-sized radar;

– reception of echo signals from a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle by two small-sized radars;

– coordinated filtering of incoming echo signals (separation of echo signals);

– quadratic detection of signals at the outputs of matched filters;

– summation of the detected signals at the outputs of the matched filters;

– summation of the outputs of adders of two small-sized radars.

The scheme of a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle detector is presented, optimal according to the Neumann-Pearson criterion, with incoherent signal processing.

The quality of detection of a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of two small-sized radars with incoherent signal processing was evaluated. It was found that with incoherent processing, the gain in the value of the conditional probability of correct detection is on average from 19 % to 26 %, depending on the value of the signal-to-noise ratio. The gain in the value of the conditional probability of correct detection is greater at low values of the signal-to-noise ratio. At the same time, the gain in signal-to-noise value is more significant with coherent signal processing than with non-coherent signal processing by a network of two small-sized radars

Author Biographies

Hennadii Khudov, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Serhii Yarosh, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor

Department of Anti-Aircraft Missile Forces Tactic

Oleksandr Kostyria, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Oleksandr Oleksenko, Air Force Command of UA Armed Forces

PhD, Chief

Department of Scientific Research

Mykola Khomik, The National Defence University of Ukraine

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Senior Researcher, Leading Researcher

Military and Strategic Research Centre

Andrii Zvonko, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

PhD, Senior Lecturer

Department of Rocket Artillery Armament

Bohdan Lisohorskyi, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

PhD, Senior Researcher

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Petro Mynko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Higher Mathematics

Serhii Sukonko, National Academy of the National Guard of Ukraine

PhD, Chief

Research Laboratory

Taras Kravets, Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Army Academy

Lecturer

Department of Artillery Facility Complexes and Devices

References

  1. Erl, J. (2022). Sensing digital objects in the air: Ultraleap introduces new technology. Available at: https://mixed-news.com/en/sensing-digital-objects-in-the-air-ultraleap-introduces-new-technology
  2. Carafano, J. J. (2022). Rapid advancements in military tech. Available at: https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/military-technology
  3. Sentinel Radar. Available at: https://www.rtx.com/raytheon/what-we-do/land/sentinel-radar
  4. NASAMS anti-aircraft missile system. Available at: https://en.missilery.info/missile/nasams
  5. US Sentinel Radar Was Recorded in Ukraine. Available at: https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/us_sentinel_radar_was_recorded_in_ukraine-3357.html
  6. Kalibr. Naval Cruise missile family. Available at: https://www.militarytoday.com/missiles/kalibr.htm
  7. Orlan-10 Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle (UAV). Available at: https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/orlan-10-unmanned-aerial-vehicle-uav/#catfish
  8. Khudov, H., Berezhnyi, A., Oleksenko, O., Maliuha, V., Balyk, I., Herda, M. et al. (2023). Increasing of the accuracy of determining the coordinates of an aerial object in the two-position network of small-sized radars. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (9 (125)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.289623
  9. Bezouwen, J., Brandfass, M. (2017). Technology Trends for Future Radar. Microwave Journal. Available at: http://www.microwavejournal.com/articles/29367-technology-trends-for-future-radar
  10. Richards, M. A., Scheer, J. A., Holm, W. A. (Eds.) (2010). Principles of Modern Radar: Basic principles. Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/sbra021e
  11. Chernyak, V. (2014). Signal detection with MIMO radars. Uspehi sovremennoj radiojelectroniki, 7, 35–48.
  12. Lishchenko, V., Kalimulin, T., Khizhnyak, I., Khudov, H. (2018). The Method of the organization Coordinated Work for Air Surveillance in MIMO Radar. 2018 International Conference on Information and Telecommunication Technologies and Radio Electronics (UkrMiCo). https://doi.org/10.1109/ukrmico43733.2018.9047560
  13. Khudov, H. (2020). The Coherent Signals Processing Method in the Multiradar System of the Same Type Two-coordinate Surveillance Radars with Mechanical Azimuthal Rotation. International Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering Research, 8 (6), 2624–2630. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijeter/2020/66862020
  14. Neyt, X., Raout, J., Kubica, M., Kubica, V., Roques, S., Acheroy, M., Verly, J. G. (2006). Feasibility of STAP for Passive GSM-Based Radar. 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar. https://doi.org/10.1109/radar.2006.1631853
  15. Multilateration (MLAT) Concept of Use. Edition 1.0 (2007). ICAO Asia and Pacific Office. Available at: https://www.icao.int/APAC/Documents/edocs/mlat_concept.pdf
  16. Willis, N. J. (2004). Bistatic Radar. Institution of Engineering and Technology. Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/sbra003e
  17. Lishchenko, V., Khudov, H., Tiutiunnyk, V., Kuprii, V., Zots, F., Misiyuk, G. (2019). The Method of Increasing the Detection Range of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles In Multiradar Systems Based on Surveillance Radars. 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Electronics and Nanotechnology (ELNANO). https://doi.org/10.1109/elnano.2019.8783263
  18. Ruban, I., Khudov, H., Lishchenko, V., Pukhovyi, O., Popov, S., Kolos, R., Kravets, T. et al. (2020). Assessing the detection zones of radar stations with the additional use of radiation from external sources. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (9 (108)), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.216118
  19. LORAN-C. Available at: https://skybrary.aero/articles/loran-c
  20. Neven, W. H., Quilter, T. J., Weedon, R., Hogendoorn, R. A. (2005). Wide Area Multilateration Report on EATMP TRS 131/04 Version 1.1. Available at: https://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/2019-05/surveilllance-report-wide-area-multilateration-200508.pdf
  21. Mantilla-Gaviria, I. A., Leonardi, M., Balbastre-Tejedor, J. V., de los Reyes, E. (2013). On the application of singular value decomposition and Tikhonov regularization to ill-posed problems in hyperbolic passive location. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 57 (7-8), 1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2012.03.004
  22. Schau, H., Robinson, A. (1987). Passive source localization employing intersecting spherical surfaces from time-of-arrival differences. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 35 (8), 1223–1225. https://doi.org/10.1109/tassp.1987.1165266
  23. Ryu, H., Wee, I., Kim, T., Shim, D. H. (2020). Heterogeneous sensor fusion based omnidirectional object detection. 2020 20th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS). https://doi.org/10.23919/iccas50221.2020.9268431
  24. Salman, S., Mir, J., Farooq, M. T., Malik, A. N., Haleemdeen, R. (2021). Machine Learning Inspired Efficient Audio Drone Detection using Acoustic Features. 2021 International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technologies (IBCAST). https://doi.org/10.1109/ibcast51254.2021.9393232
  25. Liu, Y., Yi, J., Wan, X., Cheng, F., Rao, Y., Gong, Z. (2018). Experimental Research on Micro-Doppler Effect of Multi-rotor Drone with Digital Television Based Passive Radar. Journal of Radars, 7 (5), 585–592. https://doi.org/10.12000/JR18062
  26. Wang, W. (2016). Overview of frequency diverse array in radar and navigation applications. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation, 10 (6), 1001–1012. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-rsn.2015.0464
  27. Li, J., Stoica, P. (Eds.) (2008). MIMO Radar Signal Processing. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470391488
  28. Li, Y. (2021). MIMO Radar Waveform Design: An Overview. Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology, 30 (1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.15918/j.jbit1004-0579.2021.002
  29. Oleksenko, O., Khudov, H., Petrenko, K., Horobets, Y., Kolianda, V., Kuchuk, N. et al. (2021). The Development of the Method of Radar Observation System Construction of the Airspace on the Basis of Genetic Algorithm. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 11 (8), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.46338/ijetae0821_04
  30. Khudov, H., Berezhnyi, A., Yarosh, S., Oleksenko, O., Khomik, M., Yuzova, I. et al. (2023). Improving a method for detecting and measuring coordinates of a stealth aerial vehicle by a network of two small-sized radars. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (9 (126)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.293276
  31. Chang, L. ZALA Lancet. Loitering munition. Available at: https://www.militarytoday.com/aircraft/lancet.htm
  32. Shin, S. ‐J. (2017). Radar measurement accuracy associated with target RCS fluctuation. Electronics Letters, 53 (11), 750–752. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2017.0901
  33. Kishk, A., Chen, X. (Eds.) (2023). MIMO Communications - Fundamental Theory, Propagation Channels, and Antenna Systems. IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.110927
Improving a method for non-coherent processing of signals by a network of two small-sized radars for detecting a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Khudov, H., Yarosh, S., Kostyria, O., Oleksenko, O., Khomik, M., Zvonko, A., Lisohorskyi, B., Mynko, P., Sukonko, S., & Kravets, T. (2024). Improving a method for non-coherent processing of signals by a network of two small-sized radars for detecting a stealth unmanned aerial vehicle. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1(9 (127), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.298598

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system