Determining directions for transforming the organization's competence structure depending on its life cycle stage in the context of enabling effective operation in the market

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300910

Keywords:

competent organization, organization competencies, organization development, organization management, management task

Abstract

The object of research is the process of functioning of organizations at different stages of the life cycle (LC). Papers addressing the management of organizations ignore the need for them to acquire competence to successfully solve the tasks of each stage. This directed the research to the definition of priority management tasks, determined by the nature of activity at different stages of LC, and the competencies necessary for their solution. The directions of the transformation of the structure of organizational competence due to the change in the frequency of reference by heads of organizations to its members in the process of solving tasks have been determined. The importance of functional and basic component competencies at the birth stage was noted (36.7 and 38.7 % of reference in the total number). The increase in the frequency of reference to the competencies of synergistic, key, and strategic components (3.4; 2.2; 1.66 times) at the stage of intensive growth is explained by the organization gaining authority in business circles, the possibility of its use for lobbying organizational interests. Among the competences at the stage of maturity, representatives of the synergistic and functional components prevail – the increase in the frequency of reference by 1.44 and 1.1 times, respectively. The share of reference to the competences of the basic component is also high (40 %). At the stage of decline, functional and basic competencies remained important (36.9 and 39.5 %), in particular, the competencies of managers in ensuring the most painless liquidation of the organization.

A distinctive feature of the study is the addition of the procedure for determining the stage of LC with a list of priority tasks and the competencies necessary for their solution. This made it possible to understand the directions of the transformation of competence, to identify the need for the development of competences due to the organization's position on the life cycle curve or its change

Author Biographies

Inna Gruzina, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Business

Tetyana Lepeyko, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Management and Business

Kateryna Lohinova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Business

Ivanna Pererva, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Business

Olga Myronova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Business

References

  1. Gruzina, I. (2022). Determinants of a competent organization. Economic Scope, 181, 95–98. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/181-16
  2. Gruzina, I. (2023). Justification of the hierarchical structure of the organisation’s competence structure. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 29, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.32782/2415-3583/29.10
  3. Gruzina, I. (2023). Substantiation of the impact of life cycle stages on the organization’s competence structure. Economic Scope, 187, 97–103. https://doi.org/10.32782/2224-6282/187-16
  4. Batchenko, L. V., Honchar, L. O. (2019). Development of professional competences of personnel as the basis of economic growth. Actual Problems of Economics, 11 (221), 22–33. Available at: https://eco-science.net/archive/2019/APE-11-2019/11.19_topic_Batchenko%20L.V,%20Honchar%20L.O.pdf
  5. Voloboieva, I., Kravchuk, O., Parashchuk, Y. (2021). Universal competency model for working in remote mode. Economy and Society, 25. https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2021-25-36
  6. Suttipun, M., Sattayarak, O., Duangpanya, P., Runglertkrengkrai, S. (2018). Relationship between competency as per the international education standards for accounting professionals and the awareness and understanding of the Thai financial reporting standards for small and medium sized enterprises: A case study of accounting professionals in Thailand’s southern region. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 39 (3), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.06.013
  7. Aryal, A., Truex, D., El Amrani, R. (2023). Lessons from enterprise systems competency centers in adopting digital transformation initiatives: An assemblage approach. Information and Organization, 33 (4), 100490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infoandorg.2023.100490
  8. García-Cabrera, A. M., Martín-Santana, J. D., Déniz-Déniz, M. de la C., Suárez-Ortega, S. M., García-Soto, M. G., Melián-Alzola, L. (2023). The relevance of entrepreneurial competences from a faculty and students’ perspective: The role of consensus for the achievement of competences. The International Journal of Management Education, 21 (2), 100774. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100774
  9. Fenfang, L. (2019). Empirical Research on the Effectiveness of Enterprise Performance Evaluation from EVA Perspective – A Case Study of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises. Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Social Sciences and Economic Development (ICSSED 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/icssed-19.2019.46
  10. Dmytryshyn, M., Goran, T. (2022). Proposal of an effective time management system. Management, 27 (2), 283–298. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.27.2.15
  11. Fejzullahu, A., Govori, F. (2021). Working capital management and profitability of manufacturing companies in Kosovo. Management, 26 (2), 277–294. https://doi.org/10.30924/mjcmi.26.2.16
  12. Costa, D., Quinteiro, P., Dias, A. C. (2019). A systematic review of life cycle sustainability assessment: Current state, methodological challenges, and implementation issues. Science of The Total Environment, 686, 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.435
  13. Voronkova, T., Nesenyuk, А. (2019). Recurrence of world development and conformity to law of origin of economic crises. Efektyvna ekonomika, 11. https://doi.org/10.32702/2307-2105-2019.11.63
  14. Matiushenko, O. I. (2010). Zhyttievyi tsykl pidpryiemstva: sutnist, modeli, otsinka. Problemy ekonomiky, 4, 82–91. Available at: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2010-4_0-pages-82_91.pdf
  15. Yarmak, M. R. (2016). Vyznachennia stadiyi zhyttievoho tsyklu silskohospodarskoho pidpryiemstva. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho universytetu. Seriya: Ekonomika, 2 (48), 247–254. Available at: https://dspace.uzhnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/lib/15502
  16. Vasylieva, Т. А., Chmutova, I. M. (2015). Empirical model of a bank life cycle. Actual Problems of Economics, 10 (172), 352–361. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303283083_Empirical_model_of_a_bank_life_cycle
  17. Padilla-Rivera, A., Hannouf, M., Assefa, G., Gates, I. (2023). A systematic literature review on current application of life cycle sustainability assessment: A focus on economic dimension and emerging technologies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 103, 107268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107268
  18. Motsnyi, F. V. (2018). Chi-square, Student and Fisher-Snedecor Statistical Distributions and Their Application. Statistics of Ukraine, 80 (1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(80).2018.01.02
  19. Mosca, L., Gianecchini, M., Campagnolo, D. (2021). Organizational life cycle models: a design perspective. Journal of Organization Design, 10 (1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41469-021-00090-7
  20. Mousavi, A., Mohammadzadeh, M., Zare, H. (2022). Developing a System Dynamic Model for Product Life Cycle Management of Generic Pharmaceutical Products: Its Relation with Open Innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8 (1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010014
  21. Mousavi, A., Mohammadzadeh, M., Zare, H. (2022). A Clustering Approach to Identify the Organizational Life Cycle. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8 (3), 108. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8030108
  22. Primc, K., Kalar, B., Slabe-Erker, R., Dominko, M., Ogorevc, M. (2020). Circular economy configuration indicators in organizational life cycle theory. Ecological Indicators, 116, 106532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106532
  23. Silvola, H. (2008). Do organizational life-cycle and venture capital investors affect the management control systems used by the firm? Advances in Accounting, 24 (1), 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2008.05.013
  24. Dantas, T. E. T., Soares, S. R. (2021). Systematic literature review on the application of life cycle sustainability assessment in the energy sector. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24 (2), 1583–1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01559-x
  25. Fauzi, R. T., Lavoie, P., Sorelli, L., Heidari, M. D., Amor, B. (2019). Exploring the Current Challenges and Opportunities of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment. Sustainability, 11 (3), 636. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030636
  26. Henzler, K., Maier, S. D., Jäger, M., Horn, R. (2020). SDG-Based Sustainability Assessment Methodology for Innovations in the Field of Urban Surfaces. Sustainability, 12 (11), 4466. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114466
  27. Kambanou, M. L. (2020). Additional uses for life cycle costing in life cycle management. Procedia CIRP, 90, 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2020.01.128
Determining directions for transforming the organization's competence structure depending on its life cycle stage in the context of enabling effective operation in the market

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Gruzina, I., Lepeyko, T., Lohinova, K., Pererva, I., & Myronova, O. (2024). Determining directions for transforming the organization’s competence structure depending on its life cycle stage in the context of enabling effective operation in the market. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (128), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.300910

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology