Defining the directions for the impact of administrative management tools on the project management system

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.302633

Keywords:

administrative management tools, project management system, production processes, construction industry

Abstract

The object of this study is project management under the changing conditions of the modern economy. The way the top management of the company affects the implementation of projects in various sectors and branches of production is an issue related to business development in general. An increasing number of enterprises use project tools to adjust production processes. To this end, in particular, it is advisable to use administrative management tools against the background of its improvement at the level of the company's management.

The logic of this study construction implies an emphasis on theoretical and experimental components. The theoretical foundations of the study include the identification of administrative management tools. The coverage of the experimental part is devoted to multifactorial regression analysis (the coefficient of determination is 0.715) of the influence of administrative management factors on the effectiveness of projects based on construction excavations.

The interpretation of the research data confirms that the administrative management toolkit could be optimally used to establish high-quality project management.

Based on the study of aspects of the relationship between administrative management and project management, the definition of administrative management and the project management system at modern enterprises is proposed.

The study concluded that it is necessary to use those levers that are common in companies of industrialized countries of the world. Europe's experience will be useful in spreading the practice of project management in enterprises of countries with transition economies. The results of the research could be used at enterprises of various sectors of industry, agriculture, and the service domain, in particular at construction enterprises that were chosen as the object of research

Author Biographies

Tetiana Ostapenko, National Aviation University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department

Department of Management Technologies

Oleksandr Ponomarov, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Technologies

Yurii Turlo, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management Technologies

Yevheniia Osypova, State University of Infrastructure and Technologies

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management and Public Administration

Oleksandr Onopriienko, National Aviation University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Management of Foreign Economic Activities of Enterprises

References

  1. Novikova, M. (2020). Role and place of administrative management in the system of organizations’ management. Scientific Notes of Ostroh Academy National University, “Economics” Series, 1 (16 (44)), 86–90. https://doi.org/10.25264/2311-5149-2020-16(44)-86-90
  2. Balan, O. S. (2017). Administrative management and mechanisms of its development. Economic journal Odessa polytechnic university, 2 (2), 6–10. Available at: http://dspace.op.edu.ua/jspui/bitstream/123456789/8072/1/6.pdf
  3. Minenkho, M. A. (2012). Suchasni pidkhody do pobudovy efektyvnoi systemy administratyvnoho menedzhmentu pidpryiemstva. Ekonomika ta derzhava, 12, 4–7. Available at: http://www.economy.in.ua/pdf/12_2012/3.pdf
  4. Tylchynska, S., Kyrychenko, S., Savits'kyj, N. (2018). Tqm model as a tool which increases the level of products' competitiveness of domestic enterprises. Investytsiyi: praktyka ta dosvid, 8, 14–17. Available at: http://www.investplan.com.ua/?op=1&z=6037&i=2
  5. Shevchenko, O. M., Bratus, Yu. M. (2014). Economic Essence of Benchmarking and its Role in Innovation Development of the Enterprise. Business Inform, 4, 64–68. Available at: http://jnas.nbuv.gov.ua/article/UJRN-0000238375
  6. Project Management Job Growth and Talent Gap 2017–2027 (2017). PMI. Available at: https://www.pmi.org/learning/careers/job-growth
  7. Nadler, D. A., Tushman, M. L. (1980). A model for diagnosing organizational behavior. Organizational Dynamics, 9 (2), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(80)90039-x
  8. Kadic-Maglajlic, S., Boso, N., Micevski, M. (2018). How internal marketing drive customer satisfaction in matured and maturing European markets? Journal of Business Research, 86, 291–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.09.024
  9. Nastanovy shchodo zdiysnennia audytiv system upravlinnia (ISO 19011:2011, IDT). Kyiv. Available at: https://zakon.isu.net.ua/sites/default/files/normdocs/iso_19011.pdf
  10. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) (2013). PMI. Available at: https://repository.dinus.ac.id/docs/ajar/PMBOKGuide_5th_Ed.pdf
  11. Guidance on project management (ISO 21500:2012). Available at: https://www.slideshare.net/DominikDorner/iso-21500-guidance-on-project-management-37183859
  12. Bagashova, N. V. (2015). Foreign and domestic trends of project management development. Efektyvna ekonomika, 6. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4154
  13. Kudelya, V., Gritsenko, N. (2020). Personnel adaptation management modern enterprise. Scientific Notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University. Series: Economy and Management, 70 (4). https://doi.org/10.32838/2523-4803/70-4-23
  14. Cao, Q. (Ray), Swain, A. (Ajay) K., Sirisomboonsuk, P., Gu, V. C. (2024). Effects of Authentic Leadership, Behavioral Integrity, and Project Governance on Project Performance. Project Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728241231936
  15. Bosch-Rekveldt, M., Bourne, M., Forster, R., Kirkham, R., Pesämaa, O. (2023). Performance measurement in project management. International Journal of Project Management, 41 (7), 102518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102518
  16. Pinto, J. K., Davis, K., Ika, L. A., Jugdev, K., Zwikael, O. (2022). Coming to terms with project success: Current perspectives and future challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 40 (7), 831–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.09.001
  17. Iftikhar, R., Müller, R., Ahola, T. (2021). Crises and Coping Strategies in Megaprojects: The Case of the Islamabad–Rawalpindi Metro Bus Project in Pakistan. Project Management Journal, 52 (4), 394–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/87569728211015850
  18. Zwikael, O., Meredith, J. R., Smyrk, J. (2019). The responsibilities of the project owner in benefits realization. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 39 (4), 503–524. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-02-2018-0086
Defining the directions for the impact of administrative management tools on the project management system

Downloads

Published

2024-04-30

How to Cite

Ostapenko, T., Ponomarov, O., Turlo, Y., Osypova, Y., & Onopriienko, O. (2024). Defining the directions for the impact of administrative management tools on the project management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(13 (128), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.302633

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology