Improving linear programming model for assessing product sales taking into account social responsibility of consumers

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.310548

Keywords:

environmentally-conscious consumption, environmentally-friendly products, sales structure in the market, linear programming

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of analyzing the volume of product sales in the retail market, where producers and consumers with different levels of social responsibility operate. Advancements are aimed at solving the problem of insufficient consideration of the social responsibility of economic entities in modern economic and mathematical models. In the work, the improvement of the linear programming model, intended for the evaluation of sales of alternative variants of goods with different social utility to consumers with different social responsibility, by taking into account some real conditions of making purchases, was carried out. As a result of the study, a modification of the model was proposed that makes it possible to take into account the behavior of buyers who choose a product randomly. Also, with the help of additional restrictions, the model takes into account the fact that consumers with different social responsibility make purchases in parallel in time. In addition, the approach to identifying a set of consumer groups in the aspect of social responsibility using the method of questionnaires of the ranking type and building a decision tree of consumers is described.

The proposed modification of the model was tested on the example of evaluating the sales volumes of environmentally-friendly and non-environmentally-friendly varieties of goods in the office paper market. It is shown that not taking into account the added restrictions in the model could significantly affect the estimates of sales volumes.

The proposed improvements to the model make it possible to obtain more realistic estimates of the volume of sales of goods, taking into account the social responsibility of consumers, as well as quantitative and qualitative characteristics of competitors’ offers. This contributes to better decision-making support for manufacturing socially useful products, in particular, environmentally-friendly ones

Author Biography

Liudmyla Potrashkova, Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Systems and Technologies

References

  1. Čater, T., Čater, B., Milić, P., Žabkar, V. (2023). Drivers of corporate environmental and social responsibility practices: A comparison of two moderated mediation models. Journal of Business Research, 159, 113652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113652
  2. Potrashkova, L. V. (2017). Conceptual framework for simulation of socially responsible activities of an enterprise. Actual Problems of Economics, 6 (192), 243–253.
  3. Potrashkova, L. V. (2018). The Support of Decision-Making for Strategic Planning of the Socially Responsible Activity of Enterprise on the Basis of Evaluation of its Potential. Business Inform, 11, 187–201. Available at: https://www.business-inform.net/annotated-catalogue/?year=2018&abstract=2018_11_0&lang=ua&stqa=27
  4. Mahmud, A. (2024). How and when consumer corporate social responsibility knowledge influences green purchase behavior: A moderated-mediated model. Heliyon, 10 (3), e24680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24680
  5. Benos, T., Burkert, M., Hüttl-Maack, V., Petropoulou, E. (2022). When mindful consumption meets short food supply chains: Empirical evidence on how higher-level motivations influence consumers. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 33, 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2022.07.028
  6. Rios, K., Finkelstein, S. R., Landa, J. (2014). Is There a “Fair” in Fair-Trade? Social Dominance Orientation Influences Perceptions of and Preferences for Fair-Trade Products. Journal of Business Ethics, 130 (1), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2221-9
  7. Saboya de Aragão, B., Alfinito, S. (2021). The relationship between human values and conscious ecological behavior among consumers: Evidence from Brazil. Cleaner and Responsible Consumption, 3, 100024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2021.100024
  8. Swaen, V., Demoulin, N., Pauwels-Delassus, V. (2021). Impact of customers’ perceptions regarding corporate social responsibility and irresponsibility in the grocery retailing industry: The role of corporate reputation. Journal of Business Research, 131, 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.12.016
  9. Laguna Salvadó, L., Villeneuve, E., Masson, D., Abi Akle, A., Bur, N. (2022). Decision Support System for technology selection based on multi-criteria ranking: Application to NZEB refurbishment. Building and Environment, 212, 108786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108786
  10. Kadziński, M., Rocchi, L., Miebs, G., Grohmann, D., Menconi, M. E., Paolotti, L. (2017). Multiple Criteria Assessment of Insulating Materials with a Group Decision Framework Incorporating Outranking Preference Model and Characteristic Class Profiles. Group Decision and Negotiation, 27 (1), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-017-9549-3
  11. McFadden, D.; Zarembka, P. (Ed.) (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics. Academic Press, 105–142. Available at: https://eml.berkeley.edu/reprints/mcfadden/zarembka.pdf
  12. Jürkenbeck, K., Schulze, M. (2024). Consumer preferences and willingness to pay for apples from agrivoltaics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 465, 142854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142854
  13. De Marchi, E., Scappaticci, G., Banterle, A., Alamprese, C. (2024). What is the role of environmental sustainability knowledge in food choices? A case study on egg consumers in Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141038
  14. Gracia, A., de Magistris, T. (2008). The demand for organic foods in the South of Italy: A discrete choice model. Food Policy, 33 (5), 386–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.12.002
  15. Risius, A., Hamm, U., Janssen, M. (2019). Target groups for fish from aquaculture: Consumer segmentation based on sustainability attributes and country of origin. Aquaculture, 499, 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.09.044
  16. Qian, L., Soopramanien, D. (2015). Incorporating heterogeneity to forecast the demand of new products in emerging markets: Green cars in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.008
  17. Madudova, E., Dávid, A. (2019). Identifying the derived utility function of transport services: case study of rail and sea container transport. Transportation Research Procedia, 40, 1096–1102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2019.07.153
  18. Shoji, Y., Kim, H., Tsuge, T., Kuriyama, K. (2023). Impact of user fees for visitors to national parks in the presence of alternative sites. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 4 (2), 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2023.100104
  19. Gallego, G., Ratliff, R., Shebalov, S. (2015). A General Attraction Model and Sales-Based Linear Program for Network Revenue Management Under Customer Choice. Operations Research, 63 (1), 212–232. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2014.1328
  20. Vasilyev, A., Maier, S., Seifert, R. W. (2023). Assortment optimization using an attraction model in an omnichannel environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 306 (1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.08.002
  21. Potrashkova, L. (2018). Some models of demand for benefits, offered by an enterprise. Economics of Development, 17 (3), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.21511/ed.17(3).2018.03
Improving linear programming model for assessing product sales taking into account social responsibility of consumers

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Potrashkova, L. (2024). Improving linear programming model for assessing product sales taking into account social responsibility of consumers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(4 (130), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.310548

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects