Devising a method for integrated dataset formation and selecting a model for recognizing the technical condition of unmanned aerial vehicle

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.312217

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle, training dataset, machine learning, jamming effectiveness evaluation

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of forming a training dataset for diagnosing the technical condition of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) using machine-learning algorithms. UAV flights are extremely important for various aspects of troop deployment. Combat UAV flights are performed under the influence of negative factors that cause flight special cases (FSC), which hinder the execution of combat missions, lead to mission failures, and result in the aircraft damage or loss. The available capabilities of autopilots are not enough for control under complex conditions, and in certain situations, the human operator cannot timely recognize a flight special case, including evaluation of the destructive impact of enemy’s electronic warfare systems on communication channels and operation of UAV. Therefore, the urgent issue is the intellectualization of onboard control systems, particularly towards recognizing the current technical state of UAV using artificial intelligence methods. To design such systems, labeled datasets are required. The procedure for forming datasets that consider the specificity of UAV construction and their combat use under adversarial conditions is not defined, necessitating the development of an appropriate method.

Based on the well-known CRISP-DM methodology, a method for dataset formation has been proposed for subsequent use in artificial intelligence systems that use various machine-learning methods.

This method differs from existing ones by considering the specificity of combat mission execution under adversarial conditions, which allowed for an 8.0 % increase in the accuracy of recognizing special cases in UAV flights by the onboard system. It also enabled timely detection of electronic warfare impacts on UAV and evaluation of the effectiveness of radio signal receivers jamming

Author Biographies

Oleksandr Perehuda, Korolov Zhytomyr Military Institute

PhD

Scientific Research Center

Andrii Rodionov, Korolov Zhytomyr Military Institute

Scientific and Organizational Department

Dmytro Fedorchuk, Korolov Zhytomyr Military Institute

PhD, Deputy Head of the Institute for Scientific Work

Serhii Zhuravskyi, Korolov Zhytomyr Military Institute

Department of Radio Electronic Warfare

Mykola Konvisar, Scientific-Research Center of Missile Troops and Artillery

Research Laboratory of Field Measurements

Taras Volynets, Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

PhD Student

Mykola Zakalad, The National Defence University of Ukraine

Military and Strategic Research Centre

Serhii Tsybulia, The National Defence University of Ukraine

PhD

Military and Strategic Research Centre

Taras Trysnyuk, Institute of Telecommunications and Global Information Space of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine

PhD

Department of Applied Informatics

References

  1. Petruk, S. M. (2017). Bezpilotni aviatsiyni kompleksy v zbroinykh konfliktakh ostannikh desiatyrich. Ozbroiennia Ta Viyskova Tekhnika, 13 (1), 44–49. https://doi.org/10.34169/2414-0651.2017.1(13).44-49
  2. Pavlenko, M., Tikhonov, I., Nikiforov, I. (2021). Recommendations for the efficient use of unmanned aerial vehicles in Joint Forces Operation. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 1 (42), 131–136. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2021.42.17
  3. Gudla, C., Rana, S., Sung, A. (2018). Defense techniques against cyber attacks on unmanned aerial vehicles. Proceedings of the International Conference on Embedded Systems, Cyber-physical Systems, and Applications (ESCS). The Steering Committee of The World Congress in Computer Science, 110–116. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328135272_Defense_Techniques_Against_Cyber_Attacks_on_Unmanned_Aerial_Vehicles
  4. Javaid, A. Y., Sun, W., Devabhaktuni, V. K., Alam, M. (2012). Cyber security threat analysis and modeling of an unmanned aerial vehicle system. 2012 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST). https://doi.org/10.1109/ths.2012.6459914
  5. Kerns, A. J., Shepard, D. P., Bhatti, J. A., Humphreys, T. E. (2014). Unmanned Aircraft Capture and Control Via GPS Spoofing. Journal of Field Robotics, 31 (4), 617–636. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.21513
  6. Sedjelmaci, H., Senouci, S. M., Ansari, N. (2018). A Hierarchical Detection and Response System to Enhance Security Against Lethal Cyber-Attacks in UAV Networks. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 48 (9), 1594–1606. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2017.2681698
  7. Mitchell, R., Ing-Ray Chen. (2014). Adaptive Intrusion Detection of Malicious Unmanned Air Vehicles Using Behavior Rule Specifications. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44 (5), 593–604. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmc.2013.2265083
  8. Muniraj, D., Farhood, M. (2017). A framework for detection of sensor attacks on small unmanned aircraft systems. 2017 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), 9333, 1189–1198. https://doi.org/10.1109/icuas.2017.7991465
  9. Zhou, Z., Liu, Y. (2021). A Smart Landing Platform With Data-Driven Analytic Procedures for UAV Preflight Safety Diagnosis. IEEE Access, 9, 154876–154891. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3128866
  10. Li, M., Li, G., Zhong, M. (2016). A data driven fault detection and isolation scheme for UAV flight control system. 2016 35th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). https://doi.org/10.1109/chicc.2016.7554425
  11. Gebrie, M. T. (2022). Digital Twin for UAV Anomaly Detection. The University of Oslo, 74. Available at: https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/93934/1/DTAnomally.pdf
  12. Liang, S., Zhang, S., Huang, Y., Zheng, X., Cheng, J., Wu, S. (2022). Data-driven fault diagnosis of FW-UAVs with consideration of multiple operation conditions. ISA Transactions, 126, 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2021.07.043
  13. Yousefi, P., Fekriazgomi, H., Demir, M. A., Prevost, J. J., Jamshidi, M. (2018). Data-Driven Fault Detection of Un-Manned Aerial Vehicles Using Supervised Learning Over Cloud Networks. 2018 World Automation Congress (WAC). https://doi.org/10.23919/wac.2018.8430428
  14. Yang, T., Chen, J., Deng, H., Lu, Y. (2023). UAV Abnormal State Detection Model Based on Timestamp Slice and Multi-Separable CNN. Electronics, 12 (6), 1299. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12061299
  15. Perehuda, O., Rodionov, A., Bobunov, A. (2022). Faceted classification of occasions in flight for class 1 unmanned aerial vehicle. Science and Technology of the Air Force of Ukraine, 1 (46), 85–91. https://doi.org/10.30748/nitps.2022.46.12
  16. Mohd Selamat, S. A., Prakoonwit, S., Sahandi, R., Khan, W., Ramachandran, M. (2018). Big data analytics – A review of data‐mining models for small and medium enterprises in the transportation sector. WIREs Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 8 (3). https://doi.org/10.1002/widm.1238
  17. Chapman, P., Clinton, J., Kerber, R., Khabaza, T., Reinartz, T., Shearer, C. et al. (2000). CRISP-DM 1.0: Step-by-Step Data Mining Guide. CRISP-DM consortium. SPSS, 78. Available at: https://www.kde.cs.uni-kassel.de/wp-content/uploads/lehre/ws2012-13/kdd/files/CRISPWP-0800.pdf
  18. Plotnikova, V., Dumas, M., Milani, F. (2021). Adapting the CRISP-DM Data Mining Process: A Case Study in the Financial Services Domain. Research Challenges in Information Science, 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75018-3_4
  19. Niakšu, O. (2015). CRISP Data Mining Methodology Extension for Medical Domain. Baltic J. Modern Computing. 3 (2), 92–109. Available at: https://www.bjmc.lu.lv/fileadmin/user_upload/lu_portal/projekti/bjmc/Contents/3_2_2_Niaksu.pdf
  20. Solarte, J. (2002). A proposed data mining methodology and its application to industrial engineering. University of Tennessee, 104. Available at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3549&context=utk_gradthes
  21. Plotnikova, V., Dumas, M., Milani, F. (2020). Adaptations of data mining methodologies: a systematic literature review. PeerJ Computer Science, 6, e267. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.267
  22. Kononova, K. (2020). Mashynne navchannia: metody ta modeli. Kharkiv: KhNU imeni V. N. Karazina, 301. Available at: https://moodle.znu.edu.ua/pluginfile.php/593075/mod_folder/intro/Базовий%20підручник_2%20%28Кононова%20К.%20Ю.%20Машинне%20навчання%20-%20методи%20та%20моделі%29.pdf
  23. Lykhach, O., Ugryumov, M., Shevchenko, D., Shmatkov, S. (2022). Anomaly detection methods in sample datasets when managing processes in systems by the state. Bulletin of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University, Series «Mathematical Modeling. Information Technology. Automated Control Systems», 53, 21–40. https://doi.org/10.26565/2304-6201-2022-53-03
  24. Subbotin, S. A. (2010). Kompleks harakteristik i kriteriev sravneniya obuchayuschih vyborok dlya resheniya zadach diagnostiki i raspoznavaniya obrazov. Matematicheskie mashiny i sistemy, 1 (1), 25–39. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/247158465_Kompleks_harakteristik_i_kriteriev_sravnenia_obucausih_vyborok_dla_resenia_zadac_diagnostiki_i_raspoznavania_obrazov
  25. Kavrin, D. А., Subbotin, S. A. (2018). The methods for quantitative solving the class imbalance problem. Radio Electronics, Computer Science, Control, 1 (44), 83–90. Available at: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/riu_2018_1_12
  26. Biloborodova, T., Koverha, M., Petrov, P., Lomakin, S., Krytska, Ya. (2021). Doslidzhennia metodiv vyrishennia problemy nezbalansovanykh danykh. Naukovi visti Dalivskoho universytetu, 21. https://doi.org/10.33216/2222-3428-2021-21-1
  27. Kovbasyuk, S., Osadchuk, R., Romanchuk, M., Naumchak, L. (2023). An approach to forming a prior dataset of neural network for processing digital aerial photos. Problems of construction, testing, application and operation of complex information systems, 23, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.46972/2076-1546.2022.23.06
  28. Bondyra, A., Ga̧sior, P., Gardecki, S., Kasiński, A. (2018). Development of the Sensory Network for the Vibration-based Fault Detection and Isolation in the Multirotor UAV Propulsion System. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Informatics in Control, Automation and Robotics. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006846801020109
  29. Sadhu, V., Anjum, K., Pompili, D. (2023). On-Board Deep-Learning-Based Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Fault Cause Detection and Classification via FPGAs. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 39 (4), 3319–3331. https://doi.org/10.1109/tro.2023.3269380
  30. Abramov, N., Talalayev, A., Fralenko, V., Khachumov, V., Shishkin, O. (2017). The high–performance neural network system for monitoring of state and behavior of spacecraft subsystems by telemetry data. Program Systems: Theory and Applications, 8 (3), 109–131. https://doi.org/10.25209/2079-3316-2017-8-3-109-131
Devising a method for integrated dataset formation and selecting a model for recognizing the technical condition of unmanned aerial vehicle

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Perehuda, O., Rodionov, A., Fedorchuk, D., Zhuravskyi, S., Konvisar, M., Volynets, T., Datsyk, V., Zakalad, M., Tsybulia, S., & Trysnyuk, T. (2024). Devising a method for integrated dataset formation and selecting a model for recognizing the technical condition of unmanned aerial vehicle. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(4 (131), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.312217

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects