Assessing the effectiveness of implementing immersive technologies within university sustainable development systems

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314232

Keywords:

assessment method, immersive technologies, sustainable development, university development system

Abstract

The subject of this study is the processes of assessing the effectiveness of the implementation of immersive technologies in the systems of sustainable development at universities. The problem that determined the purpose of the work is the lack of methodological tools for assessing the level of efficiency in the implementation of immersive technologies on the basis of sustainable development (using an example of Lviv Polytechnic National University). The authors’ toolkit includes a system of indicators, a methodological approach to the use of software for their evaluation, and a matrix for interpreting the results. The choice of the efficiency assessment method is based on the theory of fuzzy sets. The study of the factors influencing the effectiveness of the implementation of immersive technologies in the educational process has made it possible to form a system of integrated indicators, including indicators designed to comprehensively identify its level in the student and teaching environments. The indicator of effectiveness of immersive technologies implemented by students contributes to a thorough analysis of their ability to generate innovations based on such technologies. This indicator allows lecturers to determine the level of effectiveness of the use of immersive technologies in teaching. Taking into account the ideology embedded in the sustainable development systems of universities, the authors' indicators reflect the principles of sustainability. The GE/McKinsey matrix was adapted for the purpose of economic interpretation of mathematical results. The designed methodological tools were tested for courses at the Lviv Polytechnic. The following levels of student performance were obtained: 83.5, 61.5, and 69.8 units, lecturers – 91.2, 78.4, and 82.7 units, which indicates the productivity of lecturer training and a high level of students' understanding of project work tasks. This proved the validity and possibility of using the tools in university practice

Author Biographies

Viktoriia Prokhorova, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Economics and Management

Oleksandra Mrykhina, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Orest Koleshchuk, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Tetiana Demianenko, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Economics and Management

References

  1. Impact Rankings 2022: hundreds of universities have SDG courses. Available at: https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/impact-rankings-2022-hundreds-universities-have-sdg-courses
  2. Adams, T., Jameel, S. M., Goggins, J. (2023). Education for Sustainable Development: Mapping the SDGs to University Curricula. Sustainability, 15 (10), 8340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108340
  3. Earth911. Available at: https://earth911.com/inspire/green-universities-offering-sustainability-degree-programs/
  4. Brundiers, K., Barth, M., Cebrián, G., Cohen, M., Diaz, L., Doucette-Remington, S. et al. (2020). Key competencies in sustainability in higher education – toward an agreed-upon reference framework. Sustainability Science, 16 (1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00838-2
  5. Office of Sustainability. Georgia Institute of Technology. Available at: https://sustain.gatech.edu/
  6. Baxter, G., Hainey, T. (2023). Using immersive technologies to enhance the student learning experience. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 21 (3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/itse-05-2023-0078
  7. Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers & Education, 147, 103778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778
  8. Moolman, J., Corkery, G., Walsh, J., Morrissey-Tucker, S. (2022). The use of collaborative virtual environments (CVES) for engineering education in higher education institutions. EDULEARN22 Proceedings, 1, 5073–5081. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2022.1212
  9. Pellas, N., Dengel, A., Christopoulos, A. (2020). A Scoping Review of Immersive Virtual Reality in STEM Education. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 13 (4), 748–761. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2020.3019405
  10. Bonasio, A. (2019). Immersive experiences in education: New places and spaces for learning. White paper, Microsoft.
  11. Palkova, Z., Fragkaki, M., Abdelhafid, F., Al-Qubaj, S. R., Aburajab, N., Hawamdeh, M. et al. (2019). Virtual reality as an innovative and immersive learning tool for heis in palestine. INTED2019 Proceedings, 1, 4517–4522. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2019.1121
  12. Scurati, G. W., Bertoni, M., Graziosi, S., Ferrise, F. (2021). Exploring the Use of Virtual Reality to Support Environmentally Sustainable Behavior: A Framework to Design Experiences. Sustainability, 13 (2), 943. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020943
  13. Salloum, S., Al Marzouqi, A., Alderbashi, K. Y., Shwedeh, F., Aburayya, A., Al Saidat, M. R., Al-Maroof, R. S. (2023). Sustainability Model for the Continuous Intention to Use Metaverse Technology in Higher Education: A Case Study from Oman. Sustainability, 15 (6), 5257. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065257
  14. Karyy, O., Novakivskyi, I., Kis, Y., Kulyniak, I., Adamovsky, A. (2023). Model of Educational Process Organizing Using Artificial Intelligence Technologies. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Systems. Volume III: Intelligent Systems Workshop, 332–347. Available at: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3403/paper27.pdf
  15. Prokhorova, V., Yemelyanov, O., Koleshchuk, O., Mnykh, O., Us, Y. (2024). Development of tools for assessing the impact of logistics communications on investment activities of enterprises in the context of capital movement. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (13 (129)), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.304257
  16. Ryan, G. V., Callaghan, S., Rafferty, A., Higgins, M. F., Mangina, E., McAuliffe, F. (2022). Learning Outcomes of Immersive Technologies in Health Care Student Education: Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24 (2), e30082. https://doi.org/10.2196/30082
  17. Davila Delgado, J. M., Oyedele, L., Demian, P., Beach, T. (2020). A research agenda for augmented and virtual reality in architecture, engineering and construction. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 45, 101122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2020.101122
  18. Cataldo, R., Grassia, M. G., Lauro, C. N., Marino, M., Voytsekhovska, V. (2020). A Bibliometric Study of the Global Research Activity in Sustainability and Its Dimensions. Data Science and Social Research II, 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51222-4_8
  19. Petrushka, I., Yemelyanov, O., Zagozetska, O., Musiiovska, O., Petrushka, K. (2023). Assessment of the Impact of Biofuel Production on the Sustainable Development of Enterprises in the Agrarian Sector of Ukraine. Developments in Information and Knowledge Management Systems for Business Applications, 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25695-0_6
  20. Lourenço, F., Almeida, M., Oliveira, N. R., Pedro, N. (2024). Enhancing learning outcomes: combining case studies with immersive technology. EDULEARN24 Proceedings, 1, 7703–7708. https://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2024.1812
  21. Pylypenko, H. M., Prokhorova, V. V., Mrykhina, O. B., Koleshchuk, O. Y., Mushnykova, S. A. (2020). Cost evaluation models of R&D products of industrial enterprises. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 5, 163–170. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2020-5/163
  22. Prokhorova, V., Mrykhina, O., Koleshchuk, O., Slastianykova, K., Harmatiy, M. (2023). The holistic evaluation system of R&D results under the circular economy conditions. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (13 (126)), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.291380
  23. Mrykhina, O., Lisovska, L. (2020). Methodical Approach to Pricing of R&D Products During their Transfer from Universities to Business Environment. 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 7, 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1109/csit49958.2020.9321884
  24. Lourenço, J., Morais, J., Monteiro, J., Santos, J., Neves, N., Sá, S. (2022). Conceptions on higher education students about use of technologies in the learning process: a comparative study. INTED2022 Proceedings, 1, 3721–3730. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2022.1038
  25. The "Lviv Polytechnic - 2025" Development Strategy. Available at: https://lpnu.ua/sites/default/files/2020/pages/2316/strategy-2025-110122.pdf
  26. ERASMUS+. Available at: https://lpnu.ua/cmo/erasmus
  27. " Ekonomika staloho rozvytku v konteksti didzhytalizatsiyi": rozpochato seriyu lektsiy u ramkakh proiektu SUSTAIN. Available at: https://lpnu.ua/news/ekonomika-staloho-rozvytku-v-konteksti-didzhytalizatsii-rozpochato-seriiu-lektsii-u-ramkakh
  28. Kataloh vybirkovykh dystsyplin. Available at: https://directory.lpnu.ua/selective_subjects
  29. McKinsey & Company. Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/
Assessing the effectiveness of implementing immersive technologies within university sustainable development systems

Downloads

Published

2024-10-31

How to Cite

Prokhorova, V., Mrykhina, O., Koleshchuk, O., & Demianenko, T. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of implementing immersive technologies within university sustainable development systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5(13 (131), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.314232

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology