Creation of the generative model of a scale-free network with homophilic structure

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326092

Keywords:

scale-free property, homophily, modularity, generative network models, node communities

Abstract

The object of this study is the models of complex networks. The task addressed is to construct a generative model of a growing network, which has two key features characteristic of real-world networks: scale-free property and homophily. Homophily of a network is understood as the tendency of nodes to group into communities. To combine the requirements for homophily and scale-free property, a two-level rule of preferential attachment has been devised. First, the color of a new node is chosen with a probability proportional to the volume of the corresponding community, and then, according to the usual rule of preferential attachment, neighboring nodes are chosen within the community. It has been shown that the computational complexity of generating a network model with n nodes is O(n). It has been proven that under such conditions, the distribution of degrees of nodes across the entire network is the same as in the classical non-homophilic Barabási-Albert network and does not depend on the number and structure of communities. Under the conditions of homophily, it is quite natural to generalize the requirement for scale-free property to the distribution of community sizes. It has been found that this distribution is determined by the intensity of the formation of new communities. The dependence of the expected time interval between the formations of successive communities on their index has been established. The measure of homophily of the generated networks – modularity – has been estimated; its dependence on the scaling of the community volumes was found. The model built allows step-by-step generation of growing scale-free networks that have a built-in mechanism for the formation of communities, which is of practical significance. Moreover, the proposed model could also be used in the opposite direction: given the structural parameters of the network, it is possible to restore the hidden rules by which this network evolves

Author Biographies

Vadim Shergin, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Sergei Grinyov, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Larysa Chala, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Artificial Intelligence

Serhii Udovenko, Semyon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics

Doctor of Technical Scienses, Professor

Department of Informatics and Computer Engineering

References

  1. Li, A., Li, J., Pan, Y. (2013). Homophyly Networks – A Structural Theory of Networks. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.8295
  2. Dorogovtsev, S. N., Mendes, J. F. F., Samukhin, A. N. (2000). Structure of Growing Networks with Preferential Linking. Physical Review Letters, 85 (21), 4633–4636. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.85.4633
  3. Newman, M. E. J. (2003). Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E, 67 (2). https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.67.026126
  4. Mele, A. (2017). A Structural Model of Homophily and Clustering in Social Networks. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3031489
  5. Choromański, K., Matuszak, M., Miȩkisz, J. (2013). Scale-Free Graph with Preferential Attachment and Evolving Internal Vertex Structure. Journal of Statistical Physics, 151 (6), 1175–1183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-013-0749-1
  6. Newman, M. (2005). Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf’s law. Contemporary Physics, 46 (5), 323–351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444
  7. Albert, R., Barabási, A.-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Reviews of Modern Physics, 74 (1), 47–97. https://doi.org/10.1103/revmodphys.74.47
  8. Noldus, R., Van Mieghem, P. (2015). Assortativity in complex networks. Journal of Complex Networks, 3 (4), 507–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/comnet/cnv005
  9. Shergin, V., Udovenko, S., Chala, L. (2020). Assortativity Properties of Barabási-Albert Networks. Data-Centric Business and Applications, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43070-2_4
  10. Li, A., Li, J., Pan, Y. (2013). Community Structures Are Definable in Networks, and Universal in Real World. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1310.8294
  11. Girvan, M., Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Community structure in social and biological networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (12), 7821–7826. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.122653799
  12. Shergin, V., Grinyov, S., Chala, L., Udovenko, S. (2024). Network community detection using modified modularity criterion. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (4 (132)), 6–13. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.318452
  13. Shergin, V., Chala, L., Udovenko, S., Pogurskaya, M. (2020). Elastic Scale-Free Networks Model Based on the Mediaton-Driven Attachment Rule. 2020 IEEE Third International Conference on Data Stream Mining & Processing (DSMP), 291–295. https://doi.org/10.1109/dsmp47368.2020.9204207
  14. Raskin, L., Sira, O. (2021). Devising methods for planning a multifactorial multilevel experiment with high dimensionality. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (4 (113)), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2021.242304
Creation of the generative model of a scale-free network with homophilic structure

Downloads

Published

2025-04-30

How to Cite

Shergin, V., Grinyov, S., Chala, L., & Udovenko, S. (2025). Creation of the generative model of a scale-free network with homophilic structure. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(4 (134), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326092

Issue

Section

Mathematics and Cybernetics - applied aspects