Devising a method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of three software-defined-radio receivers used in pairs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326781

Keywords:

unmanned aerial vehicle, paired use of SDR receivers, bearing intersection angle

Abstract

The object of this study is the process of determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle. The main hypothesis of the study assumed that the use of a network of three Software-Defined Radio (SDR) receivers could improve the accuracy of determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle. The use of SDR receivers in pairs would reduce the number of false bearings.

A method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of three SDR receivers when used in pairs has been improved, which, unlike the known ones, involves:

– measuring bearings by each SDR receiver;

– determining the pairwise angles of intersection of bearings;

– determining the maximum of the pairwise angles of intersection;

– determining a pair of SDR receivers for further calculations;

– using the triangulation method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle.

The accuracy of determining the coordinates of an aerial object by a network of two SDR receivers has been assessed. It was found that:

– the shape, orientation, and size of the error ellipses depend on the relative location in space of the SDR receivers and the unmanned aerial vehicle;

– the size of the scattering ellipses is reduced by (20–40) % due to the use of information from the optimal pair;

– in some cases, false switching of SDR receiver pairs is noticeable;

– the pair (first SDR receiver – third SDR receiver) has the largest base from the considered options, that is, starting from a certain range, the angle of intersection of the bearings for this case is closest to 90°, the area of the scattering ellipses of coordinate measurement errors is minimal, which determines its choice;

– when moving the unmanned aerial vehicle beyond the network coverage area of the SDR receiver pair, it is advisable to use another pair, this involves the use of a “chain” of SDR receivers

Author Biographies

Hennadii Khudov, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Professor, Head of Department

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Andrii Hryzo, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

PhD, Associate Professor, Head of Research Laboratory

Research Laboratory

Department of Radar Troops Tactic

Volodymyr Komarov, Research Institute of Military Intelligence

Doctor of Military Sciences, Professor, Head of Research Department

Kostiantyn Yatsenko, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Theory and Design of Automotive and Special Vehicles

Oleksandr Makoveichuk, Higher Education Institution "Academician Yuriy Bugay International Scientific and Technical University"

Doctor of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor

Department of Computer Sciences and Software Engineering

Rostyslav Khudov, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University

Department of Theoretical and Applied Computer Science

Petro Mynko, Kharkiv National University of Radio Electronics

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Higher Mathematics

Olena Goncharenko, State Scientific Research Institute of Armament and Military Equipment Testing and Certification

PhD, Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Oleh Salnyk, Ivan Kozhedub Kharkiv National Air Force University

Senior Researcher

Scientific Research Department of the Air Force

Valerii Vlasiuk, Kyiv Institute of the National Guard of Ukraine

PhD, Associate Professor, Deputy Head of Department

Department of Tactics and Tactical-Special Training

References

  1. Goldstein, L., Waechter, N. (2023). Chinese Strategists Evaluate the Use of 'Kamikaze' Drones in the Russia-Ukraine War. Available at: https://www.rand.org/pubs/commentary/2023/11/chinese-strategists-evaluate-the-use-of-kamikaze-drones.html
  2. Grigore, L., Cristescu, C. (2024). The Use of Drones in Tactical Military Operations in the Integrated and Cybernetic Battlefield. Land Forces Academy Review, 29 (2), 269–273. https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2024-0029
  3. Riabukha, V. P. (2020). Radar Surveillance of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (Review). Radioelectronics and Communications Systems, 63 (11), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.3103/s0735272720110011
  4. Hrudka, O. (2024). Russian drone manufacturer ‘Orlan-10’ ramps up production despite sanctions, Inform Napalm reports. Available at: https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/01/13/russian-drone-manufacturer-orlan-10-ramps-up-production-despite-sanctions-inform-napalm-reports/
  5. British intelligence: Russian radar destroyed in missile attack on Belbek in Crimea (2024). Available at: https://mind.ua/en/news/20269399-british-intelligence-russian-radar-destroyed-in-missile-attack-on-belbek-in-crimea
  6. Khudov, H., Makoveichuk, O., Kostyria, O., Butko, I., Poliakov, A., Kozhushko, Y. et al. (2024). Devising a method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vechicle via a network of portable spectrum analyzers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (9 (132)), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2024.318551
  7. Khudov, H., Kostianets, O., Kovalenko, O., Maslenko, O., Solomonenko, Y. (2023). Using Software-Defined radio receivers for determining the coordinates of low-visible aerial objects. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4 (9 (124)), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2023.286466
  8. Boussel, P. (2024). The Golden Age of Drones: Military UAV Strategic Issues and Tactical Developments. Available at: https://trendsresearch.org/insight/the-golden-age-of-drones-military-uav-strategic-issues-and-tactical-developments/?srsltid=AfmBOoptC41niCzbAJGHOTcUhRGJpWEW_y7hHLkJ_5hkabW_fIBS5sZ
  9. Melvin, W. L., Scheer, J. (2012). Principles of Modern Radar: Advanced techniques. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/sbra020e
  10. Melvin, W. L., Scheer, J. A. (2013). Principles of Modern Radar: Volume 3: Radar Applications. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/sbra503e
  11. Lishchenko, V., Kalimulin, T., Khizhnyak, I., Khudov, H. (2018). The Method of the organization Coordinated Work for Air Surveillance in MIMO Radar. 2018 International Conference on Information and Telecommunication Technologies and Radio Electronics (UkrMiCo), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ukrmico43733.2018.9047560
  12. Neyt, X., Raout, J., Kubica, M., Kubica, V., Roques, S., Acheroy, M., Verly, J. G. (2006). Feasibility of STAP for Passive GSM-Based Radar. 2006 IEEE Conference on Radar, 546–551. https://doi.org/10.1109/radar.2006.1631853
  13. Willis, N. J. (2004). Bistatic Radar. The Institution of Engineering and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1049/sbra003e
  14. Semenov, S., Jian, Y., Jiang, H., Chernykh, O., Binkovska, A. (2025). Mathematical model of intelligent UAV flight path planning. Advanced Information Systems, 9 (1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2025.1.06
  15. Ruban, I., Khudov, H., Lishchenko, V., Pukhovyi, O., Popov, S., Kolos, R. et al. (2020). Assessing the detection zones of radar stations with the additional use of radiation from external sources. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (9 (108)), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2020.216118
  16. Multilateration (MLAT) Concept of Use (2007). ICAO Asia and Pacific Office. Available at: https://www.icao.int/APAC/Documents/edocs/mlat_concept.pdf
  17. Luo, D., Wen, G. (2024). Distributed Phased Multiple-Input Multiple-Output Radars for Early Warning: Observation Area Generation. Remote Sensing, 16 (16), 3052. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16163052
  18. Kalkan, Y. (2024). 20 Years of MIMO Radar. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 39 (3), 28–35. https://doi.org/10.1109/maes.2023.3349228
  19. Barabash, O., Kyrianov, A. (2023). Development of control laws of unmanned aerial vehicles for performing group flight at the straight-line horizontal flight stage. Advanced Information Systems, 7 (4), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.20998/2522-9052.2023.4.02
  20. Weber, C., Peter, M., Felhauer, T. (2015). Automatic modulation classification technique for radio monitoring. Electronics Letters, 51 (10), 794–796. https://doi.org/10.1049/el.2015.0610
  21. Khudov, H., Hryzo, A., Oleksenko, O., Repilo, I., Lisohorskyi, B., Poliakov, A. et al. (2025). Devising a method for determining the coordinates of an air object by a network of two SDR receivers. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (9 (133)), 62–68. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.323336
Devising a method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of three software-defined-radio receivers used in pairs

Downloads

Published

2025-04-29

How to Cite

Khudov, H., Hryzo, A., Komarov, V., Yatsenko, K., Makoveichuk, O., Khudov, R., Mynko, P., Goncharenko, O., Salnyk, O., & Vlasiuk, V. (2025). Devising a method for determining the coordinates of an unmanned aerial vehicle by a network of three software-defined-radio receivers used in pairs. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 2(9 (134), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.326781

Issue

Section

Information and controlling system