Assessing the potential to overcome economic barriers in the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337648

Keywords:

enterprise potential, enterprise potential assessment toolkit, energy-saving technologies, economic obstacles, overcoming obstacles, energy-saving project

Abstract

This study’s object is the potential to overcome economic barriers in the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies at enterprises. The task addressed is to devise an effective toolset for assessing this potential.

The theoretical foundations for analyzing economic barriers in the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies have been substantiated. A procedure for assessing the potential for overcoming these obstacles was developed. This procedure involves determining the capabilities of enterprises under certain conditions to overcome specified barriers of a subjective and objective nature. In turn, such conditions include enhancing the competence of company personnel and improving the processes of information support for the process that assesses the effectiveness of energy-saving projects, as well as positive changes of an external nature.

The designed toolkit was assessed using data from 98 industrial enterprises in the western region of Ukraine. Among other things, it was found that the companies studied have a sufficiently high potential for overcoming economic obstacles that arise when implementing energy-saving technological processes. In particular, the share of energy-saving technology projects that were considered and rejected because of the presence of subjective economic obstacles in the total number of rejected projects varies by industry from 39.29% to 47.54%.

The proposed toolkit produces accurate and comprehensive results using a formalized procedure. It could be used by enterprises in various industries to assess the potential for overcoming economic barriers to the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies

Author Biographies

Valentyn Lesinskyi, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Radioengineering and Information Security

Olexandr Yemelyanov, Lviv Polytechnic National University

Doctor of Economic Sciences, Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Oksana Zarytska, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Tetyana Petrushka, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

Nataliia Myroshchenko, Lviv Polytechnic National University

PhD, Associate Professor

Department of Business Economics and Investment

References

  1. Kirikkaleli, D., Güngör, H., Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Consumption‐based carbon emissions, renewable energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in Chile. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31 (3), 1123–1137. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2945
  2. Dolge, K., Āzis, R., Lund, P. D., Blumberga, D. (2021). Importance of Energy Efficiency in Manufacturing Industries for Climate and Competitiveness. Environmental and Climate Technologies, 25 (1), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.2478/rtuect-2021-0022
  3. Chevallier, J. (2011). Detecting instability in the volatility of carbon prices. Energy Economics, 33 (1), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2010.09.006
  4. Yemelyanov, O., Petrushka, T., Lesyk, L., Havryliak, A., Yanevych, N., Kurylo, O. et al. (2023). Assessing the Sustainability of the Consumption of Agricultural Products with Regard to a Possible Reduction in Its Imports: The Case of Countries That Import Corn and Wheat. Sustainability, 15 (12), 9761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129761
  5. Liutak, O., Baula, O., Poruchnyk, A., Stoliarchuk, Ya., Kravchuk, P., Kostynets, Iu. (2021). The Development Of Renewable Energy In The Context Of Formation Of Innovative Economy And Energy Independence As The Geopolitical Priorities Of The State. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 628 (1), 012012. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/628/1/012012
  6. Sutthichaimethee, P., Sa-Ngiamvibool, W., Wattana, B., Luo, J., Wattana, S. (2025). Enhancing Sustainable Strategic Governance for Energy-Consumption Reduction Towards Carbon Neutrality in the Energy and Transportation Sectors. Sustainability, 17 (6), 2659. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062659
  7. Ayres, R., Turton, H., Casten, T. (2007). Energy efficiency, sustainability and economic growth. Energy, 32 (5), 634–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2006.06.005
  8. Bhowmik, C., Bhowmik, S., Ray, A., Pandey, K. M. (2017). Optimal green energy planning for sustainable development: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 71, 796–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.105
  9. Petrushka, I., Yemelyanov, O., Petrushka, T., Koleshchuk, O., Reznik, N. (2020). Influence of energy-saving technology changes on the agro-industrial enterprises innovativeness in terms of digitalization. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29, 2489–2496.
  10. Lesinskyi, V., Yemelyanov, O., Zarytska, O., Petrushka, T., Myroshchenko, N. (2022). Designing a toolset for assessing the organizational and technological inertia of energy consumption processes at enterprises. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 6 (13 (120)), 29–40. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2022.267231
  11. Backman, F. (2017). Barriers to Energy Efficiency in Swedish Non-Energy-Intensive Micro- and Small-Sized Enterprises – A Case Study of a Local Energy Program. Energies, 10 (1), 100. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10010100
  12. Kostka, G., Moslener, U., Andreas, J. (2013). Barriers to increasing energy efficiency: evidence from small-and medium-sized enterprises in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 57, 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.025
  13. Yemelyanov, O., Petrushka, I., Zahoretska, O., Petrushka, K., Havryliak, A. (2023). Information support for managing energy-saving technological changes at enterprises. Procedia Computer Science, 217, 258–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.221
  14. Kazemi, M., Kazemi, A. (2022). Financial barriers to residential buildings’ energy efficiency in Iran. Energy Efficiency, 15 (5). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-022-10039-8
  15. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E., Pugliese, G. (2013). Empirical investigation of energy efficiency barriers in Italian manufacturing SMEs. Energy, 49, 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.10.012
  16. Zhang, Z., Jin, X., Yang, Q., Zhang, Y. (2013). An empirical study on the institutional factors of energy conservation and emissions reduction: Evidence from listed companies in China. Energy Policy, 57, 36–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.07.011
  17. Jackson, J. (2010). Promoting energy efficiency investments with risk management decision tools. Energy Policy, 38 (8), 3865–3873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.006
  18. Musiiovska, O., Petrushka, K., Muzychenko-Kozlovska, O., Yemelyanov, O., Zhyhalo, O. (2024). System of Indicators for Assessing the Susceptibility of Enterprises to Energy-Saving Technologies. Systems, Decision and Control in Energy VI, 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67091-6_8
  19. Nesbakken, R. (1999). Price sensitivity of residential energy consumption in Norway. Energy Economics, 21 (6), 493–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-9883(99)00022-5
  20. Trianni, A., Cagno, E., Worrell, E. (2013). Innovation and adoption of energy efficient technologies: An exploratory analysis of Italian primary metal manufacturing SMEs. Energy Policy, 61, 430–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.034
  21. Yepifanova, I., Dzhedzhula, V. (2020). Methodology of evaluation of innovative potential of enterprises. Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, 6 (3), 171–190. https://doi.org/10.51599/are.2020.06.03.10
  22. Loo, M. K., Ramachandran, S., Raja Yusof, R. N. (2023). Unleashing the potential: Enhancing technology adoption and innovation for micro, small and medium-sized enterprises (MSMEs). Cogent Economics & Finance, 11 (2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2023.2267748
  23. Zhu, Q., Li, X., Li, F., Zhou, D. (2020). The potential for energy saving and carbon emission reduction in China’s regional industrial sectors. Science of The Total Environment, 716, 135009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135009
  24. Özkara, Y., Atak, M. (2015). Regional total-factor energy efficiency and electricity saving potential of manufacturing industry in Turkey. Energy, 93, 495–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.09.036
  25. Richnák, P., Fidlerová, H. (2022). Impact and Potential of Sustainable Development Goals in Dimension of the Technological Revolution Industry 4.0 within the Analysis of Industrial Enterprises. Energies, 15 (10), 3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15103697
  26. Kangas, H.-L., Lazarevic, D., Kivimaa, P. (2018). Technical skills, disinterest and non-functional regulation: Barriers to building energy efficiency in Finland viewed by energy service companies. Energy Policy, 114, 63–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.11.060
  27. Palm, J., Backman, F. (2020). Energy efficiency in SMEs: overcoming the communication barrier. Energy Efficiency, 13 (5), 809–821. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-020-09839-7
  28. Yemelyanov, O., Petrushka, T., Lesyk, L., Symak, A., Vovk, O. (2020). Modelling and Information Support for the Development of Government Programs to Increase the Accessibility of Small Business Lending. 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT), 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1109/csit49958.2020.9322040
  29. Hui, J., Cai, W., Wang, C., Ye, M. (2017). Analyzing the penetration barriers of clean generation technologies in China’s power sector using a multi-region optimization model. Applied Energy, 185, 1809–1820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.02.034
  30. Yemelyanov, O. Yu., Petrushka, T. O., Symak, A. V., Lesyk, L. I., Musiiovska, O. B. (2021). Modelling the Impact of Energy-Saving Technological Changes on the Market Capitalization of Companies. Systems, Decision and Control in Energy III, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-87675-3_5
  31. Kim, T. K. (2017). Understanding one-way ANOVA using conceptual figures. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70 (1), 22. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.1.22
Assessing the potential to overcome economic barriers in the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies

Downloads

Published

2025-08-27

How to Cite

Lesinskyi, V., Yemelyanov, O., Zarytska, O., Petrushka, T., & Myroshchenko, N. (2025). Assessing the potential to overcome economic barriers in the design and implementation of energy-saving technologies. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 4(13 (136), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2025.337648

Issue

Section

Transfer of technologies: industry, energy, nanotechnology